var result = table1.Join(table2, o => o.ProgramID, t => t.ProgramID, (o, t) => new { o.ProgramID, t.Program })
.OrderBy(t => t.Program)
.Distinct();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
上面的linq语句实际上返回了正确的结果,但是他生成的sql(下面)并不是那么简单
SELECT [t2].[ProgramID], [t2].[Program]
FROM (
SELECT DISTINCT [t0].[ProgramID], [t1].[Program]
FROM [table1] AS [t0]
INNER JOIN [table2] AS [t1] ON [t0].[ProgramID] = [t1].[ProgramID]
) AS [t2]
ORDER BY [t2].[Program]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我本以为下面的sql更清晰,但我不确定实现它的linq语句.
select distinct
o.ProgramID,
t.Program
from
table1 0
inner join table2 t on t.ProgramID = o.ProgramID
order by t.Program
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
提前致谢
Ale*_*dez 30
我不知道它是否会有所帮助,但你可以尝试这样的事情;
var result = (from o in table1
join t in table2 on o.ProgramID equals t.ProgramID
orderby t.Program
select new { o.ProgramID, t.Program }).Distinct();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
use*_*040 11
我试过这个并且有效:
var result = (from o in table1
join t in table2 on o.ProgramID equals t.ProgramID
select new { o.ProgramID, t.Program })
.Distinct().OrderBy(t => t.Program)
.ThenBy(t => t.ProgramName)
.ThenBy(t => t.Description);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
首先你做Distinct然后OrderBy,然后OrderBy工作.
分析两个查询,比较 stats-IO 和实际执行计划。完全有可能对SQL服务器造成零差异。
如果您确实想要已知的 TSQL,请使用 ExecuteQuery-of-T 并自行传入 TSQL。也许还包括一些锁定提示(最常见的是:NOLOCK)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
46999 次 |
| 最近记录: |