我观察到一些我无法解释的奇怪行为.代码如下所示:
#include <memory>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
int main(){
std::vector<double> t1(10, 5.0);
std::vector<double*> t2(10);
std::transform(t1.begin(), t1.end(), t2.begin(), std::addressof<double>);
//std::transform(t1.begin(), t1.end(), t2.begin(), [](double& a){return &a;});
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这里有一个版本来玩https://godbolt.org/g/YcNdbf 问题是这个代码使用gcc4.9-6.3编译好但在gcc 7.1下失败.Clang也不喜欢它.
(编辑)来自gcc 7.1的错误消息:
<source>: In function 'int main()':
8 : <source>:8:76: error: no matching function for call to 'transform(std::vector<double>::iterator, std::vector<double>::iterator, std::vector<double*>::iterator, <unresolved overloaded function type>)'
std::transform(t1.begin(), t1.end(), t2.begin(), std::addressof<double>);
^
In file included from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-7.1.0/include/c++/7.1.0/algorithm:62:0,
from <source>:3:
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-7.1.0/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/stl_algo.h:4281:5: note: candidate: template<class _IIter, class _OIter, class _UnaryOperation> _OIter std::transform(_IIter, _IIter, _OIter, _UnaryOperation)
transform(_InputIterator __first, _InputIterator __last,
^~~~~~~~~
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-7.1.0/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/stl_algo.h:4281:5: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
8 : <source>:8:76: note: could not resolve address from overloaded function 'addressof<double>'
std::transform(t1.begin(), t1.end(), t2.begin(), std::addressof<double>);
^
In file included from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-7.1.0/include/c++/7.1.0/algorithm:62:0,
from <source>:3:
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-7.1.0/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/stl_algo.h:4318:5: note: candidate: template<class _IIter1, class _IIter2, class _OIter, class _BinaryOperation> _OIter std::transform(_IIter1, _IIter1, _IIter2, _OIter, _BinaryOperation)
transform(_InputIterator1 __first1, _InputIterator1 __last1,
^~~~~~~~~
/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-7.1.0/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/stl_algo.h:4318:5: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
8 : <source>:8:76: note: could not resolve address from overloaded function 'addressof<double>'
std::transform(t1.begin(), t1.end(), t2.begin(), std::addressof<double>);
^
Compiler exited with result code 1
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但是,我无法弄清楚它为什么不起作用.
在此先感谢任何想要帮助的人:)
为避免意外获取临时地址,图书馆获得了第二个(已删除)签名addressof:
template <class T> constexpr T* addressof(T& r) noexcept;
template <class T> const T* addressof(const T&& elem) = delete;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
见http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#2598
所以现在编译器不知道你的代码是否应该与删除的函数匹配......
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
470 次 |
| 最近记录: |