有没有办法改善这种动态轴更新工作

elT*_*oro 4 microsoft-dynamics x++ axapta dynamics-ax-2009

我正在开发AX 2009安装.工作是更新WMSOrderTrans表.这是我到目前为止所得到的:

WMSOrderTrans   wmsOrderTrans;
;

while select wmsOrderTrans
{
    if (wmsOrderTrans.BBBpackingSlipExists())
    {
        ttsBegin;
        wmsOrderTrans.selectForUpdate(true);
        wmsOrderTrans.BBBPackingSlipExists  =   NoYes::Yes;
        wmsOrderTrans.doUpdate();
        ttsCommit;
    }
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

这项工作大约需要一个小时才能完成测试系统.这让我担心生产系统的性能.

目前,代码已经被编写为具有最小的锁定问题(如果应该更新并且然后立即提交,则为每一行执行selectForUpdate).原因是,当作业运行时,用户将在系统上工作.

我的问题是,如果有一种合理的方式以较少的交易开销实现这项工作.

while select forUpdate ...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

...似乎不是一个选项,因为它会锁定表,直到作业完成.

任何输入都表示赞赏.


这是BBBPackingSlipExists方法的代码:

display boolean BBBpackingSlipExists()
    {
    InventDim               inventDimCur;
    InventDim               inventDimPackSlip;
    InventTrans             inventTransPackSlip;

    ;

    select firstonly RecId from inventTransPackSlip
        where inventTransPackSlip.InventTransId == this.inventTransId
            && (inventTransPackSlip.StatusIssue == StatusIssue::Deducted
                || inventTransPackSlip.StatusIssue == StatusIssue::Sold)
            && !inventTransPackSlip.PackingSlipReturned
        exists join inventDimCur
            where inventDimCur.inventDimId == this.inventDimId
        exists join inventDimPackSlip
            where inventDimPackSlip.inventDimId == inventTransPackSlip.inventDimId
                && inventDimCur.inventSerialId  == inventDimPackSlip.inventSerialId
    ;
if (inventTransPackSlip.RecId != 0 && this.isReserved)
{
    return true;
}
return false;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

}

Tom*_*ica 12

这看起来像是转换为基于集合逻辑的主要候选者,我会选择这样的东西.请注意,作业没有经过测试,因为我没有2009环境(这在2012年甚至没有编译),所以如果你需要更改代码,请随意将其编辑到我的答案中.

请注意,isreserved check包含在查询中,以及packingslipexists方法中的exists连接

static void Job250(Args _args)
{
    WMSOrderTrans           wmsOrderTrans;
    InventDim               inventDimCur;
    InventDim               inventDimPackSlip;
    InventTrans             inventTransPackSlip;
    ;
    wmsOrderTrans.skipDatabaseLog(true);
    wmsOrderTrans.skipDataMethods(true);
    wmsOrderTrans.skipEvents(true);
    update_recordset wmsOrderTrans setting BBBPackingSlipExists  = NoYes::Yes
        where wmsOrderTrans.isReserved
        exists join inventTransPackSlip
        where inventTransPackSlip.InventTransId == wmsOrderTrans.inventTransId
          && (inventTransPackSlip.StatusIssue == StatusIssue::Deducted
           || inventTransPackSlip.StatusIssue == StatusIssue::Sold)
          && !inventTransPackSlip.PackingSlipReturned
        exists join inventDimCur
        where inventDimCur.inventDimId == wmsOrderTrans.inventDimId
        exists join inventDimPackSlip
        where inventDimPackSlip.inventDimId == inventTransPackSlip.inventDimId
           && inventDimCur.inventSerialId  == inventDimPackSlip.inventSerialId;       
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

请参阅update_recordset上的文档以及为什么可能需要skip*方法

  • @elToro基于集合的逻辑总是比基于游标的操作更快 (2认同)