Ste*_*vds 1 c# linq lambda linq-to-sql
我写了以下代码:
//get the user from the DB
var tmpuser = _db.aspnet_Users.First(q => q.UserName == user.Identity.Name);
//list the direct connections to Verbond
List<Verbond> verb1 = tmpuser.UsersVerbondens
.Where(q => q.Schooljaar.Sch_Schooljaar == schooljaarparam)
.Select(q => q.Verbond)
.ToList();
//list the connected Facturatieverbonden
List<FacturatieVerbonden> verb2 = tmpuser.UsersFacturatieVerbondens
.Where(q => q.Schooljaar.Sch_Schooljaar == schooljaarparam)
.Select(q => q.FacturatieVerbonden)
.ToList();
//loop through the facturatieverbonden and add their verbonds to the first list
foreach (FacturatieVerbonden v in verb2) {
verb1.AddRange(v.Verbonds);
}
//make a distinct list
List<Verbond> test = verb1.Distinct().ToList();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因此,用户可以连接到0或更多facturatieverbonden,也可以连接到verbond.
A 本身facturatieverbonden可以有一个或多个verbond.
我需要的是一个verbond用户连接到的所有用户的列表,直接或间接通过facturatieverbonden.
我的代码有效,但我认为它不是很有效.任何关于使其清洁的提示?
你的查询不是很LINQy.这是一个潜在的改进:
//list the direct connections to Verbond
var test = (from q in tmpuser.UsersVerbondens
where q.Schooljaar.Sch_Schooljaar == schooljaarparam
select q.Verbond)
//return distinct values
.Union
//list the connected Facturatieverbonden
(from q in tmpuser.UsersFacturatieVerbondens
where q.Schooljaar.Sch_Schooljaar == schooljaarparam
from v in q.FacturatieVerbonden.Verbonds
select v)
//return a List
.ToList();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
通过完成ToList最后的工作,整个计算可以在数据库中完成,避免所有中间列表.