如何在Angular 2中为特定路由实现RouteReuseStrategy shouldDetach

And*_*ind 85 javascript typescript angular-ui-router angular

我有一个Angular 2模块,我在其中实现了路由,并希望在导航时存储状态.用户应该能够:1.使用搜索公式搜索文档2.导航到其中一个结果3.导航回searchresult - 无需与服务器通信

这可能包括RouteReuseStrategy.问题是:如何实现不应存储文档?

那么应该存储路径路径"文档"的状态,并且不应存储路径路径"documents /:id"'状态?

Cor*_*fon 172

嘿安德斯,好问题!

我有几乎和你一样的用例,并希望做同样的事情!用户搜索>获取结果>用户导航到结果>用户导航回来> BOOM 快速返回结果,但您不希望存储用户导航到的特定结果.

TL;博士

您需要有一个实现RouteReuseStrategy并提供策略的类ngModule.如果要在存储路径时进行修改,请修改该shouldDetach功能.返回时true,Angular会存储路径.如果要在附加路径时进行修改,请修改该shouldAttach功能.当shouldAttach返回true,角将使用存储的路径来代替请求路线.这是一个让你玩的Plunker.

关于RouteReuseStrategy

通过提出这个问题,你已经了解到RouteReuseStrategy允许你告诉Angular2 不要销毁一个组件,但实际上要保存它以便以后重新渲染.这很酷,因为它允许:

  • 减少服务器调用
  • 提高速度
  • 并且默认情况下,组件呈现的状态与剩余的状态相同

如果您希望暂时离开页面,即使用户已经输入了大量文本,那么最后一个也很重要.由于表单数量过多,企业应用程序会喜欢这个功能!

这就是我想出来解决问题的方法.正如您所说,您需要RouteReuseStrategy在版本3.4.1及更高版本中使用@ angular/router提供的功能.

去做

首先确保您的项目具有@ angular/router版本3.4.1或更高版本.

接下来,创建一个文件,它将容纳您实现的类RouteReuseStrategy.我打电话给我reuse-strategy.ts,并将其放在/app文件夹中以便妥善保管.现在,这个类看起来像:

import { RouteReuseStrategy } from '@angular/router';

export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

(不要担心你的TypeScript错误,我们即将解决所有问题)

通过为您的课程提供课程来完成基础工作app.module.请注意,您还没有写过CustomReuseStrategy,但是应该继续写import下来reuse-strategy.ts.也import { RouteReuseStrategy } from '@angular/router';

@NgModule({
    [...],
    providers: [
        {provide: RouteReuseStrategy, useClass: CustomReuseStrategy}
    ]
)}
export class AppModule {
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

最后一部分是编写类,它将控制路由是否分离,存储,检索和重新连接.在我们进行旧的复制/粘贴之前,我将在这里对机制做一个简短的解释,因为我理解它们.为我描述的方法引用下面的代码,当然,代码中有大量的文档.

  1. 当你导航,shouldReuseRoute开火.这个对我来说有点奇怪,但是如果它返回true,那么它实际上会重用你当前所使用的路线并且没有其他方法被触发.如果用户正在导航,我只返回false.
  2. 如果shouldReuseRoute退货false,shouldDetach火灾.shouldDetach确定是否要存储路径,并返回boolean指示.这是您应该决定存储/不存储路径的地方,我将通过检查存储的路径数组来执行此操作,route.routeConfig.path如果path数组中不存在则返回false .
  3. 如果shouldDetach返回true,store则触发,这是您存储关于路线的任何信息的机会.无论你做什么,你都需要存储,DetachedRouteHandle因为这是Angular稍后用来识别你存储的组件的东西.下面,我将the DetachedRouteHandle和the 存储ActivatedRouteSnapshot到我的班级的本地变量中.

所以,我们已经看到了存储的逻辑,但是导航组件呢?Angular如何决定拦截您的导航并将存储的导航放在其位置?

