Scala中模式匹配的速度有多快

Lif*_*ang 5 scala

我是Scala的新手.当我通过阅读其他人编写的Scala代码来学习它时,我在Scala代码中发现的与其他语言不同的一个最显着特征是它的模式匹配.

与此同时,我感受到它带来的便利性和表现力,我不禁对它背后的潜在性能成本感到好奇 - 一般来说,速度有多快match

首先,没有"高级"功能,例如匹配构造函数的参数,match在Scala,IMO中,是switch-case其他语言的对应物.例如,

color match {
  0 => println "color is red!"
  1 => println "color is green!"
  2 => println "color is blue!"
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

作为一个新手,我想知道上面的代码是否与if-else语句中的等效代码一样快?

其次,现在恢复这些"高级"功能,例如:

expr match {
  Animal(name) => ...
  Animal(name, age) => ...
  Animal(_, _, id) => ...
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

至于上面的代码或匹配的其他功能(列表匹配,配对匹配等),我很好奇Scala如何实现这些花哨的用法?最重要的是,我能期望这些代码有多快?(比方说,它们仍然和match第一种情况一样快吗?或者可能稍微慢一些?或者由于使用某些技术如反射而极慢?)

提前致谢!

dve*_*eim 8

第一个片段被转换为字节码TableSwitch(或LookupSwitch),并且与Java的开关/案例一样快:

scala> def foo(i: Int) = i match {
     | case 1 => 2
     | case 2 => 10
     | case 3 => 42
     | case _ => 777
     | }
foo: (i: Int)Int

scala> :javap -c foo
Compiled from "<console>"
public class  {
  public static final  MODULE$;

  public static {};
    Code:
       0: new           #2                  // class
       3: invokespecial #12                 // Method "<init>":()V
       6: return

  public int foo(int);
    Code:
       0: iload_1
       1: istore_2
       2: iload_2
       3: tableswitch   { // 1 to 3
                     1: 44
                     2: 39
                     3: 34
               default: 28
          }
      28: sipush        777
      31: goto          45
      34: bipush        42
      36: goto          45
      39: bipush        10
      41: goto          45
      44: iconst_2
      45: ireturn

  public ();
    Code:
       0: aload_0
       1: invokespecial #18                 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
       4: aload_0
       5: putstatic     #20                 // Field MODULE$:L;
       8: return
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

第二个剪切被转换为一堆unapply/isInstanceOf/null checks调用,并且(显然)慢于tableswitch.但它具有相同(或更好,如果编译器可以优化某些东西)性能作为手动检查通过isInstanceOf(没有反射或类似的东西):

scala> case class Foo(s: String, i: Int)
defined class Foo

scala> def bar(foo: Foo) = foo match {
     | case Foo("test", _) => 1
     | case Foo(_, 42) => 2
     | case _ => 3
     | }
bar: (foo: Foo)Int

scala> :javap -c bar
Compiled from "<console>"
public class  {
  public static final  MODULE$;

  public static {};
    Code:
       0: new           #2                  // class
       3: invokespecial #12                 // Method "<init>":()V
       6: return

  public int bar(Foo);
    Code:
       0: aload_1
       1: astore_2
       2: aload_2
       3: ifnull        26
       6: aload_2
       7: invokevirtual #20                 // Method Foo.s:()Ljava/lang/String;
      10: astore_3
      11: ldc           #22                 // String test
      13: aload_3
      14: invokevirtual #26                 // Method java/lang/Object.equals:(Ljava/lang/Object;)Z
      17: ifeq          26
      20: iconst_1
      21: istore        4
      23: goto          52
      26: aload_2
      27: ifnull        49
      30: aload_2
      31: invokevirtual #30                 // Method Foo.i:()I
      34: istore        5
      36: bipush        42
      38: iload         5
      40: if_icmpne     49
      43: iconst_2
      44: istore        4
      46: goto          52
      49: iconst_3
      50: istore        4
      52: iload         4
      54: ireturn

  public ();
    Code:
       0: aload_0
       1: invokespecial #34                 // Method java/lang/Object."<init>":()V
       4: aload_0
       5: putstatic     #36                 // Field MODULE$:L;
       8: return
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)