Ali*_* R. 12 sql postgresql sequences sequence
我有一张桌子foo.为了快速升级/部署我的网站,我创建了一个新表tmp_foo,以包含一些新数据:
create table tmp_foo (like foo including constraints including defaults including indexes);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在每个表都有一个PK id列,如下所示:
Column | Type | Modifiers
-------------+-----------------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------
id | integer | not null default nextval('foo_id_seq'::regclass)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
重要的是,两个表都依赖于完全相同的序列foo_id_seq.没有tmp_foo_id_seq.这对我来说似乎没问题.
在此之后,我加载tmp_foo了新数据并重命名了表格,以便tmp_foo接管真实foo,并且原始版本foo成为了foo_old.现在我试着放弃foo_old:
db=> drop table foo_old ;
ERROR: cannot drop table foo_old because other objects depend on it
DETAIL: default for table foo_old column id depends on sequence foo_id_seq
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
很公平,id列默认仍然取决于序列.
db=> alter table foo_old alter column id drop default;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是踢球者.
db=> drop table foo_old ;
ERROR: cannot drop table foo_old because other objects depend on it
DETAIL: default for table foo column id depends on sequence foo_id_seq
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因此foo_old不再对序列有任何可见的依赖性,但它仍然试图将序列与表一起删除(显然不会因为新表依赖于它).
所以问题是两部分:
(在PostgreSQL 8.4上)
a_h*_*ame 27
试试这个:
ALTER SEQUENCE foo_id_seq OWNED BY NONE
然后你应该能够放弃桌子.
要检索序列的"所有者",请使用以下查询
SELECT s.relname as sequence_name,
n.nspname as sequence_schema,
t.relname as related_table,
a.attname as related_column
FROM pg_class s, pg_depend d, pg_class t, pg_attribute a, pg_namespace n
WHERE s.relkind = 'S'
AND n.oid = s.relnamespace
AND d.objid = s.oid
AND d.refobjid = t.oid
AND (d.refobjid, d.refobjsubid) = (a.attrelid, a.attnum)