  1. 再次,在shouldReuseRoute返回后false,shouldAttach运行,这是你有机会弄清楚是否要重新生成或使用内存中的组件.如果您想重复使用已存储的组件,请返回true并且您正在路上!
  2. 现在,角度会问你,"你希望我们使用的组件?",您将通过返回该组件的指示DetachedRouteHandleretrieve.

这几乎是你需要的所有逻辑!在reuse-strategy.ts下面的代码中,我还给你留下了一个可以比较两个对象的漂亮函数.我用它来比较未来的路线route.paramsroute.queryParams存储的路线.如果这些都匹配,我想使用存储的组件而不是生成一个新组件.但是你如何做到这一点取决于你!

重用strategy.ts

/**
 * reuse-strategy.ts
 * by corbfon 1/6/17
 */

import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouteReuseStrategy, DetachedRouteHandle } from '@angular/router';

/** Interface for object which can store both: 
 * An ActivatedRouteSnapshot, which is useful for determining whether or not you should attach a route (see this.shouldAttach)
 * A DetachedRouteHandle, which is offered up by this.retrieve, in the case that you do want to attach the stored route
 */
interface RouteStorageObject {
    snapshot: ActivatedRouteSnapshot;
    handle: DetachedRouteHandle;
}

export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {

    /** 
     * Object which will store RouteStorageObjects indexed by keys
     * The keys will all be a path (as in route.routeConfig.path)
     * This allows us to see if we've got a route stored for the requested path
     */
    storedRoutes: { [key: string]: RouteStorageObject } = {};

    /** 
     * Decides when the route should be stored
     * If the route should be stored, I believe the boolean is indicating to a controller whether or not to fire this.store
     * _When_ it is called though does not particularly matter, just know that this determines whether or not we store the route
     * An idea of what to do here: check the route.routeConfig.path to see if it is a path you would like to store
     * @param route This is, at least as I understand it, the route that the user is currently on, and we would like to know if we want to store it
     * @returns boolean indicating that we want to (true) or do not want to (false) store that route
     */
    shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
        let detach: boolean = true;
        console.log("detaching", route, "return: ", detach);
        return detach;
    }

    /**
     * Constructs object of type `RouteStorageObject` to store, and then stores it for later attachment
     * @param route This is stored for later comparison to requested routes, see `this.shouldAttach`
     * @param handle Later to be retrieved by this.retrieve, and offered up to whatever controller is using this class
     */
    store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
        let storedRoute: RouteStorageObject = {
            snapshot: route,
            handle: handle
        };

        console.log( "store:", storedRoute, "into: ", this.storedRoutes );
        // routes are stored by path - the key is the path name, and the handle is stored under it so that you can only ever have one object stored for a single path
        this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path] = storedRoute;
    }

    /**
     * Determines whether or not there is a stored route and, if there is, whether or not it should be rendered in place of requested route
     * @param route The route the user requested
     * @returns boolean indicating whether or not to render the stored route
     */
    shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {

        // this will be true if the route has been stored before
        let canAttach: boolean = !!route.routeConfig && !!this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path];

        // this decides whether the route already stored should be rendered in place of the requested route, and is the return value
        // at this point we already know that the paths match because the storedResults key is the route.routeConfig.path
        // so, if the route.params and route.queryParams also match, then we should reuse the component
        if (canAttach) {
            let willAttach: boolean = true;
            console.log("param comparison:");
            console.log(this.compareObjects(route.params, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.params));
            console.log("query param comparison");
            console.log(this.compareObjects(route.queryParams, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.queryParams));

            let paramsMatch: boolean = this.compareObjects(route.params, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.params);
            let queryParamsMatch: boolean = this.compareObjects(route.queryParams, this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot.queryParams);

            console.log("deciding to attach...", route, "does it match?", this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].snapshot, "return: ", paramsMatch && queryParamsMatch);
            return paramsMatch && queryParamsMatch;
        } else {
            return false;
        }
    }

