Pau*_*ce. 183
这是一个纯Bash版本,不需要任何外部实用程序:
#!/bin/bash
vercomp () {
if [[ $1 == $2 ]]
then
return 0
fi
local IFS=.
local i ver1=($1) ver2=($2)
# fill empty fields in ver1 with zeros
for ((i=${#ver1[@]}; i<${#ver2[@]}; i++))
do
ver1[i]=0
done
for ((i=0; i<${#ver1[@]}; i++))
do
if [[ -z ${ver2[i]} ]]
then
# fill empty fields in ver2 with zeros
ver2[i]=0
fi
if ((10#${ver1[i]} > 10#${ver2[i]}))
then
return 1
fi
if ((10#${ver1[i]} < 10#${ver2[i]}))
then
return 2
fi
done
return 0
}
testvercomp () {
vercomp $1 $2
case $? in
0) op='=';;
1) op='>';;
2) op='<';;
esac
if [[ $op != $3 ]]
then
echo "FAIL: Expected '$3', Actual '$op', Arg1 '$1', Arg2 '$2'"
else
echo "Pass: '$1 $op $2'"
fi
}
# Run tests
# argument table format:
# testarg1 testarg2 expected_relationship
echo "The following tests should pass"
while read -r test
do
testvercomp $test
done << EOF
1 1 =
2.1 2.2 <
3.0.4.10 3.0.4.2 >
4.08 4.08.01 <
3.2.1.9.8144 3.2 >
3.2 3.2.1.9.8144 <
1.2 2.1 <
2.1 1.2 >
5.6.7 5.6.7 =
1.01.1 1.1.1 =
1.1.1 1.01.1 =
1 1.0 =
1.0 1 =
1.0.2.0 1.0.2 =
1..0 1.0 =
1.0 1..0 =
EOF
echo "The following test should fail (test the tester)"
testvercomp 1 1 '>'
运行测试:
$ . ./vercomp
The following tests should pass
Pass: '1 = 1'
Pass: '2.1 < 2.2'
Pass: '3.0.4.10 > 3.0.4.2'
Pass: '4.08 < 4.08.01'
Pass: '3.2.1.9.8144 > 3.2'
Pass: '3.2 < 3.2.1.9.8144'
Pass: '1.2 < 2.1'
Pass: '2.1 > 1.2'
Pass: '5.6.7 = 5.6.7'
Pass: '1.01.1 = 1.1.1'
Pass: '1.1.1 = 1.01.1'
Pass: '1 = 1.0'
Pass: '1.0 = 1'
Pass: '1.0.2.0 = 1.0.2'
Pass: '1..0 = 1.0'
Pass: '1.0 = 1..0'
The following test should fail (test the tester)
FAIL: Expected '>', Actual '=', Arg1 '1', Arg2 '1'
kan*_*aka 126
如果你有coreutils-7(在Ubuntu Karmic而不是Jaunty),那么你的sort命令应该有一个-V选项(版本排序),你可以使用它来进行比较:
verlte() {
[ "$1" = "`echo -e "$1\n$2" | sort -V | head -n1`" ]
}
verlt() {
[ "$1" = "$2" ] && return 1 || verlte $1 $2
}
verlte 2.5.7 2.5.6 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # no
verlt 2.4.10 2.4.9 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # no
verlt 2.4.8 2.4.10 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # yes
verlte 2.5.6 2.5.6 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # yes
verlt 2.5.6 2.5.6 && echo "yes" || echo "no" # no
Hel*_*hne 55
可能没有普遍正确的方法来实现这一目标.如果您正在尝试比较Debian软件包系统中的版本,请尝试dpkg --compare-versions <first> <relation> <second>.
mou*_*iel 42
GNU sort有一个选项:
printf '2.4.5\n2.8\n2.4.5.1\n' | sort -V
得到:
2.4.5
2.4.5.1
2.8
joy*_*nes 32
好吧,如果你知道你可以使用的字段数-kn,n并获得一个超级简单的解决方案
echo '2.4.5
2.8
2.4.5.1
2.10.2' | sort -t '.' -k 1,1 -k 2,2 -k 3,3 -k 4,4 -g
2.4.5
2.4.5.1
2.8
2.10.2
fak*_*ake 20
这适用于版本中最多4个字段.
