限制模板功能,仅允许某些类型

yu *_*uan 5 c++ templates c++11

这里说我有一个简单的模板功能,原则上可以接受所有类型:

template <class Type>
std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& stream, const Type subject) {
stream << "whatever, derived from subject\n";
return stream; }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我只想用这个模板来讨论几种类型,比如std :: vector和boost :: array对象.但是每当我使用cout到其他类型甚至基本类型时,例如std :: cout << int(5);,都会出现编译错误,因为现在有两种可能的operator <<(std :: ostream,int)实现一个是标准的c ++,另一个是我的模板函数.

我想问一下,是否可以限制我的模板功能,以便它只接受我指定的几种类型?这是当我使用cout << int(5)时告诉编译器忽略我的模板的方法.提前致谢.

更清楚,这就是我想要做的:

template <class Type>
std::ostream& operator<< (std::ostream& stream, const Type subject) {
if (Type == TypeA or TypeB or TypeC) //use this template and do these {...};
else //ignore this template, and use operator<< provided in standard c++ library.
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Tar*_*ama 5

为此编写一个非常通用的解决方案很难.与检查任意类型的问题Tstd::vectorstd::array在于,后者没有阶级,他们是类模板.更糟的是,std::array是与非类型模板参数类模板,所以你甚至不能有一个参数包将举行两std::vectorstd::array.

你可以通过在类型中明确地包装非类型参数来解决这个问题,但它会变得丑陋,快速.

这是我提出的一个解决方案,它将支持默认情况下没有非类型模板参数的任何类或模板类.通过添加包装类型以将非类型参数映射到类型参数,可以支持具有非类型模板参数的模板类.

namespace detail{ 
    //checks if two types are instantiations of the same class template
    template<typename T, typename U> struct same_template_as: std::false_type {};
    template<template<typename...> class X, typename... Y, typename... Z>
    struct same_template_as<X<Y...>, X<Z...>> : std::true_type {};

    //this will be used to wrap template classes with non-type args
    template <typename T>
    struct wrapImpl { using type = T; };

    //a wrapper for std::array
    template <typename T, typename N> struct ArrayWrapper;
    template <typename T, std::size_t N>
    struct ArrayWrapper<T, std::integral_constant<std::size_t, N>> {
        using type = std::array<T,N>;   
    };

    //maps std::array to the ArrayWrapper
    template <typename T, std::size_t N>
    struct wrapImpl<std::array<T,N>> {
        using type = ArrayWrapper<T,std::integral_constant<std::size_t,N>>;   
    };

    template <typename T>
    using wrap = typename wrapImpl<typename std::decay<T>::type>::type;

    //checks if a type is the same is one of the types in TList,
    //or is an instantiation of the same template as a type in TempTList
    //default case for when this is false
    template <typename T, typename TList, typename TempTList>
    struct one_of {
        using type = std::false_type;
    };

    //still types in the first list to check, but the first one doesn't match
    template <typename T, typename First, typename... Ts, typename TempTList>
    struct one_of<T, std::tuple<First, Ts...>, TempTList> {
        using type = typename one_of<T, std::tuple<Ts...>, TempTList>::type;
    };

    //type matches one in first list, return true
    template <typename T, typename... Ts, typename TempTList>
    struct one_of<T, std::tuple<T, Ts...>, TempTList> {
        using type = std::true_type;
    };

    //first list finished, check second list
    template <typename T, typename FirstTemp, typename... TempTs>
    struct one_of<T, std::tuple<>, std::tuple<FirstTemp, TempTs...>> {
        //check if T is an instantiation of the same template as first in the list
        using type = 
            typename std::conditional<same_template_as<wrap<FirstTemp>, T>::value,
              std::true_type, 
              typename one_of<T, std::tuple<>, std::tuple<TempTs...>>::type>::type;
    };
}

//top level usage
template <typename T, typename... Ts>
using one_of = typename detail::one_of<detail::wrap<T>,Ts...>::type;

struct Foo{};
struct Bar{};

template <class Type>
auto operator<< (std::ostream& stream, const Type subject)
     //is Type one of Foo or Bar, or an instantiation of std::vector or std::array
    -> typename std::enable_if<
           one_of<Type, std::tuple<Foo,Bar>, std::tuple<std::vector<int>,std::array<int,0>>
        >::value, std::ostream&>::type
{
    stream << "whatever, derived from subject\n";
    return stream; 
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

请不要使用它,这太可怕了.

Live Demo

  • 创造一个怪物感觉如何?:)我认为可以通过查看`::`,`<>`和`...`的密度来预测读取C++的局部心理痛苦的数量. (3认同)

She*_*ohn 4

你可以这样限制你的超载:

template <class T>
std::ostream& my_private_ostream( std::ostream& stream, const T& data )
    { <your implementation> }

template <class T, class A>
std::ostream& operator<< ( std::ostream& stream, const std::vector<T,A>& data )
    { return my_private_ostream(stream,data); }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

s也是如此std::array(你应该用 c++11 标记你的问题):

template <class T, size_t N>
std::ostream& operator<< ( std::ostream& stream, const std::array<T,N>& data )
    { return my_private_ostream(stream,data); }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

或者,对于看起来更像您的编辑的解决方案,您可以使用 C++11 enable_if,尽管我个人厌恶它们,因为它们往往会使代码难以阅读和维护。所以我强烈推荐之前的解决方案。

// Vector type predicate
template <class T>
struct is_vector: std::false_type {};

template <class T, class A>
struct is_vector< std::vector<T,A> >: std::true_type {};

// Array type predicate
template <class T>
struct is_array: std::false_type {};

template <class T, size_t N>
struct is_array< std::array<T,N> >: std::true_type {};

// The overload with the syntax you want
template <class Indexable>
typename std::enable_if<
    is_vector<Indexable>::value || is_array<Indexable>::value,
    std::ostream& 
>::type
operator<< ( std::ostream& stream, const Indexable& data )
    { <your implementation> }
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)