    /** 
     * Finds the locally stored instance of the requested route, if it exists, and returns it
     * @param route New route the user has requested
     * @returns DetachedRouteHandle object which can be used to render the component
     */
    retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {

        // return null if the path does not have a routerConfig OR if there is no stored route for that routerConfig
        if (!route.routeConfig || !this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path]) return null;
        console.log("retrieving", "return: ", this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path]);

        /** returns handle when the route.routeConfig.path is already stored */
        return this.storedRoutes[route.routeConfig.path].handle;
    }

    /** 
     * Determines whether or not the current route should be reused
     * @param future The route the user is going to, as triggered by the router
     * @param curr The route the user is currently on
     * @returns boolean basically indicating true if the user intends to leave the current route
     */
    shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
        console.log("deciding to reuse", "future", future.routeConfig, "current", curr.routeConfig, "return: ", future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig);
        return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
    }

    /** 
     * This nasty bugger finds out whether the objects are _traditionally_ equal to each other, like you might assume someone else would have put this function in vanilla JS already
     * One thing to note is that it uses coercive comparison (==) on properties which both objects have, not strict comparison (===)
     * Another important note is that the method only tells you if `compare` has all equal parameters to `base`, not the other way around
     * @param base The base object which you would like to compare another object to
     * @param compare The object to compare to base
     * @returns boolean indicating whether or not the objects have all the same properties and those properties are ==
     */
    private compareObjects(base: any, compare: any): boolean {

        // loop through all properties in base object
        for (let baseProperty in base) {

            // determine if comparrison object has that property, if not: return false
            if (compare.hasOwnProperty(baseProperty)) {
                switch(typeof base[baseProperty]) {
                    // if one is object and other is not: return false
                    // if they are both objects, recursively call this comparison function
                    case 'object':
                        if ( typeof compare[baseProperty] !== 'object' || !this.compareObjects(base[baseProperty], compare[baseProperty]) ) { return false; } break;
                    // if one is function and other is not: return false
                    // if both are functions, compare function.toString() results
                    case 'function':
                        if ( typeof compare[baseProperty] !== 'function' || base[baseProperty].toString() !== compare[baseProperty].toString() ) { return false; } break;
                    // otherwise, see if they are equal using coercive comparison
                    default:
                        if ( base[baseProperty] != compare[baseProperty] ) { return false; }
                }
            } else {
                return false;
            }
        }

        // returns true only after false HAS NOT BEEN returned through all loops
        return true;
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

行为

此实现存储用户在路由器上访问的每个唯一路由一次.这将继续在站点上的整个用户会话中添加存储在内存中的组件.如果您想限制存储的路线,那么这个shouldDetach方法就是方法.它控制您保存的路线.

假设您的用户从主页搜索某些内容,然后将其导航到search/:term可能显示的路径www.yourwebsite.com/search/thingsearchedfor.搜索页面包含一堆搜索结果.你想存放这条路线,以防他们想回来!现在,他们点击一个搜索结果,并获得导航到view/:resultId,你希望存储,看到他们很可能会出现一次.有了上面的实现,我只想改变shouldDetach方法!这是它的样子:

首先,让我们创建一个我们想要存储的路径数组.

private acceptedRoutes: string[] = ["search/:term"];
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

现在,在shouldDetach我们可以检查route.routeConfig.path我们的阵列.

shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    // check to see if the route's path is in our acceptedRoutes array
    if (this.acceptedRoutes.indexOf(route.routeConfig.path) > -1) {
        console.log("detaching", route);
        return true;
    } else {
        return false; // will be "view/:resultId" when user navigates to result
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

因为Angular 只存储路由的一个实例,所以这个存储将是轻量级的,我们只会存储位于search/:term而不是所有其他组件的组件!