$ function ver { printf "%03d%03d%03d%03d" $(echo "$1" | tr '.' ' '); }
$ [ $(ver 10.9) -lt $(ver 10.10) ] && echo hello
hello
yai*_*chu 13
function version { echo "$@" | awk -F. '{ printf("%d%03d%03d%03d\n", $1,$2,$3,$4); }'; }
用作这样的:
if [ $(version $VAR) -ge $(version "6.2.0") ]; then
echo "Version is up to date"
fi
(来自https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/123408/11374)
您可以递归拆分.并进行比较,如下面的算法所示,取自此处.如果版本相同则返回10,如果版本1大于版本2则返回11,否则返回9.
#!/bin/bash
do_version_check() {
[ "$1" == "$2" ] && return 10
ver1front=`echo $1 | cut -d "." -f -1`
ver1back=`echo $1 | cut -d "." -f 2-`
ver2front=`echo $2 | cut -d "." -f -1`
ver2back=`echo $2 | cut -d "." -f 2-`
if [ "$ver1front" != "$1" ] || [ "$ver2front" != "$2" ]; then
[ "$ver1front" -gt "$ver2front" ] && return 11
[ "$ver1front" -lt "$ver2front" ] && return 9
[ "$ver1front" == "$1" ] || [ -z "$ver1back" ] && ver1back=0
[ "$ver2front" == "$2" ] || [ -z "$ver2back" ] && ver2back=0
do_version_check "$ver1back" "$ver2back"
return $?
else
[ "$1" -gt "$2" ] && return 11 || return 9
fi
}
do_version_check "$1" "$2"
如果只是想知道一个版本是否低于另一个版本，我会检查是否sort --version-sort更改了版本字符串的顺序：
string="$1
$2"
[ "$string" == "$(sort --version-sort <<< "$string")" ]
$ for OVFTOOL_VERSION in "4.2.0" "4.2.1" "5.2.0" "3.2.0" "4.1.9" "4.0.1" "4.3.0" "4.5.0" "4.2.1" "30.1.0" "4" "5" "4.1" "4.3"
> do
> if [ $(echo "$OVFTOOL_VERSION 4.2.0" | tr " " "\n" | sort --version-sort | head -n 1) = 4.2.0 ]; then
> echo "$OVFTOOL_VERSION is >= 4.2.0";
> else
> echo "$OVFTOOL_VERSION is < 4.2.0";
> fi
> done
4.2.0 is >= 4.2.0
4.2.1 is >= 4.2.0
5.2.0 is >= 4.2.0
3.2.0 is < 4.2.0
4.1.9 is < 4.2.0
4.0.1 is < 4.2.0
4.3.0 is >= 4.2.0
4.5.0 is >= 4.2.0
4.2.1 is >= 4.2.0
30.1.0 is >= 4.2.0
4 is < 4.2.0
5 is >= 4.2.0
4.1 is < 4.2.0
4.3 is >= 4.2.0
V- 纯 bash 解决方案，不需要外部实用程序。= == != < <= >和>=（字典）。1.5a < 1.5b1.6 > 1.5bif V 1.5 '<' 1.6; then ...。<>
# Sample output
# Note: ++ (true) and __ (false) mean that V works correctly.
++ 3.6 '>' 3.5b
__ 2.5.7 '<=' 2.5.6
++ 2.4.10 '<' 2.5.9
__ 3.0002 '>' 3.0003.3
++ 4.0-RC2 '>' 4.0-RC1
<>
function V() # $1-a $2-op $3-$b
# Compare a and b as version strings. Rules:
# R1: a and b : dot-separated sequence of items. Items are numeric. The last item can optionally end with letters, i.e., 2.5 or 2.5a.
# R2: Zeros are automatically inserted to compare the same number of items, i.e., 1.0 < 1.0.1 means 1.0.0 < 1.0.1 => yes.
