mis*_*tor 6 functional-programming scala akka akka-stream
是否有一个Akka溪流组合器用于执行以下操作(或具有相应效果的东西)?(我们and现在就叫它.)
(flow1: Flow[I, O, Mat]).and[O2](flow2: Flow[I, O2, Mat]): Flow[I, (O, O2), Mat]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
语义是无论什么来源,它的元素都将被传递给两个Flows,它们的输出将被组合成一个新Flow的元组.(对于熟悉类别理论风格函数式编程的箭头的人,我正在寻找类似的东西&&&.)
库中有两个看起来相关的组合器,即zip和alsoTo.但前者接受a SourceShape,后者接受a SinkShape.两者都不会承认GraphShape.为什么会这样?
我的用例如下:
someSource
.via(someFlowThatReturnsUnit.and(Flow.apply))
.runWith(someSink)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
没找到类似的东西.and,我修改了我原来的Flow样子:
someSource
.via(someFlowThatDoesWhateverItWasDoingEarlierButNowAlsoEmitsInputsAsIs)
.runWith(someSink)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这有效,但我正在寻找更清洁,更具成分性的解决方案.
注意
正如Viktor Klang在评论中所指出的那样:Tuple2[O,O2]只有当知道两个流,flow1&flow2,相对于输入元素数和输出元素数是1:1 时,压缩到a 才可行.
图形解决方案
可以在Graph内部创建元组构造.事实上,您的问题几乎完全符合介绍性示例:
val g = RunnableGraph.fromGraph(GraphDSL.create() { implicit builder: GraphDSL.Builder[NotUsed] =>
import GraphDSL.Implicits._
val in = Source(1 to 10)
val out = Sink.ignore
val bcast = builder.add(Broadcast[Int](2))
val merge = builder.add(Zip[Int, Int]()) //different than link
val f1, f2, f4 = Flow[Int].map(_ + 10)
val f3 = Flow[(Int, Int)].map(t => t._1 + t._2) //different than link
in ~> f1 ~> bcast ~> f2 ~> merge ~> f3 ~> out
bcast ~> f4 ~> merge
ClosedShape
})//end RunnableGraph.fromGraph
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有点Hacky流解决方案
如果您正在寻找纯流解决方案,则可以使用中间流,但Mat不会维护,并且它涉及为每个输入元素实现2个流的实现:
def andFlows[I, O, O2] (maxConcurrentSreams : Int)
(flow1: Flow[I, O, NotUsed], flow2: Flow[I, O2, NotUsed])
(implicit mat : Materializer, ec : ExecutionContext) : Flow[I, (O, O2), _] =
Flow[I].mapAsync(maxConcurrentStreams){ i =>
val o : Future[O] = Source
.single(i)
.via(flow1)
.to(Sink.head[O])
.run()
val o2 : Future[O2] = Source
.single(i)
.via(flow2)
.to(Sink.head[O2])
.run()
o zip o2
}//end Flow[I].mapAsync
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
通用拉链
如果你想使这个压缩通用,对于大多数流,那么输出类型必须是(Seq[O], Seq[O2]).可以通过使用Sink.seq而不是Sink.head在上面的andFlows函数中生成此类型:
def genericAndFlows[I, O, O2] (maxConcurrentSreams : Int)
(flow1: Flow[I, O, NotUsed], flow2: Flow[I, O2, NotUsed])
(implicit mat : Materializer, ec : ExecutionContext) : Flow[I, (Seq[O], Seq[O2]), _] =
Flow[I].mapAsync(maxConcurrentStreams){ i =>
val o : Future[Seq[O]] = Source
.single(i)
.via(flow1)
.to(Sink.seq[O])
.run()
val o2 : Future[Seq[O2]] = Source
.single(i)
.via(flow2)
.to(Sink.seq[O2])
.run()
o zip o2
}//end Flow[I].mapAsync
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)