Ruby Net :: OpenTimeout:执行过期

ela*_*ado 8 ruby

我一直在我的机器上的几台主机上收到此错误,例如:

require 'open-uri'
open('https://google.com').read


Net::OpenTimeout: execution expired
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/net/http.rb:904:in `initialize'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/net/http.rb:904:in `open'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/net/http.rb:904:in `block in connect'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/timeout.rb:103:in `timeout'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/net/http.rb:902:in `connect'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/net/http.rb:887:in `do_start'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/net/http.rb:876:in `start'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:323:in `open_http'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:741:in `buffer_open'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:212:in `block in open_loop'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:210:in `catch'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:210:in `open_loop'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:151:in `open_uri'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:721:in `open'
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/lib/ruby/2.4.0/open-uri.rb:35:in `open'
    from (irb):3
    from /usr/local/opt/rbenv/versions/2.4.0/bin/irb:11:in `<main>'
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

不会发生在其他人身上

open('https://twitter.com').read
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

来自rbenv和macOS 10.12.3的Ruby 2.4.0.还测试了Ruby 2.0.0 - macOS上的系统版本.

当我curl或使用Node 时,我没有得到任何错误和预期的结果request.所以这不是被阻止的主机,我的IP也没有被阻止.

试图重新安装Ruby,重启机器,问题仍然发生.

有什么指针吗?

ela*_*ado 18

看起来这是Ruby解析DNS的一个问题.

添加require 'resolv-replace',现在它立即打开连接.

来源:https : //stackoverflow.com/a/27485369/116925 https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/597#issuecomment-40507119