假设我有数据类型
data Price = Price Double
data Book = Book {title :: String, bookPrice :: Price}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
用函数提取数值
priceAsDouble :: Price -> Double
priceAsDouble (Price doubleValue) = doubleValue
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在,我想在图书清单上写一个累加器,例如
go :: Double -> Book -> Double
go acc book = acc + priceAsDouble (bookPrice book)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
哪个很好并且编译.
但是,如果我将最后一行更改为
go acc book = acc + priceAsDouble $ bookPrice book
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我得到以下矛盾的编译器错误:
<interactive>:10:51:
Couldn't match expected type ‘Price -> Double’
with actual type ‘Double’
The first argument of ($) takes one argument,
but its type ‘Double’ has none
In the expression: acc + priceAsDouble $ bookPrice book
In an equation for ‘go’:
go acc book = acc + priceAsDouble $ bookPrice book
<interactive>:10:57:
Couldn't match expected type ‘Double’
with actual type ‘Price -> Double’
Probable cause: ‘priceAsDouble’ is applied to too few arguments
In the second argument of ‘(+)’, namely ‘priceAsDouble’
In the expression: acc + priceAsDouble
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
问题:我认为($)只不过是圆括号()的语法糖.显然,我错了.我想到的错误在哪里?
$ 是括号的语法糖,但它不适用于您期望的水平.
go acc book = acc + priceAsDouble $ bookPrice book
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
实际上被解释为
go acc book = (acc + priceAsDouble) (bookPrice book)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
但acc + priceAsDouble作为GHC的功能没有意义.
具有讽刺意味的是,你需要更多的括号来使它工作:
go acc book = acc + (priceAsDouble $ bookPrice book)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)