RuS*_*uSh 9 .net c# .net-4.0 thread-safety
我在以下代码中使用.NET 4中的ConcurrentDictionary和ConcurrentQueue类.
这段代码是线程安全的吗?如果没有,我怎样才能使它成为线程安全的?
public class Page
{
public string Name {get; set; }
}
public class PageQueue
{
private ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>> pages =
new ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>>();
public void Add(int id, Page page)
{
if (!this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
this.pages[id] = new ConcurrentQueue<Page>();
this.pages[id].Enqueue(page);
}
public Page GetAndRemove(int id)
{
Page lp = null;
if(this.pages.ContainsKey(id))
this.pages[id].TryDequeue(out lp);
return lp;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
演示:
public class Demo
{
public void RunAll()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
Task.Factory.StartNew(() => Run());
}
public void Run()
{
PageQueue pq = new PageQueue();
pq.Add(1, new Page());
pq.GetAndRemove(1);
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
dtb*_*dtb 11
正如@Femaref正确指出的那样,代码中存在一些缺陷.我建议你利用ConcurrentDictionary <K,V>提供的许多方法,使代码在线程安全,而不需要lock语句:
public class PageQueue
{
private ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>> pages =
new ConcurrentDictionary<int, ConcurrentQueue<Page>>();
public void Enqueue(int id, Page page)
{
var queue = this.pages.GetOrAdd(id, _ => new ConcurrentQueue<Page>());
queue.Enqueue(page);
}
public bool TryDequeue(int id, out Page page)
{
ConcurrentQueue<Page> queue;
if (this.pages.TryGetValue(id, out queue))
{
return queue.TryDequeue(out page);
}
page = null;
return false;
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
2618 次 |
| 最近记录: |