我有一个包含6列和678,552行的csv文件.不幸的是,我不能共享任何数据样本,但类型是直截了当:int64,int64,date,date,string,string并且没有缺失值.
是时候在R中的数据帧中加载这些数据read.table:~3秒.
是时候在F#中使用CsvFile.Load加载这些数据:~3秒.
是时候在F#中的Deedle数据帧中加载这些数据:~7秒.
向inferTypes=falseDeedle 添加并提供架构Frame.ReadCsv可将时间缩短至约3秒
是时候在F#中使用CsvProvider加载这些数据:~5分钟.
在我定义Schema参数中的类型后,这5分钟甚至可以消除F#用来推断它们的时间.
我知道类型提供程序需要做的不仅仅是R或CsvFile.Load,以便将数据解析为正确的数据类型,但我对x100速度惩罚感到惊讶.更令人困惑的是Deedle加载数据所需的时间,因为它还需要推断类型和适当的转换,组合系列等.我实际上预计Deedle需要比CsvProvider更长的时间.
在这个问题中,CsvProvider的不良性能是由大量的列引起的,这不是我的情况.
我想知道我是做错了什么,或者是否有任何方法可以加快速度.
只是为了澄清:创建提供者几乎是即时的.当我迫使生成的序列被实现时,Seq.length df.Rowsfsharpi提示返回需要大约5分钟.
我在Linux系统上,单声道v4.6.1上的F#v4.1.
这是CsvProvider的代码
let [<Literal>] SEP = "|"
let [<Literal>] CULTURE = "sv-SE"
let [<Literal>] DATAFILE = dataroot + "all_diagnoses.csv"
type DiagnosesProvider = CsvProvider<DATAFILE, Separators=SEP, Culture=CULTURE>
let diagnoses = DiagnosesProvider()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
EDIT1: 我添加了Deedle将数据加载到帧中的时间.
EDIT2:
添加了Deedle所采用的时间inferTypes=false和提供的模式.
此外,CacheRows=false按照注释中的建议在CsvProvider中提供对加载时间没有明显影响.
EDIT3:
好的,我们到了某个地方.由于一些特殊的原因,它似乎Culture是罪魁祸首.如果我省略这个参数,CsvProvider会在~7秒内加载数据.我不确定是什么原因引起的.我的系统的语言环境是en_US.但是,数据来自瑞典语语言环境中的SQL Server,其中十进制数字由","而不是"."分隔.这个特定的数据集没有任何小数,所以我可以完全省略Culture.然而,另一组有2个十进制列和超过1,000,000行.我的下一个任务是在Windows系统上对此进行测试,目前我还没有.
编辑4: 问题似乎已经解决但我仍然不明白是什么导致它.如果我通过以下方式"全球化"改变文化:
System.Globalization.CultureInfo.DefaultThreadCurrentCulture = CultureInfo("sv-SE")
System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = CultureInfo("sv-SE")
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后Culture="sv-SE"从CsvProvider中删除参数,加载时间减少到约6秒,并正确解析小数.如果有人能对这种行为作出解释,我将保持开放状态.
我正在尝试重现您所看到的问题,因为您无法共享我尝试生成一些测试数据的数据.但是,在我的机器上(.NET 4.6.2 F#4.1)我看不到它需要几分钟,需要几秒钟.
也许您可以尝试查看我的示例应用程序在您的设置中的执行情况,我们可以从中工作吗?
open System
open System.Diagnostics
open System.IO
let clock =
let sw = Stopwatch ()
sw.Start ()
fun () ->
sw.ElapsedMilliseconds
let time a =
let before = clock ()
let v = a ()
let after = clock ()
after - before, v
let generateDataSet () =
let random = Random 19740531
let firstDate = DateTime(1970, 1, 1)
let randomInt () = random.Next () |> int64 |> (+) 10000000000L |> string
let randomDate () = (firstDate + (random.Next () |> float |> TimeSpan.FromSeconds)).ToString("s")
let randomString () =
let inline valid ch =
match ch with
| '"'
| '\\' -> ' '
| _ -> ch
let c = random.Next () % 16
let g i =
if i = 0 || i = c + 1 then '"'
else 32 + random.Next() % (127 - 32) |> char |> valid
Array.init (c + 2) g |> String
let columns =
[|
"Id" , randomInt
"ForeignId" , randomInt
"BirthDate" , randomDate
"OtherDate" , randomDate
"FirstName" , randomString
"LastName" , randomString
|]
use sw = new StreamWriter ("perf.csv")
let headers = columns |> Array.map fst |> String.concat ";"
sw.WriteLine headers
for i = 0 to 700000 do
let values = columns |> Array.map (fun (_, f) -> f ()) |> String.concat ";"
sw.WriteLine values
open FSharp.Data
[<Literal>]
let sample = """Id;ForeignId;BirthDate;OtherDate;FirstName;LastName
11795679844;10287417237;2028-09-14T20:33:17;1993-07-21T17:03:25;",xS@ %aY)N*})Z";"ZP~;"
11127366946;11466785219;2028-02-22T08:39:57;2026-01-24T05:07:53;"H-/QA(";"g8}J?k~"
"""
type PerfFile = CsvProvider<sample, ";">
let readDataWithTp () =
use streamReader = new StreamReader ("perf.csv")
let csvFile = PerfFile.Load streamReader
let length = csvFile.Rows |> Seq.length
printfn "%A" length
[<EntryPoint>]
let main argv =
Environment.CurrentDirectory <- AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory
printfn "Generating dataset..."
let ms, _ = time generateDataSet
printfn " took %d ms" ms
printfn "Reading dataset..."
let ms, _ = time readDataWithTp
printfn " took %d ms" ms
0
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
性能数字(我桌面上的.NET462):
Generating dataset...
took 2162 ms
Reading dataset...
took 6156 ms
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
性能数字(Macbook Pro上的Mono 4.6.2):
Generating dataset...
took 4432 ms
Reading dataset...
took 8304 ms
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
更新
事实证明,明确指定CultureCsvProvider似乎会降低性能.它可以是任何文化,不仅仅是sv-SE为什么?
