Fla*_*oot 4 c++ reference vector c++11
1)初始化两个列表A和B.
2)我们指定A = B.该操作的时间复杂度为O(1).
3)我们为B分配一个新的列表,它不会改变A.
A = [1, 2, 3]
B = [7, 8]
# A contains [1, 2, 3]
# B contains [7, 8]
#------------------------------------
A = B
# A contains [7, 8]
# B contains [7, 8]
# time complexity: O(1)
#------------------------------------
B = [55, 66, 77, 88]
# A still contains [7, 8]
# B now contains [55, 66, 77, 88]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
1)初始化两个向量A和B.
2)我们指定A = B.根据en.cppreference.com,该操作的时间复杂度为O(n).
3)我们为B分配一个新的列表,它不会改变A.
vector<int> A = {1, 2, 3};
vector<int> B = {7, 8};
// A contains [1, 2, 3]
// B contains [7, 8]
A = B;
// A contains [7, 8]
// B contains [7, 8]
// time complexity: O(n)
B = {55, 66, 77, 88};
// A still contains [7, 8]
// B now contains [55, 66, 77, 88]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我的问题
Python和C++程序之间的区别在于步骤2)的时间复杂度,其中我们指定A = B.
有没有办法让C++中的向量A指向O(1)时间内的向量B?
注意:我对C++不太熟悉,所以我甚至不知道将A和B视为C++中向量对象的引用是否有效.
由于您B在分配之后不使用值(之后A直接分配给它),您可以利用C++ 11移动语义:
vector<int> A = {1, 2, 3};
vector<int> B = {7, 8};
A = std::move(B);
// O(1), see below
// B is in indeterminate but usable state now (probably empty).
B = {55, 66, 77, 88};
// A still contains [7, 8]
// B now contains [55, 66, 77, 88]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
移动赋值运算符的时间复杂度为:
常量,除非
std::allocator_traits<allocator_type>::propagate_on_container_move_assignment()是false和分配器不比较相等(在这种情况下是线性的).
来源.