Aam*_*ail 45 java stringbuilder multithreading thread-safety
如何以编程方式证明StringBuilder
不是线程安全的?
我尝试过这个,但它不起作用:
public class Threadsafe {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
long startdate = System.currentTimeMillis();
MyThread1 mt1 = new MyThread1();
Thread t = new Thread(mt1);
MyThread2 mt2 = new MyThread2();
Thread t0 = new Thread(mt2);
t.start();
t0.start();
t.join();
t0.join();
long enddate = System.currentTimeMillis();
long time = enddate - startdate;
System.out.println(time);
}
String str = "aamir";
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str);
public void updateme() {
sb.deleteCharAt(2);
System.out.println(sb.toString());
}
public void displayme() {
sb.append("b");
System.out.println(sb.toString());
}
}
class MyThread1 implements Runnable {
Threadsafe sf = new Threadsafe();
public void run() {
sf.updateme();
}
}
class MyThread2 implements Runnable {
Threadsafe sf = new Threadsafe();
public void run() {
sf.displayme();
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
And*_*lko 111
我担心你写的测试是不正确的.
主要要求是StringBuilder
在不同线程之间共享相同的实例.而您正在StringBuilder
为每个线程创建一个对象.
问题是new Threadsafe()
初始化a new StringBuilder()
:
class Threadsafe {
...
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str);
...
}
class MyThread1 implements Runnable {
Threadsafe sf = new Threadsafe();
...
}
class MyThread2 implements Runnable {
Threadsafe sf = new Threadsafe();
...
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为了证明StringBuilder
类不是线程安全的,你需要编写一个测试,其中n
threads(n > 1
)同时将一些东西附加到同一个实例.
了解您要追加的所有内容的大小,您将能够将此值与以下结果进行比较builder.toString().length()
:
final long SIZE = 1000; // max stream size
final StringBuilder builder = Stream
.generate(() -> "a") // generate an infinite stream of "a"
.limit(SIZE) // make it finite
.parallel() // make it parallel
.reduce(new StringBuilder(), StringBuilder::append, (b1, b2) -> b1);
// put each element in the builder
Assert.assertEquals(SIZE, builder.toString().length());
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
由于它实际上不是线程安全的,因此您可能无法获得结果.
的ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
,因为可以抛出char[] AbstractStringBuilder#value
阵列和其并非设计用于多线程使用分配机制.
这是我的JUnit 5测试,涵盖了两个StringBuilder
和StringBuffer
:
public class AbstractStringBuilderTest {
@RepeatedTest(10000)
public void testStringBuilder() {
testAbstractStringBuilder(new StringBuilder(), StringBuilder::append);
}
@RepeatedTest(10000)
public void testStringBuffer() {
testAbstractStringBuilder(new StringBuffer(), StringBuffer::append);
}
private <T extends CharSequence> void testAbstractStringBuilder(T builder, BiFunction<T, ? super String, T> accumulator) {
final long SIZE = 1000;
final Supplier<String> GENERATOR = () -> "a";
final CharSequence sequence = Stream
.generate(GENERATOR)
.parallel()
.limit(SIZE)
.reduce(builder, accumulator, (b1, b2) -> b1);
Assertions.assertEquals(
SIZE * GENERATOR.get().length(), // expected
sequence.toString().length() // actual
);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
AbstractStringBuilderTest.testStringBuilder:
10000 total, 165 error, 5988 failed, 3847 passed.
AbstractStringBuilderTest.testStringBuffer:
10000 total, 10000 passed.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Eug*_*ene 18
更简单:
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
IntStream.range(0, 10)
.parallel()
.peek(sb::append) // don't do this! just to prove a point...
.boxed()
.collect(Collectors.toList());
if (sb.toString().length() != 10) {
System.out.println(sb.toString());
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
没有数字的顺序(它们不会012...
等等),但这是你不关心的事情.所有你关心的是,并非所有数字都来自[0..10]
添加到的范围StringBuilder
.
另一方面,如果替换StringBuilder
为StringBuffer
,则总是会在该缓冲区中获得10个元素(但是不按顺序).
alx*_*112 11
考虑以下测试.
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import org.junit.Assert;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
public class NotThreadSafe {
private static final int CHARS_PER_THREAD = 1_000_000;
private static final int NUMBER_OF_THREADS = 4;
private StringBuilder builder;
@Before
public void setUp() {
builder = new StringBuilder();
}
@Test
public void testStringBuilder() throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
Runnable appender = () -> {
for (int i = 0; i < CHARS_PER_THREAD; i++) {
builder.append('A');
}
};
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(NUMBER_OF_THREADS);
List<Future<?>> futures = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_THREADS; i++) {
futures.add(executorService.submit(appender));
}
for (Future<?> future : futures) {
future.get();
}
executorService.shutdown();
String builtString = builder.toString();
Assert.assertEquals(CHARS_PER_THREAD * NUMBER_OF_THREADS, builtString.length());
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是为了证明通过矛盾方法证明StringBuilder
不是线程安全的.运行时,它总是抛出异常,如下所示:
java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 73726
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
at NotThreadSafe.testStringBuilder(NotThreadSafe.java:37)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:71)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:288)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:58)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:268)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:137)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:47)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:242)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:70)
Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 73726
at java.lang.AbstractStringBuilder.append(AbstractStringBuilder.java:650)
at java.lang.StringBuilder.append(StringBuilder.java:202)
at NotThreadSafe.lambda$testStringBuilder$0(NotThreadSafe.java:28)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因此,StringBuilder
当被多个线程使用时会被破坏.