其他链接

虽然目前还没有太多的文档,但这里有几个链接到存在的内容:

Angular Docs:https://angular.io/docs/ts/latest/api/router/index/RouteReuseStrategy-class.html

介绍文章:https://www.softwarearchitekt.at/post/2016/12/02/sticky-routes-in-angular-2-3-with-routereusestrategy.aspx

  • @shaahin我添加了一个示例,这是我当前实现中包含的确切代码! (2认同)
  • 有没有办法让它在重新激活存储的路线时重新运行输入动画? (2认同)
  • ReuseRouteStrategy会将你的组件交还给路由器,因此它将处于它所处的任何状态.如果你想要将组件_react_连接到附件,你可以使用提供`Observable`的服务. .组件应该在`ngOnInit`生命周期钩子中订阅`Observable`.然后,您将能够从"ReuseRouteStrategy"告诉组件它刚刚被附加,组件可以根据需要修改其状态. (2认同)

Chr*_*gen 33

不要被接受的答案吓倒,这非常简单.这里是您需要的快速答案.我建议至少阅读接受的答案,因为它充满了非常详细的信息.

此解决方案不会像接受的答案那样进行任何参数比较,但它可以很好地存储一组路径.

app.module.ts进口:

import { RouteReuseStrategy } from '@angular/router';
import { CustomReuseStrategy, Routing } from './shared/routing';

@NgModule({
//...
providers: [
    { provide: RouteReuseStrategy, useClass: CustomReuseStrategy },
  ]})
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

共享/ routing.ts:

export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {
 routesToCache: string[] = ["dashboard"];
 storedRouteHandles = new Map<string, DetachedRouteHandle>();

 // Decides if the route should be stored
 shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return this.routesToCache.indexOf(route.routeConfig.path) > -1;
 }

 //Store the information for the route we're destructing
 store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
    this.storedRouteHandles.set(route.routeConfig.path, handle);
 }

//Return true if we have a stored route object for the next route
 shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return this.storedRouteHandles.has(route.routeConfig.path);
 }

 //If we returned true in shouldAttach(), now return the actual route data for restoration
 retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {
    return this.storedRouteHandles.get(route.routeConfig.path);
 }

 //Reuse the route if we're going to and from the same route
 shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
 }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • 这也适用于延迟加载的路由吗? (2认同)
  • routeConfig 为 null,对于不同的路由,因此 shouldReuseRoute 将始终返回 true,这不是所需的行为 (2认同)

McG*_*gen 21

另一个更有效、更完整和可重用的实现。这个支持延迟加载模块@U?ur Dinç 并集成@Davor 路由数据标志。最好的改进是基于页面绝对路径自动生成(几乎)唯一标识符。这样您就不必在每个页面上自己定义它。

标记要缓存设置的任何页面reuseRoute: true。将在shouldDetach方法中使用。

{
  path: '',
  component: MyPageComponent,
  data: { reuseRoute: true },
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这是最简单的策略实现,无需比较查询参数。

import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouteReuseStrategy, DetachedRouteHandle, UrlSegment } from '@angular/router'

export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {

  storedHandles: { [key: string]: DetachedRouteHandle } = {};

  shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return route.data.reuseRoute || false;
  }

  store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
    const id = this.createIdentifier(route);
    if (route.data.reuseRoute) {
      this.storedHandles[id] = handle;
    }
  }

  shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    const id = this.createIdentifier(route);
    const handle = this.storedHandles[id];
    const canAttach = !!route.routeConfig && !!handle;
    return canAttach;
  }

  retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {
    const id = this.createIdentifier(route);
    if (!route.routeConfig || !this.storedHandles[id]) return null;
    return this.storedHandles[id];
  }

  shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
  }

  private createIdentifier(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot) {
    // Build the complete path from the root to the input route
    const segments: UrlSegment[][] = route.pathFromRoot.map(r => r.url);
    const subpaths = ([] as UrlSegment[]).concat(...segments).map(segment => segment.path);
    // Result: ${route_depth}-${path}
    return segments.length + '-' + subpaths.join('/');
  }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这个也比较了查询参数。compareObjects比@Corbfon 版本有一点改进:循环访问基础和比较对象的属性。请记住,您可以使用外部且更可靠的实现,例如 lodashisEqual方法。

