Ruby中的规范数组差异示例是:
[ 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5 ] - [ 1, 2, 4 ] #=> [ 3, 3, 5 ]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
取而代之的是获得以下行为的最佳方法是什么?
[ 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5 ].subtract_once([ 1, 2, 4 ]) #=> [ 1, 2, 3, 3, 5 ]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
也就是说,只从第一个数组中删除第二个数组中每个匹配项的第一个实例.
gle*_*ebm 12
减去它们在其他数组或任何Enumerable中出现的次数:
class Array
# Subtract each passed value once:
# %w(1 2 3 1).subtract_once %w(1 1 2) # => ["3"]
# [ 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5 ].subtract_once([ 1, 2, 4 ]) => [1, 2, 3, 3, 5]
# Time complexity of O(n + m)
def subtract_once(values)
counts = values.inject(Hash.new(0)) { |h, v| h[v] += 1; h }
reject { |e| counts[e] -= 1 unless counts[e].zero? }
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
减去每个唯一值一次:
require 'set'
class Array
# Subtract each unique value once:
# %w(1 2 2).subtract_once_uniq %w(1 2 2) # => [2]
# Time complexity of O((n + m) * log m)
def subtract_once_uniq(values)
# note that set is implemented
values_set = Set.new values.to_a
reject { |e| values_set.delete(e) if values_set.include?(e) }
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Tom*_*haw 10
class Array
def subtract_once(b)
h = b.inject({}) {|memo, v|
memo[v] ||= 0; memo[v] += 1; memo
}
reject { |e| h.include?(e) && (h[e] -= 1) >= 0 }
end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我相信这就是我想要的.非常感谢@glebm
这是我到目前为止所能想到的:
[1, 2, 4].each { |x| ary.delete_at ary.index(x) }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)