我有一个Ruby哈希:
ages = { "Bruce" => 32,
"Clark" => 28
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
假设我有另一个替换名称的哈希,是否有一种优雅的方式来重命名所有键,以便我最终得到:
ages = { "Bruce Wayne" => 32,
"Clark Kent" => 28
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Jör*_*tag 182
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
ages.map {|k, v| [mappings[k], v] }.to_h
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
bar*_*olo 49
我喜欢JörgWMittag的答案,但它可以改进.
如果要重命名当前Hash的键,而不是使用重命名的键创建新的Hash,则以下代码段完全相同:
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
ages.keys.each { |k| ages[ mappings[k] ] = ages.delete(k) if mappings[k] }
ages
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
还有一个优点是只重命名必要的密钥.
性能考虑:
根据Tin Man的回答,我的回答比JörgWMittag只用两把钥匙的Hash 快20%.对于具有许多键的Hashes,它可能会获得更高的性能,特别是如果只有几个键可以重命名.
ste*_*eel 10
each_with_objectRuby中也有未充分利用的方法:
ages = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
mappings = { "Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent" }
ages.each_with_object({}) { |(k, v), memo| memo[mappings[k]] = v }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
只是为了看看速度更快:
require 'fruity'
AGES = { "Bruce" => 32, "Clark" => 28 }
MAPPINGS = {"Bruce" => "Bruce Wayne", "Clark" => "Clark Kent"}
def jörg_w_mittag_test(ages, mappings)
Hash[ages.map {|k, v| [mappings[k], v] }]
end
require 'facets/hash/rekey'
def tyler_rick_test(ages, mappings)
ages.rekey(mappings)
end
def barbolo_test(ages, mappings)
ages.keys.each { |k| ages[ mappings[k] ] = ages.delete(k) if mappings[k] }
ages
end
class Hash
def tfr_rekey(h)
dup.tfr_rekey! h
end
def tfr_rekey!(h)
h.each { |k, newk| store(newk, delete(k)) if has_key? k }
self
end
end
def tfr_test(ages, mappings)
ages.tfr_rekey mappings
end
class Hash
def rename_keys(mapping)
result = {}
self.map do |k,v|
mapped_key = mapping[k] ? mapping[k] : k
result[mapped_key] = v.kind_of?(Hash) ? v.rename_keys(mapping) : v
result[mapped_key] = v.collect{ |obj| obj.rename_keys(mapping) if obj.kind_of?(Hash)} if v.kind_of?(Array)
end
result
end
end
def greg_test(ages, mappings)
ages.rename_keys(mappings)
end
compare do
jörg_w_mittag { jörg_w_mittag_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
tyler_rick { tyler_rick_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
barbolo { barbolo_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
greg { greg_test(AGES.dup, MAPPINGS.dup) }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
哪个输出:
Running each test 1024 times. Test will take about 1 second.
barbolo is faster than jörg_w_mittag by 19.999999999999996% ± 10.0%
jörg_w_mittag is faster than greg by 10.000000000000009% ± 10.0%
greg is faster than tyler_rick by 30.000000000000004% ± 10.0%
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
注意: barbell的解决方案使用if mappings[k],如果mappings[k]结果为零值,将导致生成的哈希错误.
我修补了类来处理嵌套的哈希和数组:
# Netsted Hash:
#
# str_hash = {
# "a" => "a val",
# "b" => "b val",
# "c" => {
# "c1" => "c1 val",
# "c2" => "c2 val"
# },
# "d" => "d val",
# }
#
# mappings = {
# "a" => "apple",
# "b" => "boss",
# "c" => "cat",
# "c1" => "cat 1"
# }
# => {"apple"=>"a val", "boss"=>"b val", "cat"=>{"cat 1"=>"c1 val", "c2"=>"c2 val"}, "d"=>"d val"}
#
class Hash
def rename_keys(mapping)
result = {}
self.map do |k,v|
mapped_key = mapping[k] ? mapping[k] : k
result[mapped_key] = v.kind_of?(Hash) ? v.rename_keys(mapping) : v
result[mapped_key] = v.collect{ |obj| obj.rename_keys(mapping) if obj.kind_of?(Hash)} if v.kind_of?(Array)
end
result
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)