Lam*_*rtA 3 ada circular-dependency circular-reference
假设我有两个记录:人与动物.每条记录都在一个单独的包中.
套餐人员:
with animals;
use animals;
package persons is
type person is record
...
animalref: animalPOINTER;
...
end record;
type personPOINTER is access person;
end persons;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
包装动物:
with persons;
use persons;
package animals is
type animal is record
...
ownerref: personPOINTER;
...
end record;
type animalPOINTER is access animal;
end animals;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我在这里有循环单元依赖,编译器会产生致命错误.
有没有人有解决这个问题的模式?
谢谢!
你需要limited with,这是为了解决这个问题而引入的.请参阅Ada 2005的基本原理,第4.2节.
Animals并且Persons是对称的(我的编辑器调整了布局和外壳;我已经为每个添加了一个记录组件,因此下面的演示程序可以打印一些东西):
limited with Animals;
package Persons is
-- One of the few things you can do with an incomplete type, which
-- is what Animals.Animal is in the limited view of Animals, is to
-- declare an access to it.
type AnimalPOINTER is access Animals.Animal;
type Person is record
Name : Character;
Animalref : AnimalPOINTER;
end record;
end Persons;
limited with Persons;
package Animals is
type PersonPOINTER is access Persons.Person;
type Animal is record
Name : Character;
Ownerref : PersonPOINTER;
end record;
end Animals;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
演示程序具有的全貌Animals和Persons.这个例子非常笨拙; 您可以通过向Animals和添加子程序来更好地组织事物Persons.需要注意的是,身体的Animals可以(也必须)with Persons;如果需要使用任何东西Persons.
with Ada.Text_IO; use Ada.Text_IO;
with Animals;
with Persons;
procedure Animals_And_Persons is
A : Persons.animalPOINTER := new Animals.Animal;
P : Animals.PersonPOINTER := new Persons.Person;
begin
A.all := (Name => 'a', Ownerref => P);
P.all := (Name => 'p', Animalref => A);
Put_Line (P.Name & " owns " & P.Animalref.Name);
Put_Line (A.Name & " is owned by " & A.Ownerref.Name);
end Animals_And_Persons;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
在编译和运行时给出
$ ./animals_and_persons
p owns a
a is owned by p
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
1264 次 |
| 最近记录: |