del*_*lta 14 python sql sqlite
我有一个for循环,它使用我编写的sqlite管理器类对数据库进行了许多更改,但我不确定我多久需要提交...
for i in list:
c.execute('UPDATE table x=y WHERE foo=bar')
conn.commit()
c.execute('UPDATE table x=z+y WHERE foo=bar')
conn.commit()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
基本上我的问题是我是否必须在那里调用两次提交,或者我是否可以在完成两次更改后调用它一次?
fla*_*ier 27
是否conn.commit()在每次数据库更改后的过程结束时调用一次取决于几个因素.
这是每个人第一眼就想到的:当提交对数据库的更改时,它对其他连接变得可见.除非提交,否则它仅在本地可见,用于进行更改的连接.由于有限的并发功能sqlite,数据库只能在事务打开时读取.
您可以通过运行以下脚本并调查其输出来调查发生的情况:
import os
import sqlite3
_DBPATH = "./q6996603.sqlite"
def fresh_db():
if os.path.isfile(_DBPATH):
os.remove(_DBPATH)
with sqlite3.connect(_DBPATH) as conn:
cur = conn.cursor().executescript("""
CREATE TABLE "mytable" (
"id" INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT, -- rowid
"data" INTEGER
);
""")
print "created %s" % _DBPATH
# functions are syntactic sugar only and use global conn, cur, rowid
def select():
sql = 'select * from "mytable"'
rows = cur.execute(sql).fetchall()
print " same connection sees", rows
# simulate another script accessing tha database concurrently
with sqlite3.connect(_DBPATH) as conn2:
rows = conn2.cursor().execute(sql).fetchall()
print " other connection sees", rows
def count():
print "counting up"
cur.execute('update "mytable" set data = data + 1 where "id" = ?', (rowid,))
def commit():
print "commit"
conn.commit()
# now the script
fresh_db()
with sqlite3.connect(_DBPATH) as conn:
print "--- prepare test case"
sql = 'insert into "mytable"(data) values(17)'
print sql
cur = conn.cursor().execute(sql)
rowid = cur.lastrowid
print "rowid =", rowid
commit()
select()
print "--- two consecutive w/o commit"
count()
select()
count()
select()
commit()
select()
print "--- two consecutive with commit"
count()
select()
commit()
select()
count()
select()
commit()
select()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输出:
$ python try.py
created ./q6996603.sqlite
--- prepare test case
insert into "mytable"(data) values(17)
rowid = 1
commit
same connection sees [(1, 17)]
other connection sees [(1, 17)]
--- two consecutive w/o commit
counting up
same connection sees [(1, 18)]
other connection sees [(1, 17)]
counting up
same connection sees [(1, 19)]
other connection sees [(1, 17)]
commit
same connection sees [(1, 19)]
other connection sees [(1, 19)]
--- two consecutive with commit
counting up
same connection sees [(1, 20)]
other connection sees [(1, 19)]
commit
same connection sees [(1, 20)]
other connection sees [(1, 20)]
counting up
same connection sees [(1, 21)]
other connection sees [(1, 20)]
commit
same connection sees [(1, 21)]
other connection sees [(1, 21)]
$
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以这取决于你是否能够忍受这样一种情况:一个当前的阅读器,无论是在同一个剧本中还是在另一个程序中,它有时会被两个人关闭.
当要进行大量更改时,另外两个方面将进入场景:
数据库更改的性能在很大程度上取决于您的操作方式.它已作为常见问题解答:
实际上,SQLite很容易在普通的台式计算机上每秒执行50,000或更多INSERT语句.但它每秒只会进行几十次交易.[...]
了解这里的细节绝对有帮助,所以不要犹豫,请关注链接并深入了解.另请参阅此详细分析.它是用C语言编写的,但结果与Python中的结果相似.
注意:虽然两个资源都引用INSERT,但UPDATE对于相同的参数,情况将大致相同.
如上所述,open(未提交)事务将阻止并发连接的更改.因此,通过执行它们并共同提交整个数据库,将许多更改捆绑到单个事务中是有意义的.
不幸的是,有时,计算更改可能需要一些时间.当并发访问是一个问题时,您不希望长时间锁定您的数据库.因为以某种方式收集挂起UPDATE和INSERT语句会变得相当棘手,这通常会让你在性能和独占锁定之间进行权衡.