Bab*_*ham 3 haskell types functor
我正在学习基本类型类,并functor为我的类型编写了自己的实现Test a(行为就像Maybe):
data Test a = Test a | Emp
class FC c a where
t :: (a -> b) -> c a -> c b
instance FC Test a where
t f (Test a) = Test (f a)
t f (Emp) = Emp
instance FC Maybe a where
t f (Just a) = Just (f a)
t f (Nothing) = Nothing
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有可能实现类似的东西:
instance FC c where
t f (c v) = c (f v)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
错误:
Parse error in pattern: c
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
换句话说,抽象出类型构造函数,替换为c和v,从而创建一个可以应用于具有上下文的任何值的通用实例?
如您所知,c a不是语法上有效的模式.但是,请将您的问题作为功能提案阅读:这将如何运作?并非每个Functor都有一个单元素构造函数可以根据您的模式进行映射.一些例子:
data Pair a = Pair a a -- more than one element
instance Functor Pair where
fmap f (Pair x y) = Pair (f x) (f y)
data Proxy a = Proxy -- no elements
instance Functor Proxy where
fmap f Proxy = Proxy
newtype Cont r a = Cont { runCont :: (a -> r) -> r } -- element appears in a double-negative position
instance Functor (Cont r) where
fmap f (Cont g) = Cont (g . (. f))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
无论如何,我认为"通用实例"的想法确实没有意义.该实例是您放置特定于类型的代码的位置.(它必须去某个地方!)
如果您想在编写Functor实例时花费较少的精力,可以使用GHC的DeriveFunctor扩展.
{-# LANGUAGE DeriveFunctor #-}
data Pair a = Pair a a deriving Functor
data Proxy a = Proxy deriving Functor
newtype Cont r a = Cont { runCont :: (a -> r) -> r } deriving Functor
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
232 次 |
| 最近记录: |