Kon*_*rad 6 workflow conditional pipeline r dplyr
鉴于dplyr工作流程:
require(dplyr)
mtcars %>%
tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "model") %>%
filter(grepl(x = model, pattern = "Merc")) %>%
group_by(am) %>%
summarise(meanMPG = mean(mpg))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我有兴趣filter根据价值有条件地申请applyFilter.
对于applyFilter <- 1使用"Merc"字符串过滤行,而不使用过滤器返回所有行.
applyFilter <- 1
mtcars %>%
tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "model") %>%
filter(model %in%
if (applyFilter) {
rownames(mtcars)[grepl(x = rownames(mtcars), pattern = "Merc")]
} else
{
rownames(mtcars)
}) %>%
group_by(am) %>%
summarise(meanMPG = mean(mpg))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
建议的解决方案效率低,因为ifelse始终会评估调用; 更可取的方法只会评估filter步骤applyFilter <- 1.
在低效的工作液会像她那样:
mtcars %>%
tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "model") %>%
# Only apply filter step if condition is met
if (applyFilter) {
filter(grepl(x = model, pattern = "Merc"))
}
%>%
# Continue
group_by(am) %>%
summarise(meanMPG = mean(mpg))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
当然,上面的语法是不正确的.这只是理想的工作流程应该如何看待的例证.
我对创建一个临时对象不感兴趣; 工作流程应该类似于:
startingObject
%>%
...
conditional filter
...
final object
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)理想情况下,我想找到解决方案,我可以控制是否filter正在评估呼叫
tal*_*lat 11
这种方法怎么样:
mtcars %>%
tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "model") %>%
filter(if(applyfilter== 1) grepl(x = model, pattern = "Merc") else TRUE) %>%
group_by(am) %>%
summarise(meanMPG = mean(mpg))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
grepl仅当applyfilter为1时才会评估此方法,否则filter只需回收a TRUE.
或者另一种选择是使用{}:
mtcars %>%
tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "model") %>%
{if(applyfilter == 1) filter(., grepl(x = model, pattern = "Merc")) else .} %>%
group_by(am) %>%
summarise(meanMPG = mean(mpg))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
显然有另一种可能的方法,你只需要打破管道,有条件地做过滤器,然后继续管道(我知道OP没有要求这个,只想给其他读者另一个例子)
mtcars %<>%
tibble::rownames_to_column(var = "model")
if(applyfilter == 1) mtcars %<>% filter(grepl(x = model, pattern = "Merc"))
mtcars %>%
group_by(am) %>%
summarise(meanMPG = mean(mpg))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)