# R3: op can be '=' '==' '!=' '<' '<=' '>' '>=' (lexicographic).
# R4: Unrestricted number of digits of any item, i.e., 3.0003 > 3.0000004.
# R5: Unrestricted number of items.
{
local a=$1 op=$2 b=$3 al=${1##*.} bl=${3##*.}
while [[ $al =~ ^[[:digit:]] ]]; do al=${al:1}; done
while [[ $bl =~ ^[[:digit:]] ]]; do bl=${bl:1}; done
local ai=${a%$al} bi=${b%$bl}
local ap=${ai//[[:digit:]]} bp=${bi//[[:digit:]]}
ap=${ap//./.0} bp=${bp//./.0}
local w=1 fmt=$a.$b x IFS=.
for x in $fmt; do [ ${#x} -gt $w ] && w=${#x}; done
fmt=${*//[^.]}; fmt=${fmt//./%${w}s}
printf -v a $fmt $ai$bp; printf -v a "%s-%${w}s" $a $al
printf -v b $fmt $bi$ap; printf -v b "%s-%${w}s" $b $bl
case $op in
'<='|'>=' ) [ "$a" ${op:0:1} "$b" ] || [ "$a" = "$b" ] ;;
* ) [ "$a" $op "$b" ] ;;
esac
}
第 1 行：定义局部变量：
a, op, b- 比较操作数和运算符，即“3.6”>“3.5a”。al，bl-信尾巴a和b，初始化为尾项，即，“6”和“5A”。第 2、3 行：从尾部项中左修剪数字，因此只剩下字母（如果有），即“”和“a”。
第 4 行：从右侧修剪字母a并b仅保留数字项序列作为局部变量ai和bi，即“3.6”和“3.5”。值得注意的例子："4.01-RC2" > "4.01-RC1" 产生 ai="4.01" al="-RC2" 和 bi="4.01" bl="-RC1"。
第 6 行：定义局部变量：
ap, bp-ai和 的右填充为零bi。通过只保留项目间点，其中数量等于元件的数量开始a和b分别。第 7 行：然后在每个点后附加“0”以制作填充掩码。
第 9 行：局部变量：
w - 项目宽度fmt - printf 格式字符串，待计算x - 暂时的IFS=.bash 在 '.' 处拆分变量值。第 10 行：计算w最大项目宽度，用于对齐项目以进行字典比较。在我们的例子中 w=2。
第 11 行：通过替换$a.$bwith 的每个字符来创建 printf 对齐格式%${w}s，即“3.6”>“3.5a”产生“%2s%2s%2s%2s”。
第 12 行：“printf -v a”设置变量的值a。这相当于a=sprintf(...)在许多编程语言中。注意这里，受 IFS= 的影响。要printf拆分为单个项目的参数。
的第一printf项a用空格左填充，同时附加足够的“0”项bp以确保结果字符串a可以与类似格式的b.
请注意，我们添加bp-不ap给ai，因为ap并bp可能有两种不同长度，所以这个结果a并b具有相等的长度。
对于第二个，printf我们将字母部分附加al到a足够的填充中以进行有意义的比较。现在a已准备好与b.
第 13 行：与第 12 行相同，但用于b.
