为什么使用Python mmap模块要比从C++调用POSIX mmap慢得多?

Say*_*iss 0 c++ python performance posix mmap

C++代码:

#include <string>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/time.h>

using namespace std;
#define FILE_MODE (S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH)

int main() {
    timeval tv1, tv2, tv3, tve;
    gettimeofday(&tv1, 0);
    int size = 0x1000000;
    int fd = open("data", O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, FILE_MODE);
    ftruncate(fd, size);
    char *data = (char *) mmap(0, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
    for(int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
        data[i] = 'S';
    }
    munmap(data, size);
    close(fd);
    gettimeofday(&tv2, 0);
    timersub(&tv2, &tv1, &tve);
    printf("Time elapsed: %ld.%06lds\n", (long int) tve.tv_sec, (long int) tve.tv_usec);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Python代码:

import mmap
import time

t1 = time.time()
size = 0x1000000

f = open('data/data', 'w+')
f.truncate(size)
f.close()

file = open('data/data', 'r+b')
buffer = mmap.mmap(file.fileno(), 0)

for i in xrange(size):
    buffer[i] = 'S'

buffer.close()
file.close()
t2 = time.time()
print "Time elapsed: %.3fs" % (t2 - t1)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我认为这两个程序基本相同,因为C++和Python调用相同的系统调用(mmap).

但Python版本比C++慢得多:

Python: Time elapsed: 1.981s
C++:    Time elapsed: 0.062143s
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

请问任何人解释为什么mmap Python比C++慢得多?


环境:

C++:

$ c++ --version
Apple LLVM version 7.3.0 (clang-703.0.31)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.5.0
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

蟒蛇:

$ python --version
Python 2.7.11 :: Anaconda 4.0.0 (x86_64)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Dan*_*iel 6

不是mmap更慢,而是用值填充数组.众所周知,Python在进行基本操作时会很慢.使用更高级别的操作:

buffer[:] = 'S' * size
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)