import { ActivatedRouteSnapshot, RouteReuseStrategy, DetachedRouteHandle, UrlSegment } from '@angular/router'

interface RouteStorageObject {
  snapshot: ActivatedRouteSnapshot;
  handle: DetachedRouteHandle;
}

export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {

  storedRoutes: { [key: string]: RouteStorageObject } = {};

  shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return route.data.reuseRoute || false;
  }

  store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
    const id = this.createIdentifier(route);
    if (route.data.reuseRoute && id.length > 0) {
      this.storedRoutes[id] = { handle, snapshot: route };
    }
  }

  shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    const id = this.createIdentifier(route);
    const storedObject = this.storedRoutes[id];
    const canAttach = !!route.routeConfig && !!storedObject;
    if (!canAttach) return false;

    const paramsMatch = this.compareObjects(route.params, storedObject.snapshot.params);
    const queryParamsMatch = this.compareObjects(route.queryParams, storedObject.snapshot.queryParams);

    console.log('deciding to attach...', route, 'does it match?');
    console.log('param comparison:', paramsMatch);
    console.log('query param comparison', queryParamsMatch);
    console.log(storedObject.snapshot, 'return: ', paramsMatch && queryParamsMatch);

    return paramsMatch && queryParamsMatch;
  }

  retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {
    const id = this.createIdentifier(route);
    if (!route.routeConfig || !this.storedRoutes[id]) return null;
    return this.storedRoutes[id].handle;
  }

  shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
  }

  private createIdentifier(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot) {
    // Build the complete path from the root to the input route
    const segments: UrlSegment[][] = route.pathFromRoot.map(r => r.url);
    const subpaths = ([] as UrlSegment[]).concat(...segments).map(segment => segment.path);
    // Result: ${route_depth}-${path}
    return segments.length + '-' + subpaths.join('/');
  }

  private compareObjects(base: any, compare: any): boolean {

    // loop through all properties
    for (const baseProperty in { ...base, ...compare }) {

      // determine if comparrison object has that property, if not: return false
      if (compare.hasOwnProperty(baseProperty)) {
        switch (typeof base[baseProperty]) {
          // if one is object and other is not: return false
          // if they are both objects, recursively call this comparison function
          case 'object':
            if (typeof compare[baseProperty] !== 'object' || !this.compareObjects(base[baseProperty], compare[baseProperty])) {
              return false;
            }
            break;
          // if one is function and other is not: return false
          // if both are functions, compare function.toString() results
          case 'function':
            if (typeof compare[baseProperty] !== 'function' || base[baseProperty].toString() !== compare[baseProperty].toString()) {
              return false;
            }
            break;
          // otherwise, see if they are equal using coercive comparison
          default:
            // tslint:disable-next-line triple-equals
            if (base[baseProperty] != compare[baseProperty]) {
              return false;
            }
        }
      } else {
        return false;
      }
    }

    // returns true only after false HAS NOT BEEN returned through all loops
    return true;
  }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

如果您有生成唯一键的最佳方法,请评论我的答案,我将更新代码。

感谢所有分享他们解决方案的人。

  • 这应该是公认的答案。上面提供的许多解决方案无法支持具有相同子 URL 的多个页面。因为他们正在比较activatedRoute URL,这不是完整路径。 (4认同)

Hie*_*ran 21

角度 13(2022 年 2 月 28 日版本)

阅读大量指南和建议后。我可以解释一下:

首先,你必须了解什么是未来和当前。

例如:当您从 导航localhost/a到时localhost/b,现在您位于 b 中。

案例1:你想要从/a -> /b

  • shouldReuseRoute:false因为future !== current
  • shouldDetach:true因为我们detach将来会将任何东西保存()store并等待重用(attach)。
  • shouldRetrieve:true || fase检查handler是否是我们attach保存的未来组件以供重用。如果没有,我们什么也不做。(在这种情况下是没有)

