.Net Core 2中的模拟Hangfire RecurringJob依赖

umu*_*sen 3 c# dependency-injection hangfire asp.net-core-2.0

考虑以下控制器:

public class SubmissionController : Controller
{ 
    public SubmissionController()
    { }

    public IActionResult Post()
    {
        RecurringJob.AddOrUpdate(() => InitiateSubmission(), Cron.Minutely);

        return Ok("Periodic submission triggered");
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Hangfire是否提供抽象为RecurringJob类注入依赖项?我已经做过一些研究,唯一可用的抽象是IBackgroundJobClient,它没有安排定期工作的选项。

我需要验证该作业已在单元测试中添加。

Cod*_*ler 7

如果您检查源代码RecurringJob类,你会发现它的静态方法导致调用RecurringJobManager类:

public static class RecurringJob
{
    private static readonly Lazy<RecurringJobManager> Instance = new Lazy<RecurringJobManager>(
        () => new RecurringJobManager());

    //  ...

    public static void AddOrUpdate(
        Expression<Action> methodCall,
        string cronExpression,
        TimeZoneInfo timeZone = null,
        string queue = EnqueuedState.DefaultQueue)
    {
        var job = Job.FromExpression(methodCall);
        var id = GetRecurringJobId(job);

        Instance.Value.AddOrUpdate(id, job, cronExpression, timeZone ?? TimeZoneInfo.Utc, queue);
    }

    //  ...
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

RecurringJobManager实现IRecurringJobManager可用于UT中的依赖项注入和模拟的接口。

但是RecurringJob,从lambda获取工作并建立工作ID具有内部逻辑:

var job = Job.FromExpression(methodCall);
var id = GetRecurringJobId(job);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Job.FromExpression()是可以安全使用的公共方法。但是GetRecurringJobId,私有方法定义如下:

private static string GetRecurringJobId(Job job)
{
    return $"{job.Type.ToGenericTypeString()}.{job.Method.Name}";
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

GetRecurringJobId基本上以的形式返回作业方法的名称SubmissionController.InitiateSubmission。它基于内部类,TypeExtensions带有的扩展方法Type。您不能直接使用此类,因为它是内部的,因此您应该复制该逻辑。

如果您采用这种方法,最终的解决方案将是:

TypeExtensions(从Hangfire来源复制):

static class TypeExtensions
{
    public static string ToGenericTypeString(this Type type)
    {
        if (!type.GetTypeInfo().IsGenericType)
        {
            return type.GetFullNameWithoutNamespace()
                .ReplacePlusWithDotInNestedTypeName();
        }

        return type.GetGenericTypeDefinition()
            .GetFullNameWithoutNamespace()
            .ReplacePlusWithDotInNestedTypeName()
            .ReplaceGenericParametersInGenericTypeName(type);
    }

    private static string GetFullNameWithoutNamespace(this Type type)
    {
        if (type.IsGenericParameter)
        {
            return type.Name;
        }

        const int dotLength = 1;
        // ReSharper disable once PossibleNullReferenceException
        return !String.IsNullOrEmpty(type.Namespace)
            ? type.FullName.Substring(type.Namespace.Length + dotLength)
            : type.FullName;
    }

    private static string ReplacePlusWithDotInNestedTypeName(this string typeName)
    {
        return typeName.Replace('+', '.');
    }

    private static string ReplaceGenericParametersInGenericTypeName(this string typeName, Type type)
    {
        var genericArguments = type.GetTypeInfo().GetAllGenericArguments();

        const string regexForGenericArguments = @"`[1-9]\d*";

        var rgx = new Regex(regexForGenericArguments);

        typeName = rgx.Replace(typeName, match =>
        {
            var currentGenericArgumentNumbers = int.Parse(match.Value.Substring(1));
            var currentArguments = string.Join(",", genericArguments.Take(currentGenericArgumentNumbers).Select(ToGenericTypeString));
            genericArguments = genericArguments.Skip(currentGenericArgumentNumbers).ToArray();
            return string.Concat("<", currentArguments, ">");
        });

        return typeName;
    }

    public static Type[] GetAllGenericArguments(this TypeInfo type)
    {
        return type.GenericTypeArguments.Length > 0 ? type.GenericTypeArguments : type.GenericTypeParameters;
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

RecurringJobManagerExtensions:

public static class RecurringJobManagerExtensions
{
    public static void AddOrUpdate(this IRecurringJobManager manager, Expression<Action> methodCall, Func<string> cronExpression, TimeZoneInfo timeZone = null, string queue = EnqueuedState.DefaultQueue)
    {
        var job = Job.FromExpression(methodCall);
        var id = $"{job.Type.ToGenericTypeString()}.{job.Method.Name}";

        manager.AddOrUpdate(id, job, cronExpression(), timeZone ?? TimeZoneInfo.Utc, queue);
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

注入控制器IRecurringJobManager

public class SubmissionController : Controller
{
    private readonly IRecurringJobManager recurringJobManager;

    public SubmissionController(IRecurringJobManager recurringJobManager)
    {
        this.recurringJobManager = recurringJobManager;
    }

    public IActionResult Post()
    {
        recurringJobManager.AddOrUpdate(() => InitiateSubmission(), Cron.Minutely);

        return Ok("Periodic submission triggered");
    }

    public void InitiateSubmission()
    {
        // ...
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

好吧,这种方法会行得通,但是我不喜欢它。它基于一些将来可能会更改的内部Hangfire内容。

这就是为什么我建议使用另一种方法。您可以添加新的Facade接口(例如IRecurringJobFacade),以模仿RecurringJob您将要使用的方法。该接口的实现将只调用相应的RecurringJob方法。然后将其注入IRecurringJobFacade到控制器中,并可以轻松地在UT中对其进行模拟。这是一个示例:

IRecurringJobFacade:

public interface IRecurringJobFacade
{
    void AddOrUpdate(Expression<Action> methodCall, Func<string> cronExpression);

    //  Mimic other methods from RecurringJob that you are going to use.
    // ...
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

循环作业门面:

public class RecurringJobFacade : IRecurringJobFacade
{
    public void AddOrUpdate(Expression<Action> methodCall, Func<string> cronExpression)
    {
        RecurringJob.AddOrUpdate(methodCall, cronExpression);
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

注入控制器IRecurringJobFacade

public class SubmissionController : Controller
{
    private readonly IRecurringJobFacade recurringJobFacade;

    public SubmissionController(IRecurringJobFacade recurringJobFacade)
    {
        this.recurringJobFacade = recurringJobFacade;
    }

    public IActionResult Post()
    {
        recurringJobFacade.AddOrUpdate(() => InitiateSubmission(), Cron.Minutely);

        return Ok("Periodic submission triggered");
    }

    public void InitiateSubmission()
    {
        // ...
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

如您所见,这种方法更加简单,而且最重要的是它更加可靠,因为它不会深入研究Hangfire的内部原理,而是RecurringJob像往常一样调用方法。

当无法直接模拟代码(静态方法或不基于接口的类)时,通常使用这种外观接口。其他一些例子,我在我的实践中已经使用:模拟的System.IO.FileDateTime.NowSystem.Timers.Timer,等。