鉴于一个特征,我们可能希望为许多类型实现它.
pub trait RTypeUnit {
fn zero() -> Self;
fn one() -> Self;
}
impl RTypeUnit for usize { fn zero() -> usize { 0 } fn one() -> usize { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for isize { fn zero() -> isize { 0 } fn one() -> isize { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for u64 { fn zero() -> u64 { 0 } fn one() -> u64 { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for i64 { fn zero() -> i64 { 0 } fn one() -> i64 { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for u32 { fn zero() -> u32 { 0 } fn one() -> u32 { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for i32 { fn zero() -> i32 { 0 } fn one() -> i32 { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for u16 { fn zero() -> u16 { 0 } fn one() -> u16 { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for i16 { fn zero() -> i16 { 0 } fn one() -> i16 { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for u8 { fn zero() -> u8 { 0 } fn one() -> u8 { 1 } }
impl RTypeUnit for i8 { fn zero() -> i8 { 0 } fn one() -> i8 { 1 } }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
避免为每种类型写出函数的惯用方法是什么?我应该使用默认实现,还是宏?
我知道num
这些特定方法的箱子,但我很想知道如何在一般情况下这样做.
根据Rust参考:
实现是实现特定类型的特征的项.
看看的实现Zero
,并One
在文档(因为锈1.11过时了,我删除了简洁的废弃属性):
pub trait Zero: Sized {
fn zero() -> Self;
}
pub trait One: Sized {
fn one() -> Self;
}
macro_rules! zero_one_impl {
($($t:ty)*) => ($(
impl Zero for $t {
#[inline]
fn zero() -> Self { 0 }
}
impl One for $t {
#[inline]
fn one() -> Self { 1 }
}
)*)
}
zero_one_impl! { u8 u16 u32 u64 usize i8 i16 i32 i64 isize }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果标准文档用宏做了,我怀疑是否存在更好的方法.
归档时间: |
|
查看次数: |
90 次 |
最近记录: |