xnv*_*v23 2 haskell functional-programming
我试图在列表中获得具有最大总和的列表,然后返回该列表.但是当我用这个函数调用时
max_list [[1,2],[3,6],[10,34,5]]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
它给了我错误:
Exception: a4.hs:65:1-64: Non-exhaustive patterns in function max_list
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是代码:
max_num :: [Int] -> Int
max_num [x] = x
max_num (x:xs) | (max_num xs) > x = maxVal xs
| otherwise = x
max_list :: [[Int]] -> [Int]
max_list [[a]] = head(filter (\x -> (sum_int x) == (max_num [[a]]) [[a]])
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我的逻辑如下:我愿意
示例电话:
head (filter (\x -> (sum x) == 11) [[1,3],[4,7],[2,5]])
> [4,7]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以在那种情况下,我计算了手中的值11,并且每个元素的总和是[4,11,7],它将给出其总和等于最大值的值
使用签名Data.List调用函数maximumBy
maximumBy :: (a -> a -> Ordering) -> [a] -> a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
并Data.Function有on签名
on :: (b -> b -> c) -> (a -> b) -> a -> a -> c
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
应用compare函数(compare :: Ord a => a -> a -> Ordering),我们可以看到这正是您正在寻找的.
import Data.List (maximumBy)
import Data.Function (on)
{- for clarity:
compare :: Ord a => b -> b -> Ordering
(compare `on`) :: Ord b => (a -> b) -> a -> a -> Ordering
compare `on` sum :: (Num a, Ord a) => [a] -> [a] -> Ordering
-- well actually [a] is t a for a foldable t, but same diff -}
result = maximumBy (compare `on` sum) [[1,2],[3,6],[10,34,5]]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为了自己实现这个,你可以写一个折叠,根据它的总和来比较每个值,递归直到总和x大于之后的任何值.
myMaximumBySum [] = [] -- degenerate case
myMaximumBySum [x] = x -- tautological case
myMaximumBySum (x:xs)
| sum x > sum (myMaximumBySum xs) = x
| otherwise = myMaximumBySum xs
-- or more naturally:
myMaximumBySum = foldr f []
where f x acc = if sum x > sum acc then x else acc
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)