如何等待一个线程在Objective-C中完成

nod*_*nja 14 multithreading cocoa-touch background objective-c nsthread

我正在尝试使用我在某处下载的类中的方法.程序执行继续时,该方法在后台执行.在此方法完成之前,我不想让程序继续执行.我怎么做?

jps*_*ain 39

这是使用GCD执行此操作的另一种方法:



- (void)main
{
    [self doStuffInOperations];
}

- (void)doStuffInGCD
{
    dispatch_group_t d_group = dispatch_group_create();
    dispatch_queue_t bg_queue = dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0);

    dispatch_group_async(d_group, bg_queue, ^{
        [self doSomething:@"a"];
    });

    dispatch_group_async(d_group, bg_queue, ^{
        [self doSomething:@"b"];
    });

    dispatch_group_async(d_group, bg_queue, ^{
        [self doSomething:@"c"];
    });


    // you can do this to synchronously wait on the current thread:
    dispatch_group_wait(d_group, DISPATCH_TIME_FOREVER);
    dispatch_release(d_group);
    NSLog(@"All background tasks are done!!");


    // ****  OR  ****

    // this if you just want something to happen after those are all done:
    dispatch_group_notify(d_group, dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
        dispatch_release(d_group);
        NSLog(@"All background tasks are done!!");        
    });
}

- (void)doSomething:(id)arg
{
    // do whatever you want with the arg here 
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • 干杯! 这种方法更好 (4认同)

jps*_*ain 9

使用NSOperationQueue,就像这样
(从内存中原谅任何小错误 - 你会得到基本的想法):


// ivars
NSOperationQueue *opQueue = [[NSOperationQueue alloc] init];
// count can be anything you like
[opQueue setMaxConcurrentOperationCount:5];

- (void)main
{
    [self doStuffInOperations];
}

// method
- (void)doStuffInOperations
{
    // do parallel task A
    [opQueue addOperation:[[[NSInvocationOperation alloc] initWithTarget:self selector:@selector(doSomething:) object:@"a"] autorelease]];

    // do parallel task B
    [opQueue addOperation:[[[NSInvocationOperation alloc] initWithTarget:self selector:@selector(doSomething:) object:@"b"] autorelease]];

    // do parallel task C
    [opQueue addOperation:[[[NSInvocationOperation alloc] initWithTarget:self selector:@selector(doSomething:) object:@"c"] autorelease]];


    [opQueue waitUntilAllOperationsHaveFinished];

    // now, do stuff that requires A, B, and C to be finished, and they should be finished much faster because they are in parallel.
}

- (void)doSomething:(id)arg
{
    // do whatever you want with the arg here 
    // (which is in the background, 
    // because all NSOperations added to NSOperationQueues are.)
}


Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • 我知道我没有问过这个问题,但这是我正在寻找我的应用程序,因为我有竞争条件,我知道他们是因为我可以点击更快,然后代码可以完成因此视图的部分负载条件.这解决了我的大问题.所以,谢谢你,先生,我觉得这应该被标记为真正的答案,因为它没有使用解决方法,并且正在将线程安全编码与ios库相结合. (2认同)

dre*_*kka 6

我的第一个倾向是不做你的建议.我之前使用的技术是为线程提供一个选择器,用于原始对象(位于主线程上)中的方法.当第二个线程启动时,主线程继续执行,但在显示屏上显示某种忙碌指示符.这允许用户交互在需要时继续.

当第二个线程结束时,就在它关闭之前,它会调用主线程上的选择器.然后,选择器引用的方法从显示中删除忙指示符并告诉主线程更新,获取第二个线程生成的任何数据.

我成功地将这个用于访问Web服务的应用程序(在第二个线程上),然后在返回数据后更新显示而不锁定它.这使用户体验更好.


Mik*_*hov 5

对于这种情况,我通常使用NSCondition类.

//this method executes in main thread/queue
- (void)waitForJob
{
    id __weak selfWeak = self;
    NSCondition *waitHandle = [NSCondition new];
    [waitHandle lock];
    dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_BACKGROUND, 0), ^{
        [selfWeak doSomethingLongtime];
        [waitHandle signal];
    });
    //waiting for background thread finished
    [waitHandle waitUntilDate:[NSDate dateWithTimeIntervalSinceNow:60]];
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


v01*_*01d 0

我建议在您自己的方法中结束对类方法的调用,并在完成后设置一个布尔值。例如:

BOOL isThreadRunning = NO;
- (void)beginThread {   
    isThreadRunning = YES;

    [self performSelectorInBackground:@selector(backgroundThread) withObject:nil];
}
- (void)backgroundThread {
    [myClass doLongTask];

    // Done!
    isThreadRunning = NO;
}
- (void)waitForThread {
    if (! isThreadRunning) {
        // Thread completed
        [self doSomething];
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

您希望如何处理等待取决于您:也许使用 [NSThread sleepForTimeInterval:1] 或类似的轮询,或者每个运行循环向自己发送一条消息。