我刚写了这段代码,但我对此并不满意.
data = {}
options.each{ |k,v| data.merge!({k.to_s => v}) }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
基本上我有:
{:a => "something", :b => "something else", :c => "blah"}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
... 而且我要 ...
{"a" => "something", "b" => "something else", "c" => "blah"}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
...为了将其发送到由于某种原因不处理符号的gem.在我编写的代码中,选项是原始哈希,数据是更新的,但如果我只能使用1个变量,那就更好了.
你们怎么重构我的代码?
data = Hash[options.map{ |k,v| [k.to_s,v] }]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
对于足够有趣的哈希值,答案之间没有显着差异
require 'benchmark'
options = Hash[('aaaa'..'zzzz').map{|i| [i.to_sym,i]}]
Benchmark.bm(100) do |x|
x.report("map") {Hash[options.map{ |k,v| [k.to_s,v] }] }
x.report("zip") {Hash[options.keys.map(&:to_s).zip(options.values)]}
x.report("inject") {options.inject({}) { |h, (k, v)| h[k.to_s] = v; h }}
end
user system total real
map 3.490000 0.090000 3.580000 ( 4.049015)
zip 3.780000 0.020000 3.800000 ( 3.925876)
inject 3.710000 0.110000 3.820000 ( 4.289286)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
257 次 |
| 最近记录: |