第 15 行：拆分非内置 ( <=and >=) 和内置运算符之间的比较案例。
第 16 行：如果比较运算符被分别<=测试为a<b or a=b->= a<b or a=b
第 17 行：测试内置比较运算符。
<>
# All tests
function P { printf "$@"; }
function EXPECT { printf "$@"; }
function CODE { awk $BASH_LINENO'==NR{print " "$2,$3,$4}' "$0"; }
P 'Note: ++ (true) and __ (false) mean that V works correctly.\n'
V 2.5 '!=' 2.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5 '=' 2.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5 '==' 2.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5a '==' 2.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5a '<' 2.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5a '>' 2.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5b '>' 2.5a && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5b '<' 2.5a && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.5 '<' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5 '>' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.5b '>' 3.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5b '<' 3.5 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.6 '<' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.6 '>' 3.5b && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5b '<' 3.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.5b '>' 3.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5.7 '<=' 2.5.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.4.10 '<' 2.4.9 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.4.10 '<' 2.5.9 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.4.10 '<' 2.5.9 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.4.8 '>' 2.4.10 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 2.5.6 '<=' 2.5.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 2.5.6 '>=' 2.5.6 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.0 '<' 3.0.3 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.0002 '<' 3.0003.3 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 3.0002 '>' 3.0003.3 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.0003.3 '<' 3.0002 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
V 3.0003.3 '>' 3.0002 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 4.0-RC2 '>' 4.0-RC1 && P + || P _; EXPECT +; CODE
V 4.0-RC2 '<' 4.0-RC1 && P + || P _; EXPECT _; CODE
我实现了一个函数，该函数返回与Dennis Williamson相同的结果，但使用的行数更少。它最初会执行健全性检查，这会导致1..0他的测试失败（我认为应该是这种情况），但他的所有其他测试均通过以下代码通过：
#!/bin/bash
version_compare() {
if [[ $1 =~ ^([0-9]+\.?)+$ && $2 =~ ^([0-9]+\.?)+$ ]]; then
local l=(${1//./ }) r=(${2//./ }) s=${#l[@]}; [[ ${#r[@]} -gt ${#l[@]} ]] && s=${#r[@]}
for i in $(seq 0 $((s - 1))); do
[[ ${l[$i]} -gt ${r[$i]} ]] && return 1
[[ ${l[$i]} -lt ${r[$i]} ]] && return 2
done
return 0
else
echo "Invalid version number given"
exit 1
fi
}
这是一个不使用外部命令的简单 Bash 函数。它适用于最多包含三个数字部分的版本字符串 - 小于 3 也可以。它可以很容易地扩展更多。它实现了=，<，<=，>，>=，和!=条件。
#!/bin/bash
vercmp() {
version1=$1 version2=$2 condition=$3
IFS=. v1_array=($version1) v2_array=($version2)
v1=$((v1_array[0] * 100 + v1_array[1] * 10 + v1_array[2]))
v2=$((v2_array[0] * 100 + v2_array[1] * 10 + v2_array[2]))
diff=$((v2 - v1))
[[ $condition = '=' ]] && ((diff == 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '!=' ]] && ((diff != 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '<' ]] && ((diff > 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '<=' ]] && ((diff >= 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '>' ]] && ((diff < 0)) && return 0
[[ $condition = '>=' ]] && ((diff <= 0)) && return 0
return 1
}
这是测试：
for tv1 in '*' 1.1.1 2.5.3 7.3.0 0.5.7 10.3.9 8.55.32 0.0.1; do
for tv2 in 3.1.1 1.5.3 4.3.0 0.0.7 0.3.9 11.55.32 10.0.0 '*'; do
for c in '=' '>' '<' '>=' '<=' '!='; do
vercmp "$tv1" "$tv2" "$c" && printf '%s\n' "$tv1 $c $tv2 is true" || printf '%s\n' "$tv1 $c $tv2 is false"
done
done
done
测试输出的一个子集：
<snip>
* >= * is true
* <= * is true
* != * is true
1.1.1 = 3.1.1 is false
1.1.1 > 3.1.1 is false
1.1.1 < 3.1.1 is true
1.1.1 >= 3.1.1 is false
1.1.1 <= 3.1.1 is true
1.1.1 != 3.1.1 is true
1.1.1 = 1.5.3 is false
1.1.1 > 1.5.3 is false
1.1.1 < 1.5.3 is true
1.1.1 >= 1.5.3 is false
1.1.1 <= 1.5.3 is true
1.1.1 != 1.5.3 is true
1.1.1 = 4.3.0 is false
1.1.1 > 4.3.0 is false
<snip>
这是一个基于Dennis Williamson 发布的答案的纯 Bash 解决方案，支持修订版（例如“1.0-r1”）。它可以轻松修改以支持“-RC1”之类的内容，或者通过更改正则表达式从更复杂的字符串中提取版本。
有关实现的详细信息，请参阅代码内注释和/或启用包含的调试代码：
#!/bin/bash
# Compare two version strings [$1: version string 1 (v1), $2: version string 2 (v2)]
# Return values:
# 0: v1 == v2
# 1: v1 > v2
# 2: v1 < v2
# Based on: /sf/answers/281754581/ by Dennis Williamson
function compare_versions() {
# Trivial v1 == v2 test based on string comparison
[[ "$1" == "$2" ]] && return 0
# Local variables
local regex="^(.*)-r([0-9]*)$" va1=() vr1=0 va2=() vr2=0 len i IFS="."
