awe*_*use 4 ruby testing api rspec ruby-on-rails
正如标题所示,我只是想用 RSpec 测试我的 API 控制器中的创建操作。控制器看起来像:
module Api
module V1
class BathroomController < ApplicationController
skip_before_action :verify_authenticity_token, only: [:create]`
def create
bathroom = Bathroom.new(bathroom_params)
bathroom.user = current_user
if bathroom.save
render json: { status: 'SUCCESS', message: 'Saved new bathroom', bathrooms: bathroom }, status: :ok
end
end
private
def bathroom_params
params.require(:bathroom).permit(:establishment, :address, :city, :state, :zip, :gender, :key_needed, :toilet_quantity)
end
end
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在这正是它应该做的,这很棒。然而,测试......不是那么多。这是我对测试部分的了解:
describe "POST #create" do
let!(:bath) {{
establishment: "Fake Place",
address: "123 Main St",
city: "Cityton",
state: "NY",
zip: "11111",
gender: "Unisex",
key_needed: false,
toilet_quantity: 1
}}
let!(:params) { {bathroom: bath} }
it "receives bathroom data and creates a new bathroom" do
post :create, params: params
bathroom = Bathroom.last
expect(bathroom.establishment).to eq "Fake Place"
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我确信这里有不止一件事错误,但我很难找到有关测试此正确方法的大量信息。任何见解或建议将不胜感激。
我会完全跳过控制器规格。Rails 5 几乎已将ActionController::TestCase(RSpec 包装为控制器规范)委托给垃圾抽屉。控制器测试不会发送真正的 http 请求,也不会对 Rails 的关键部分(如路由器和中间件)进行存根。很快就会发生完全的贬低和委托给一个单独的宝石。
相反,您想使用请求规范。
RSpec.describe "API V1 Bathrooms", type: 'request' do
describe "POST /api/v1/bathrooms" do
context "with valid parameters" do
let(:valid_params) do
{
bathroom: {
establishment: "Fake Place",
address: "123 Main St",
city: "Cityton",
state: "NY",
zip: "11111",
gender: "Unisex",
key_needed: false,
toilet_quantity: 1
}
}
end
it "creates a new bathroom" do
expect { post "/api/v1/bathrooms", params: valid_params }.to change(Bathroom, :count).by(+1)
expect(response).to have_http_status :created
expect(response.headers['Location']).to eq api_v1_bathroom_url(Bathroom.last)
end
it "creates a bathroom with the correct attributes" do
post "/api/v1/bathrooms", params: valid_params
expect(Bathroom.last).to have_attributes valid_params[:bathroom]
end
end
context "with invalid parameters" do
# testing for validation failures is just as important!
# ...
end
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
同样发送一堆垃圾 render json: { status: 'SUCCESS', message: 'Saved new bathroom', bathrooms: bathroom }, status: :ok是一种反模式。
作为响应,您应该只发送带有位置标头的 201 CREATED 响应,其中包含指向新创建资源的 url 或包含新创建资源的响应正文。
def create
bathroom = current_user.bathrooms.new(bathroom_params)
if bathroom.save
head :created, location: api_v1_bathroom_url(bathroom)
else
head :unprocessable_entity
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果您的客户无法通过查看响应代码判断响应是否成功,那么您做错了。
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
9062 次 |
| 最近记录: |