如果在ruby代码中,则返回早期

Fil*_*uzi 5 ruby coding-style guard-clause

我看到两种写同样的东西:

def find_nest(animal)
  return unless animal.bird?
  GPS.find_nest(animal.do_crazy_stuff)
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

VS

def find_nest(animal)
  if animal.bird?
     GPS.find_nest(animal.do_crazy_stuff)
  end
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

哪一个更正确/更可取/遵循最佳实践?或者没关系?

Wan*_*ker 19

根据Ruby风格指南,

当您可以断言无效数据时,首选保护条款.保护子句是函数顶部的条件语句,可以尽快退出.

# bad
def compute_thing(thing)
  if thing[:foo]
    update_with_bar(thing)
    if thing[:foo][:bar]
      partial_compute(thing)
    else
      re_compute(thing)
    end
  end
end

# good
def compute_thing(thing)
  return unless thing[:foo]
  update_with_bar(thing[:foo])
  return re_compute(thing) unless thing[:foo][:bar]
  partial_compute(thing)
end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)


Ser*_*sev 5

这显然是个人喜好的问题。但我更喜欢早点回来。它不仅使代码“更扁平”且更易于阅读,而且还可以随着检查次数的增加而很好地扩展。例如:

  def create_terms_of_service_notification
    return if Rails.env.test?
    return if current_user.accepted_tos?
    # imagine 5 more checks here. 
    # Now imagine them as a mess of nested ifs.

    # create the notification
  end
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)