当在Roslyn中引入操作时,其中一个目标是提供降低的操作(我认为这是在设计审查会议视频中),据我所知,应该为高级别的隐式编译器操作提供显式操作.我在Roslyn看到了Lowering目录,但是那里的类是内部的.现在可以降低操作或没有公共API可用吗?
在下面的示例中,已经删除了一些隐式部分 - 为表达式主体添加return语句并为重载运算符公开符号.但前后增量仅因种类而异.
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Semantics;
using System.Linq;
namespace so39468373
{
internal static class Program
{
private static void Main()
{
var tree = CSharpSyntaxTree.ParseText(@"
public class c
{
public static c operator ++(c o) { return o; }
static c pre(c o) => ++o;
static c post(c o) => o++;
public static void Main() {}
}");
var mscorlib = MetadataReference.CreateFromFile(typeof(object).Assembly.Location);
var compilation = CSharpCompilation.Create(null, new[] { tree }, new[] { mscorlib });
var model = compilation.GetSemanticModel(tree);
foreach (var node in tree.GetRoot().DescendantNodes().OfType<ArrowExpressionClauseSyntax>())
{
var operation = model.GetOperation(node);
var block = (IBlockStatement)operation;
var statement = (IReturnStatement)block.Statements.First();
var increment = (IIncrementExpression)statement.ReturnedValue;
// How to get lowered operations for increment here?
}
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
github上的代码 - https://github.com/isanych/so-39468373
小智 0
检查这个例子将帮助你解决他的问题
using System.Collections.Immutable;
using System.Diagnostics;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Symbols;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Syntax;
using Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Text;
namespace Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp
{
/// <summary>
/// The dynamic operation factories below return this struct so that the caller
/// have the option of separating the call-site initialization from its invocation.
///
/// Most callers just call <see cref="ToExpression"/> to get the combo but some (object and array initializers)
/// hoist all call-site initialization code and emit multiple invocations of the same site.
/// </summary>
internal struct LoweredDynamicOperation
{
private readonly SyntheticBoundNodeFactory _factory;
private readonly TypeSymbol _resultType;
private readonly ImmutableArray<LocalSymbol> _temps;
public readonly BoundExpression SiteInitialization;
public readonly BoundExpression SiteInvocation;
public LoweredDynamicOperation(SyntheticBoundNodeFactory factory, BoundExpression siteInitialization, BoundExpression siteInvocation, TypeSymbol resultType, ImmutableArray<LocalSymbol> temps)
{
_factory = factory;
_resultType = resultType;
_temps = temps;
this.SiteInitialization = siteInitialization;
this.SiteInvocation = siteInvocation;
}
public static LoweredDynamicOperation Bad(
BoundExpression loweredReceiver,
ImmutableArray<BoundExpression> loweredArguments,
BoundExpression loweredRight,
TypeSymbol resultType)
{
var children = ArrayBuilder<BoundNode>.GetInstance();
children.AddOptional(loweredReceiver);
children.AddRange(loweredArguments);
children.AddOptional(loweredRight);
return LoweredDynamicOperation.Bad(resultType, children.ToImmutableAndFree());
}
public static LoweredDynamicOperation Bad(TypeSymbol resultType, ImmutableArray<BoundNode> children)
{
Debug.Assert(children.Length > 0);
var bad = new BoundBadExpression(children[0].Syntax, LookupResultKind.Empty, ImmutableArray<Symbol>.Empty, children, resultType);
return new LoweredDynamicOperation(null, null, bad, resultType, default(ImmutableArray<LocalSymbol>));
}
public BoundExpression ToExpression()
{
if (_factory == null)
{
Debug.Assert(SiteInitialization == null && SiteInvocation is BoundBadExpression && _temps.IsDefaultOrEmpty);
return SiteInvocation;
}
// TODO (tomat): we might be able to use SiteInvocation.Type instead of resultType once we stop using GetLoweredType
if (_temps.IsDefaultOrEmpty)
{
return _factory.Sequence(new[] { SiteInitialization }, SiteInvocation, _resultType);
}
else
{
return new BoundSequence(_factory.Syntax, _temps, ImmutableArray.Create(SiteInitialization), SiteInvocation, _resultType) { WasCompilerGenerated = true };
}
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1153 次 |
| 最近记录: |