Ric*_*lly 15 css3 reactjs reactcsstransitiongroup
我想在第一个组件淡出的两个组件之间设置动画,并在将下一个组件添加到DOM并淡入之前从DOM中删除.否则,新组件将添加到DOM并占用空间.旧组件被删除.你可以在这个小提琴中看到问题:
http://jsfiddle.net/phepyezx/4
// css snippet
.switch-enter {
opacity: 0.01;
}
.switch-enter.switch-enter-active {
opacity: 1.0;
}
.switch-leave {
opacity: 1.0;
}
.switch-leave.switch-leave-active {
opacity: 0;
}
// React snippet
<ReactCSSTransitionGroup transitionName="switch">
<div key={key} className={className}>{this.text()}</div>
</ReactCSSTransitionGroup>
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
一个不可接受的解决方案(对我来说)是在转换到新组件之前用css隐藏原始组件,如下所示:
http://jsfiddle.net/phepyezx/5
// Change to css
.switch-leave {
visibility: hidden;
height: 0px;
width: 0px;
opacity: 1.0;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有没有办法在原件移除之前"延迟"安装新组件的反应?我对速度或其他图书馆持开放态度.
谢谢
Jon*_*nan 17
另一种解决方案是使传入和传出元素占用相同的空间,例如通过使它们都处于绝对位置:
<ReactCSSTransitionGroup
className="container"
component="div"
transitionName="switch">
...
.container {
position: relative;
}
.container > div {
position: absolute;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
http://jsfiddle.net/phepyezx/7/
您可以使用transition-delay等待离开组件消失,然后才能显示输入组件,例如:
.fade-enter {
opacity: 0.01;
}
.fade-enter.fade-enter-active {
opacity: 1;
transition: opacity 1s;
transition-delay: 1s;
}
.fade-leave {
opacity: 1;
}
.fade-leave.fade-leave-active {
opacity: 0.01;
transition: opacity 1s;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Ric*_*lly 11
使用componentWillUnmount()生命周期方法解决.
http://jsfiddle.net/phepyezx/9/
这是代码:
var ReactCSSTransitionGroup = React.addons.CSSTransitionGroup;
const Off = React.createClass({
componentWillUnmount () {
this.props.handleTransitionEnd();
},
render() {
return (
<div className="off button">OFF</div>
)
}
});
const On = React.createClass({
componentWillUnmount () {
this.props.handleTransitionEnd();
},
render() {
return (
<div className="on button">ON</div>
)
}
});
var Switch = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {
on: false,
transitionEnd: true
};
},
toggle: function(e) {
this.setState({
on: !this.state.on,
transitionEnd: false
});
},
handleTransitionEnd() {
this.setState({transitionEnd: true});
},
renderOff() {
if (! this.state.on && this.state.transitionEnd) {
return (
<Off key="off" handleTransitionEnd={this.handleTransitionEnd} />
)
}
},
renderOn() {
if (this.state.on && this.state.transitionEnd) {
return (
<On key="on" handleTransitionEnd={this.handleTransitionEnd} />
)
}
},
render: function() {
return (
<div>
<button onClick={this.toggle}>Toggle</button>
<ReactCSSTransitionGroup transitionName="switch">
{this.renderOff()}
{this.renderOn()}
</ReactCSSTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
});
React.render(<Switch/>, document.getElementById("switch"));
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
和相关的CSS:
.switch-enter {
opacity: 0.01;
}
.switch-enter.switch-enter-active {
opacity: 1.0;
transition: opacity 500ms ease-in;
}
.switch-leave {
opacity: 1.0;
}
.switch-leave.switch-leave-active {
opacity: 0;
transition: opacity 500ms ease-out;
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
你可以用Jonny Buchanan的答案获得同样有效的结果,它使用绝对定位和延迟而不是componentWillUnmount()