Nak*_*lon 84
String#squeeze有一个可选参数来指定要挤压的字符.
irb> "asd  asd asd   asd".squeeze(" ")
=> "asd asd asd asd"
kur*_*umi 44
>> str = "foo  bar   bar      baaar"
=> "foo  bar   bar      baaar"
>> str.split.join(" ")
=> "foo bar bar baaar"
>>
the*_*Man 25
从@ zetetic的答案更新了基准:
require 'benchmark'
include Benchmark
string = "foo  bar   bar      baaar"
n = 1_000_000
bm(12) do |x|
  x.report("gsub      ")   { n.times { string.gsub(/\s+/, " ") } }
  x.report("squeeze(' ')") { n.times { string.squeeze(' ') } }
  x.report("split/join")   { n.times { string.split.join(" ") } }
end
运行两次后,在桌面上运行时会产生这些值:
ruby test.rb; ruby test.rb
                  user     system      total        real
gsub          6.060000   0.000000   6.060000 (  6.061435)
squeeze(' ')  4.200000   0.010000   4.210000 (  4.201619)
split/join    3.620000   0.000000   3.620000 (  3.614499)
                  user     system      total        real
gsub          6.020000   0.000000   6.020000 (  6.023391)
squeeze(' ')  4.150000   0.010000   4.160000 (  4.153204)
split/join    3.590000   0.000000   3.590000 (  3.587590)
问题是squeeze删除任何重复的字符,这会导致不同的输出字符串,并且不符合OP的需要.squeeze(' ')确实满足了需求,但减慢了运营速度.
string.squeeze
 => "fo bar bar bar"
我正在考虑如何split.join更快,并且似乎不会用大字符串,所以我调整基准测试以查看长字符串会产生什么影响:
require 'benchmark'
include Benchmark
string = (["foo  bar   bar      baaar"] * 10_000).join
puts "String length: #{ string.length } characters"
n = 100
bm(12) do |x|
  x.report("gsub      ")   { n.times { string.gsub(/\s+/, " ") } }
  x.report("squeeze(' ')") { n.times { string.squeeze(' ') } }
  x.report("split/join")   { n.times { string.split.join(" ") } }
end
ruby test.rb ; ruby test.rb
String length: 250000 characters
                  user     system      total        real
gsub          2.570000   0.010000   2.580000 (  2.576149)
squeeze(' ')  0.140000   0.000000   0.140000 (  0.150298)
split/join    1.400000   0.010000   1.410000 (  1.396078)
String length: 250000 characters
                  user     system      total        real
gsub          2.570000   0.010000   2.580000 (  2.573802)
squeeze(' ')  0.140000   0.000000   0.140000 (  0.150384)
split/join    1.400000   0.010000   1.410000 (  1.397748)
因此,长线确实有很大的不同.
如果你确实使用gsub,那么gsub /\s {2,} /,'')会稍快一些.
并不是的.这是一个测试该断言的基准测试版本:
require 'benchmark'
include Benchmark
string = "foo  bar   bar      baaar"
puts string.gsub(/\s+/, " ")
puts string.gsub(/\s{2,}/, ' ')
puts string.gsub(/\s\s+/, " ")
string = (["foo  bar   bar      baaar"] * 10_000).join
puts "String length: #{ string.length } characters"
n = 100
bm(18) do |x|
  x.report("gsub")               { n.times { string.gsub(/\s+/, " ") } }
  x.report('gsub/\s{2,}/, "")')  { n.times { string.gsub(/\s{2,}/, ' ') } }
  x.report("gsub2")              { n.times { string.gsub(/\s\s+/, " ") } }
end
# >> foo bar bar baaar
# >> foo bar bar baaar
# >> foo bar bar baaar
# >> String length: 250000 characters
# >>                          user     system      total        real
# >> gsub                 1.380000   0.010000   1.390000 (  1.381276)
# >> gsub/\s{2,}/, "")    1.590000   0.000000   1.590000 (  1.609292)
# >> gsub2                1.050000   0.010000   1.060000 (  1.051005)
如果你想要速度,请使用gsub2.squeeze(' ')仍然会围绕一个gsub实现运行圈子.
tok*_*and 21
要补充其他答案,请注意Activesupport和Facets都提供String#squish([update]警告:它还会删除字符串中的换行符):
>> "foo  bar   bar      baaar".squish
=> "foo bar bar baaar"
使用正则表达式匹配重复的空格(\s+)并用空格替换它.
"foo    bar  foobar".gsub(/\s+/, ' ')
=> "foo bar foobar"
这匹配每个空格,因为您只想替换空格,/ +/而不是使用/\s+/.
"foo    bar  \nfoobar".gsub(/ +/, ' ')
=> "foo bar \nfoobar"
哪种方法表现更好?
$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [i686-linux]
$ cat squeeze.rb 
require 'benchmark'
include Benchmark
string = "foo  bar   bar      baaar"
n = 1_000_000
bm(6) do |x|
  x.report("gsub      ") { n.times { string.gsub(/\s+/, " ") } }
  x.report("squeeze   ") { n.times { string.squeeze } }
  x.report("split/join") { n.times { string.split.join(" ") } }
end
$ ruby squeeze.rb 
            user     system      total        real
gsub        4.970000   0.020000   4.990000 (  5.624229)
squeeze     0.600000   0.000000   0.600000 (  0.677733)
split/join  2.950000   0.020000   2.970000 (  3.243022)