dr *_*rry 1 asynchronous scala future
下面的代码是实际代码的简化版本.我们以"继承"的域模型case object FutTest和case class FutTest,这是我们不能修改.实际的域模型是从数据库提供的,所以我认为它Future approach是有效的,但它会导致我不理解的问题.
import org.scalatest.FunSpec
import scala.concurrent.Future
import scala.concurrent.ExecutionContext.Implicits.global
case object FutTest {
def create(sz: Int) = { FutTest(sz) }
}
case class FutTest(size: Int)
class FutureTest extends FunSpec {
def one(v: Int): Future[FutTest] = {
Future { FutTest.create(v) }
}
def two(t: FutTest) = {
Future { FutTest.create(t.size) }
}
def compileError1: Future[FutTest] = {
one(10).map(f => two(f))
}
def compileError2: Future[FutTest] = {
for { o <- one(10) } yield (two(o))
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
错误消息:
[INFO] Using incremental compilation
[INFO] Compiling 7 Scala sources and 5 .. target/test-classes...
[ERROR] domain.FutureTest.scala:25: type mismatch;
found : scala.concurrent.Future[domain.FutTest]
required: domain.FutTest
[ERROR] one(10).map(f => two(f))
[ERROR] ^
[ERROR] domain/FutureTest.scala:29: type mismatch;
found : scala.concurrent.Future[domain.FutTest]
required: domain.FutTest
[ERROR] for { o <- one(10) } yield (two(o))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我尝试使用plain Int代替上面的代码FutTest而且一切都很好.为什么编译器会抱怨,如何在不触及现有域的情况下解决这个问题.
flatMap就是你想要的.
one(10).flatMap(f => two(f))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
要么
one(10).flatMap(two)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
用于理解,
for { o <- one(10); t <- two(o) } yield t
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)