# Split version strings into arrays, extract trailing revisions
if [[ "$1" =~ ${regex} ]]; then
va1=(${BASH_REMATCH[1]})
[[ -n "${BASH_REMATCH[2]}" ]] && vr1=${BASH_REMATCH[2]}
else
va1=($1)
fi
if [[ "$2" =~ ${regex} ]]; then
va2=(${BASH_REMATCH[1]})
[[ -n "${BASH_REMATCH[2]}" ]] && vr2=${BASH_REMATCH[2]}
else
va2=($2)
fi
# Bring va1 and va2 to same length by filling empty fields with zeros
(( ${#va1[@]} > ${#va2[@]} )) && len=${#va1[@]} || len=${#va2[@]}
for ((i=0; i < len; ++i)); do
[[ -z "${va1[i]}" ]] && va1[i]="0"
[[ -z "${va2[i]}" ]] && va2[i]="0"
done
# Append revisions, increment length
va1+=($vr1)
va2+=($vr2)
len=$((len+1))
# *** DEBUG ***
#echo "TEST: '${va1[@]} (?) ${va2[@]}'"
# Compare version elements, check if v1 > v2 or v1 < v2
for ((i=0; i < len; ++i)); do
if (( 10#${va1[i]} > 10#${va2[i]} )); then
return 1
elif (( 10#${va1[i]} < 10#${va2[i]} )); then
return 2
fi
done
# All elements are equal, thus v1 == v2
return 0
}
# ---------- everything below this line is just for testing ----------
# Test compare_versions [$1: version string 1, $2: version string 2, $3: expected result]
function test_compare_versions() {
local op
compare_versions "$1" "$2"
case $? in
0) op="==" ;;
1) op=">" ;;
2) op="<" ;;
esac
if [[ "$op" == "$3" ]]; then
echo -e "\e[1;32mPASS: '$1 $op $2'\e[0m"
else
echo -e "\e[1;31mFAIL: '$1 $3 $2' (result: '$1 $op $2')\e[0m"
fi
}
echo -e "\nThe following tests should pass:"
while read -r test; do
test_compare_versions $test
done << EOF
1 1 ==
2.1 2.2 <
3.0.4.10 3.0.4.2 >
4.08 4.08.01 <
3.2.1.9.8144 3.2 >
3.2 3.2.1.9.8144 <
1.2 2.1 <
2.1 1.2 >
5.6.7 5.6.7 ==
1.01.1 1.1.1 ==
1.1.1 1.01.1 ==
1 1.0 ==
1.0 1 ==
1.0.2.0 1.0.2 ==
1..0 1.0 ==
1.0 1..0 ==
1.0-r1 1.0-r3 <
1.0-r9 2.0 <
3.0-r15 3.0-r9 >
...-r1 ...-r2 <
2.0-r1 1.9.8.21-r2 >
1.0 3.8.9.32-r <
-r -r3 <
-r3 -r >
-r3 -r3 ==
-r -r ==
0.0-r2 0.0.0.0-r2 ==
1.0.0.0-r2 1.0-r2 ==
0.0.0.1-r7 -r9 >
0.0-r0 0 ==
1.002.0-r6 1.2.0-r7 <
001.001-r2 1.1-r2 ==
5.6.1-r0 5.6.1 ==
EOF
echo -e "\nThe following tests should fail:"
while read -r test; do
test_compare_versions $test
done << EOF
1 1 >
3.0.5-r5 3..5-r5 >
4.9.21-r3 4.8.22-r9 <
1.0-r 1.0-r1 ==
-r 1.0-r >
-r1 0.0-r1 <
-r2 0-r2 <
EOF
这也是一个pure bash解决方案，因为 printf 是内置的 bash。
function ver()
# Description: use for comparisons of version strings.
# $1 : a version string of form 1.2.3.4
# use: (( $(ver 1.2.3.4) >= $(ver 1.2.3.3) )) && echo "yes" || echo "no"
{
printf "%02d%02d%02d%02d" ${1//./ }
}