Luc*_*tti 13 arrays sorting generics introspection swift
给定一个数组定义如下
let list: [Any]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想将其排序WHEN
ElementElement是Comparable.所以我需要一个函数,当数组以类似下面的方式填充时
let list: [Any] = [10, 11, 0, 2, -1]
let list: [Any] = ["Red", "Green", "Blue"]
let list: [Any] = [true, false, true, true]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
确实返回排序的数组.
另一方面,当list包含以下示例之一时
let list: [Any] = [CGPointZero, CGPoint(x:1, y:1)] // CGPoint is not comparable
let list: [Any] = [10, "Hello"] // Values of different types
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我想要nil作为回报值.
任何的想法?
编译时间解决方案
extension _ArrayType where Generator.Element == Any {
func sortQ() -> Any? {
return nil
}
}
extension _ArrayType where Generator.Element: Comparable {
func sortQ() -> [Self.Generator.Element] {
return self.sort(<)
}
}
// Because Bool is not comparable by default...
extension Bool: Comparable {
}
public func < (lhs: Bool, rhs: Bool) -> Bool {
return !lhs && rhs // or Int(lhs) < Int(rhs)
}
[10, 11, 0, 2, -1].sortQ() //[-1, 0, 2, 10, 11]
["Red", "Green", "Blue"].sortQ() //["Blue", "Green", "Red"]
[true, false, true, true].sortQ() //[false, true, true, true]
[CGPointZero, CGPoint(x:1, y:1)].sortQ() //nil
[10, "Hello"].sortQ() //nil
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
运行时解决方案:
UPDATE
这是非最终状态.问题在于铸造具有可比性.恕我直言,这是不可能的.到目前为止,我还不知道有关可选类型的技巧.无论如何,甚至不能转换元类型,因为直到运行时才知道类型.我的弱解决方法是列出支持的可比类型:
extension _ArrayType {
func sortQ() -> [Generator.Element]? {
var arrayOK = true
let sortedArray = sort { (firstElement, secondElement) -> Bool in
guard arrayOK else {
return false
}
let f = Mirror(reflecting: firstElement)
let s = Mirror(reflecting: secondElement)
guard f.subjectType == s.subjectType else {
arrayOK = false
return false
}
switch String(f.subjectType) {
case "Int":
return (firstElement as! Int) < (secondElement as! Int)
case "String":
return (firstElement as! String) < (secondElement as! String)
case "Bool":
return (firstElement as! Bool) < (secondElement as! Bool)
default:
arrayOK = false
return false
}
}
return arrayOK ? sortedArray : nil
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
更新2
第二种选择是以不同的方式定义可比较的协议(AnyComparable).不幸的是,它意味着为所有可比类型创建扩展.否则,在编译时,编译器无法找到正确的函数/运算符(因为它不会提前知道类型).
所以你有两个选择:
恕我直言,没有其他解决方案
protocol AnyComparable {
func compareTo(second: Any) -> Bool
}
extension AnyComparable where Self: Comparable {
func compareTo(second: Any) -> Bool {
if let secondSameType = second as? Self {
return self < secondSameType
}
return false
}
}
extension Int: AnyComparable {
}
extension String: AnyComparable {
}
extension Bool: AnyComparable {
}
extension _ArrayType {
func sortQ() -> [Generator.Element]? {
var arrayOK = true
var wantedType: Any.Type?
let sortedArray = sort { (firstElement, secondElement) -> Bool in
guard arrayOK else {
return false
}
if wantedType == nil {
wantedType = Mirror(reflecting: firstElement).subjectType
}
guard let f = firstElement as? AnyComparable where wantedType == Mirror(reflecting: secondElement).subjectType else {
arrayOK = false
return false
}
return f.compareTo(secondElement)
}
return arrayOK ? sortedArray : nil
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
目前,我写了一个小扩展来检查所有元素是否属于同一类型(我将在此处检查是否可以获得结果):
extension _ArrayType where Generator.Element == Any{
func hasEqualTypeAndComparable()->Bool{
if self.count > 0{
let firstType = self.first?.dynamicType
for val in self{
if firstType != val.dynamicType{
return false
}
}
return self.first is Comparable
}
return false
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
例:
//Example 1
var values:[Any] = [2,1,4,3,"Hola"]
values.hasEqualTypeAndComparable() // Print false
//Example 2
var values:[Any] = [2,1,4,3]
values.hasEqualTypeAndComparable() // Prints true
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)