C++将抽象类的派生对象添加到另一个没有悬空指针的类中?

sil*_*twf 0 c++ containers abstract-class dangling-pointer

我有一个简单的容器类,指向一个抽象类,我有函数来获取/设置容器类中的指针.更具体地说,这个类看起来像这样:

class Container
{
    Abstract* thing;
public:
    void set(Abstract &obj)
    {
        thing = &obj; //danger of dangling pointer
    }

    Abstract* get()
    {
        return thing;
    }
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Abstract是一个抽象类.可以看出,存在悬挂指针的危险.我知道我可以制作一个对象的副本(新),然后指向它.但我无法创建抽象类的实例.有什么解决方案吗?


以下是更多信息:

类定义

class Abstract
{
public:
    virtual void something() = 0;
};

class Base : public Abstract
{
    int a;
public:
    Base() {}
    Base(int a) : a(a){}
    virtual void something()
    {
        cout << "Base" << endl;
    }
};

class Derived : public Base
{
    int b;
public:
    Derived() {}
    Derived(int a, int b) : Base(a), b(b){}
    virtual void something()
    {
        cout << "Derived" << endl;
    }
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

简单的测试

void setBase(Container &toSet)
{
    Base base(15);
    toSet.set(base);
}

void setDerived(Container &toSet)
{
    Derived derived(10, 30);
    toSet.set(derived);
}

int main()
{
    Container co;

    Base base(15);
    Derived derived(10, 30);

    Base *basePtr;
    Derived *derivedPtr;

    //This is fine
    co.set(base);
    basePtr = static_cast<Base *>(co.get());
    basePtr->something();

    //This is fine
    co.set(derived);
    derivedPtr = static_cast<Derived *>(co.get());
    derivedPtr->something();

    //Reset
    basePtr = nullptr;
    derivedPtr = nullptr;

    //Dangling pointer!
    setBase(co);
    basePtr = static_cast<Base *>(co.get());
    basePtr->something();

    //Dangling pointer!
    setDerived(co);
    derivedPtr = static_cast<Derived *>(co.get());
    derivedPtr->something();

    return 0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

And*_*dyG 6

您需要做的是具体地定义您的内存所有权.

Container::set接受Abstract引用的实例,这通常不意味着所有权转移:

 void set(Abstract &obj){...} // Caller retains ownership of obj, but now we have a weak reference to it
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

然后删除的责任不在你身上.

Container::get返回一个暗示所有权的指针,表示调用的人set不应使传递的对象无效.

Abstract* get(){...}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

正如您所说,这可能会有问题.

你有几个选择

  • Container使用适当的文档(代码合同)对这些内存所有权语义进行编码
  • 使用类似的智能指针 std::shared_ptr

在前一种情况下,它是否有效取决于用户阅读和理解您的API,然后表现得很好.在后一种情况下,指针对象拥有自己,并在最后一个实例超出范围时删除分配的内存.

 void set(std::shared_ptr<Abstract> obj){...} 
// now Container participates in the lifetime of obj, 
// and it's harder to nullify the underlying object 
// (you'd have to be intentionally misbehaving)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)