如果检查提供者为快速和慢速情况生成的代码,则会发现差异:
快速
internal sealed class csvFile@78
{
internal System.Tuple<long, long, System.DateTime, System.DateTime, string, string> Invoke(object arg1, string[] arg2)
{
Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption<string> fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[0]);
long arg_C9_0 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<long>("Id", TextRuntime.ConvertInteger64("", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[1]);
long arg_C9_1 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<long>("ForeignId", TextRuntime.ConvertInteger64("", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[2]);
System.DateTime arg_C9_2 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<System.DateTime>("BirthDate", TextRuntime.ConvertDateTime("", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[3]);
System.DateTime arg_C9_3 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<System.DateTime>("OtherDate", TextRuntime.ConvertDateTime("", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[4]);
string arg_C9_4 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<string>("FirstName", TextRuntime.ConvertString(fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[5]);
return new System.Tuple<long, long, System.DateTime, System.DateTime, string, string>(arg_C9_0, arg_C9_1, arg_C9_2, arg_C9_3, arg_C9_4, TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<string>("LastName", TextRuntime.ConvertString(fSharpOption), fSharpOption));
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
慢
internal sealed class csvFile@78
{
internal System.Tuple<long, long, System.DateTime, System.DateTime, string, string> Invoke(object arg1, string[] arg2)
{
Microsoft.FSharp.Core.FSharpOption<string> fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[0]);
long arg_C9_0 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<long>("Id", TextRuntime.ConvertInteger64("sv-SE", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[1]);
long arg_C9_1 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<long>("ForeignId", TextRuntime.ConvertInteger64("sv-SE", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[2]);
System.DateTime arg_C9_2 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<System.DateTime>("BirthDate", TextRuntime.ConvertDateTime("sv-SE", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[3]);
System.DateTime arg_C9_3 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<System.DateTime>("OtherDate", TextRuntime.ConvertDateTime("sv-SE", fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[4]);
string arg_C9_4 = TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<string>("FirstName", TextRuntime.ConvertString(fSharpOption), fSharpOption);
fSharpOption = TextConversions.AsString(arg2[5]);
return new System.Tuple<long, long, System.DateTime, System.DateTime, string, string>(arg_C9_0, arg_C9_1, arg_C9_2, arg_C9_3, arg_C9_4, TextRuntime.GetNonOptionalValue<string>("LastName", TextRuntime.ConvertString(fSharpOption), fSharpOption));
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
更具体地说,这是区别:
// Fast
TextRuntime.ConvertDateTime("", fSharpOption), fSharpOption)
// Slow
TextRuntime.ConvertDateTime("sv-SE", fSharpOption), fSharpOption)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
当我们指定一种文化时,会传递给ConvertDateTime它GetCulture
static member GetCulture(cultureStr) =
if String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace cultureStr
then CultureInfo.InvariantCulture
else CultureInfo cultureStr
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这意味着对于默认情况,我们使用CultureInfo.InvariantCulture但对于每个字段和行的任何其他情况,我们正在创建一个CultureInfo对象.缓存可以完成,但事实并非如此.创建过程本身似乎不会占用太多时间,但每当我们使用新CultureInfo对象进行解析时会发生一些事情.
解析DateTime在FSharp.Data本质上是这样的
let dateTimeStyles = DateTimeStyles.AllowWhiteSpaces ||| DateTimeStyles.RoundtripKind
match DateTime.TryParse(text, cultureInfo, dateTimeStyles) with
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因此,让我们进行性能测试,我们使用缓存CultureInfo对象和另一个我们每次创建一个缓存对象的对象.
open System
open System.Diagnostics
open System.Globalization
let clock =
let sw = Stopwatch ()
sw.Start ()
fun () ->
sw.ElapsedMilliseconds
let time a =
let before = clock ()
let v = a ()
let after = clock ()
after - before, v
let perfTest c cf () =
let dateTimeStyles = DateTimeStyles.AllowWhiteSpaces ||| DateTimeStyles.RoundtripKind
let text = DateTime.Now.ToString ("", cf ())
for i = 1 to c do
let culture = cf ()
DateTime.TryParse(text, culture, dateTimeStyles) |> ignore
[<EntryPoint>]
let main argv =
Environment.CurrentDirectory <- AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory
let ct = "sv-SE"
let cct = CultureInfo ct
let count = 10000
printfn "Using cached CultureInfo object..."
let ms, _ = time (perfTest count (fun () -> cct))
printfn " took %d ms" ms
printfn "Using fresh CultureInfo object..."
let ms, _ = time (perfTest count (fun () -> CultureInfo ct))
printfn " took %d ms" ms
0
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
.NET 4.6.2 F#4.1上的性能数字:
Using cached CultureInfo object...
took 16 ms
Using fresh CultureInfo object...
took 5328 ms
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
因此,当指定文化时,似乎缓存CultureInfo对象FSharp.Data应该CsvProvider显着提高性能.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
334 次 |
| 最近记录: |