情况2:你想要从/b?id=1 -> /b?id=2

  • 应该重用路由:true因为future === current
  • 应该分离:跳过
  • 应该检索:跳过

情况 3:你想从/b -> /a

  • shouldReuseRoute:false因为future !== current
  • shouldDetach:true因为我们detach将来会将任何东西保存()store并等待重用(attach)。
  • shouldRetrieve:true || fase检查handler是否是我们attach保存的未来组件以供重用。如果没有,我们什么都不做。(在本例中是肯定的)

好的。来自/sf/answers/3205208891/的更简单的视觉效果

navigate to a
shouldReuseRoute->return true->do nothing

a->b
shouldReuseRoute()->return false->shouldDetach()->return true->store a

then b->a
shouldReuseRoute()->return false->shouldDetach()->return true->store b->retrieve() return a ->attach() a.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

然后来自/sf/answers/4830334281/的更多视觉效果 在此输入图像描述

并最终从角度团队获得正确的代码:https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/44383

export class CustomRouteReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy { 
    private handlers: Map<Route, DetachedRouteHandle> = new Map();

    constructor() {}

    public shouldDetach(_route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
        return true;
    }

    public store(
        route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot,
        handle: DetachedRouteHandle
    ): void {
        if (!route.routeConfig) return;
        this.handlers.set(route.routeConfig, handle);
    }

    public shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
        return !!route.routeConfig && !!this.handlers.get(route.routeConfig);
    }

    public retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle|null {
        if (!route.routeConfig || !this.handlers.has(route.routeConfig)) return null;
        return this.handlers.get(route.routeConfig)!;
    }

    public shouldReuseRoute(
        future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot,
        curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot
    ): boolean {
        return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


Uğu*_*inç 10

要在延迟加载的模块中使用Chris Fremgen的策略,请将CustomReuseStrategy类修改为以下内容:

import {ActivatedRouteSnapshot, DetachedRouteHandle, RouteReuseStrategy} from '@angular/router';

export class CustomReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {
  routesToCache: string[] = ["company"];
  storedRouteHandles = new Map<string, DetachedRouteHandle>();

  // Decides if the route should be stored
  shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
     return this.routesToCache.indexOf(route.data["key"]) > -1;
  }

  //Store the information for the route we're destructing
  store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
     this.storedRouteHandles.set(route.data["key"], handle);
  }

  //Return true if we have a stored route object for the next route
  shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
     return this.storedRouteHandles.has(route.data["key"]);
  }

  //If we returned true in shouldAttach(), now return the actual route data for restoration
  retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle {
     return this.storedRouteHandles.get(route.data["key"]);
  }

  //Reuse the route if we're going to and from the same route
  shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
     return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
  }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

最后,在功能模块的路由文件中,定义您的密钥:

{ path: '', component: CompanyComponent, children: [
    {path: '', component: CompanyListComponent, data: {key: "company"}},
    {path: ':companyID', component: CompanyDetailComponent},
]}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

更多信息在这里.


hov*_*ado 9

所有提到的解决方案在我们的案例中都有些不足。我们有较小的企业应用程序:

  1. 简介页
  2. 登录页面
  3. 应用程序(登录后)

我们的要求:

  1. 延迟加载模块
  2. 多层次路线
  3. 将所有路由器/组件状态存储在应用程序部分的内存中
  4. 在特定路线上使用默认角度重用策略的选项
  5. 注销时销毁内存中存储的所有组件

