Ste*_*ike 15 java groovy testng jenkins
我有一个非常简单的Jenkins Multijob项目:
我想设置Multijob状态如下:
我知道我可以使用带有如下脚本的Groovy post构建操作,但我不知道如何设置所需的阈值级别:
void log(msg) {
manager.listener.logger.println(msg)
}
threshold = Result.SUCCESS
void aggregate_results() {
failed = false
mainJob = manager.build.getProject().getName()
job = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(mainJob)
log '-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
log 'Aggregated status report'
log '-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
log('${mainJob} #${manager.build.getNumber()} - ${manager.build.getResult()}')
job.getLastBuild().getSubBuilds().each { subBuild->
subJob = subBuild.getJobName()
subJobNumber = subBuild.getBuildNumber()
job = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(subBuild.getJobName())
log '${subJob} #${subJobNumber} - ${job.getLastCompletedBuild().getResult()}'
log job.getLastCompletedBuild().getLog()
//println subBuild
dePhaseJob = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(subBuild.getJobName())
dePhaseJobBuild = dePhaseJob.getBuildByNumber(subBuild.getBuildNumber())
dePhaseJobBuild.getSubBuilds().each { childSubBuild ->
try {
log ' ${childSubBuild.jobName}'
job = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(childSubBuild.getJobName())
build = job.getBuildByNumber(childSubBuild.getBuildNumber())
indent = ' '
log '${indent} #${build.getNumber()} - ${build.getResult()}'
log build.getLog()
if(!failed && build.getResult().isWorseThan(threshold) ) {
failed = true
}
} catch (Exception e) {
log('ERROR: ${e.getMessage()}')
failed = true
}
}
}
if(failed) {manager.build.setResult(hudson.model.Result.FAILURE)}
}
try {
aggregate_results()
} catch(Exception e) {
log('ERROR: ${e.message}')
log('ERROR: Failed Status report aggregation')
manager.build.setResult(hudson.model.Result.FAILURE)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
任何人都可以帮助调整脚本来实现我的需求吗?
不确定这是否真的符合答案。可能更多的是注释,但注释并不真正适合长代码片段,所以这里是。
为了使您的代码更具可读性和更容易理解,我做了以下操作:
build.getResult()变成build.resultlog('ERROR: ${e.getMessage()}')变成log 'ERROR: ${e.getMessage()}'log 'ERROR: ${e.message}'变成log "ERROR: ${e.message}"subJob = ...变为def subJob = .... 在全局范围内声明所有内容会导致难以发现的问题,特别是如果您重复使用job.我还清理了一些冗余的内容,例如:
job.getLastBuild().getSubBuilds().each { subBuild->
subJob = subBuild.getJobName()
subJobNumber = subBuild.getBuildNumber()
job = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(subBuild.getJobName()) // <---
...
//println subBuild
dePhaseJob = hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(subBuild.getJobName()) // <---
dePhaseJobBuild = dePhaseJob.getBuildByNumber(subBuild.getBuildNumber())
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以这里我们将job和都设置dePhaseJob为相同的值。像这样将相同的值分配给两个单独的变量是多余的,只会使代码更难以阅读。
此外(我对 jenkins 内部 api 不太熟悉,所以我在这里可能是错的)上面代码中的以下流程似乎关闭了:
subBuild实例job和dePhaseJobdePhaseJobBuild使用dePHaseJob.getBuildByNumber(subBuild.buildNumer)但这不就留给我们了吗subBuild == dePhaseJobBuild?也就是说,我们花费了所有这些代码只是为了检索我们已经拥有的值。我们从构建到工作,再回到构建。除非我在詹金斯 API 中遗漏了一些深奥的东西,否则这似乎也是多余的。
通过所有这些更改和其他一些小更改,我们得到了以下代码:
def job(name) {
hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(name)
}
def aggregateResults() {
def mainJobName = manager.build.project.name
log '-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
log 'Aggregated status report'
log '-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
log "${mainJobName} #${manager.build.number} - ${manager.build.result}"
def failed = false
job(mainJobName).lastBuild.subBuilds.each { subBuild ->
log "${subBuild.jobName} #${subBuild.buildNumber} - ${subBuild.result}"
log subBuild.log
subBuild.subBuilds.each { subSubBuild ->
try {
log " ${subSubBuild.jobName} #${subSubBuild.buildNumber} - ${subSubBuild.result}"
log " " + subSubBuild.getLog(Integer.MAX_VALUE).join("\n ") //indent the log lines
if(!failed && subSubBuild.result.isWorseThan(threshold)) {
failed = true
}
} catch (Exception e) {
log "ERROR: ${e.message}"
failed = true
}
}
}
if(failed) {
manager.build.result = hudson.model.Result.FAILURE
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
再说一遍,我没有詹金斯实例来测试这个,所以我在黑暗中飞行,并提前为拼写错误、语法错误或其他滥用代码和詹金斯 API 的行为道歉。
您的代码中的问题(例如我看不到曾经起作用的字符串插值问题)让我认为原始代码不起作用,而是一种示例模式。
这让我进一步想知道你是否真的需要在这里进行两层嵌套,即如下:
job(mainJobName).lastBuild.subBuilds.each { subBuild ->
subBuild.subBuilds.each { subSubBuild ->
...
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
真的有必要还是一级就足够了?从您问题中的快速图表来看,我们似乎只需要关心主要工作及其子工作,而不是子子工作。
如果是这种情况,您可以遵循以下逻辑:
def aggregateResults() {
def mainJob = job(manager.build.project.name)
def subs = mainJob.lastBuild.subBuilds
def total = subs.size()
def failed = subs.findAll { sub -> sub.result.isWorseThan(threshold) }.size()
if(failed > 0) {
manager.build.result = hudson.model.Result.FAILURE
}
failed == 0 ? "green" : (failed/total < 0.25 ? "yellow" : "red")
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)