我们路线的简化示例:

const routes: Routes = [{
    path: '',
    children: [
        {
            path: '',
            canActivate: [CanActivate],
            loadChildren: () => import('./modules/dashboard/dashboard.module').then(module => module.DashboardModule)
        },
        {
            path: 'companies',
            canActivate: [CanActivate],
            loadChildren: () => import('./modules/company/company.module').then(module => module.CompanyModule)
        }
    ]
},
{
    path: 'login',
    loadChildren: () => import('./modules/login/login.module').then(module => module.LoginModule),
    data: {
        defaultReuseStrategy: true, // Ignore our custom route strategy
        resetReuseStrategy: true // Logout redirect user to login and all data are destroyed
    }
}];
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

复用策略:

export class AppReuseStrategy implements RouteReuseStrategy {

private handles: Map<string, DetachedRouteHandle> = new Map();

// Asks if a snapshot from the current routing can be used for the future routing.
public shouldReuseRoute(future: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, curr: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return future.routeConfig === curr.routeConfig;
}

// Asks if a snapshot for the current route already has been stored.
// Return true, if handles map contains the right snapshot and the router should re-attach this snapshot to the routing.
public shouldAttach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    if (this.shouldResetReuseStrategy(route)) {
        this.deactivateAllHandles();
        return false;
    }

    if (this.shouldIgnoreReuseStrategy(route)) {
        return false;
    }

    return this.handles.has(this.getKey(route));
}

// Load the snapshot from storage. It's only called, if the shouldAttach-method returned true.
public retrieve(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): DetachedRouteHandle | null {
    return this.handles.get(this.getKey(route)) || null;
}

// Asks if the snapshot should be detached from the router.
// That means that the router will no longer handle this snapshot after it has been stored by calling the store-method.
public shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return !this.shouldIgnoreReuseStrategy(route);
}

// After the router has asked by using the shouldDetach-method and it returned true, the store-method is called (not immediately but some time later).
public store(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, handle: DetachedRouteHandle | null): void {
    if (!handle) {
        return;
    }

    this.handles.set(this.getKey(route), handle);
}

private shouldResetReuseStrategy(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    let snapshot: ActivatedRouteSnapshot = route;

    while (snapshot.children && snapshot.children.length) {
        snapshot = snapshot.children[0];
    }

    return snapshot.data && snapshot.data.resetReuseStrategy;
}

private shouldIgnoreReuseStrategy(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
    return route.data && route.data.defaultReuseStrategy;
}

private deactivateAllHandles(): void {
    this.handles.forEach((handle: DetachedRouteHandle) => this.destroyComponent(handle));
    this.handles.clear();
}

private destroyComponent(handle: DetachedRouteHandle): void {
    const componentRef: ComponentRef<any> = handle['componentRef'];

    if (componentRef) {
        componentRef.destroy();
    }
}

private getKey(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): string {
    return route.pathFromRoot
        .map((snapshot: ActivatedRouteSnapshot) => snapshot.routeConfig ? snapshot.routeConfig.path : '')
        .filter((path: string) => path.length > 0)
        .join('');
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


Dav*_*vor 8

除了接受的答案(由Corbfon提出)和Chris Fremgen简短而直接的解释之外,我还想添加一种更灵活的方式来处理应该使用重用策略的路由。

这两个答案都将要缓存的路由存储在数组中,然后检查当前路由路径是否在数组中。此检查是在shouldDetach方法中完成的。

我发现这种方法不灵活,因为如果我们想更改路线的名称,我们需要记住还要在我们的CustomReuseStrategy班级中更改路线的名称。我们可能会忘记更改它,或者我们团队中的其他开发人员可能会决定更改路线名称,甚至不知道的存在RouteReuseStrategy

无需将要缓存的路由存储在数组中,我们可以直接在RouterModuleusing data对象中对其进行标记。这样,即使我们更改了路由名称,重用策略仍将适用。

{
  path: 'route-name-i-can-change',
  component: TestComponent,
  data: {
    reuseRoute: true
  }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

然后在shouldDetach方法中我们利用了这一点。

shouldDetach(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot): boolean {
  return route.data.reuseRoute === true;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • 好的解决方案。这确实应该通过像您应用的那样的简单标志纳入标准角度路由重用策略中。 (2认同)