Odo*_*ois 8 scala hlist shapeless labelled-generic
假设我想穿越案例类通用表示描述这里
我已经定义了一些类型类来描述字段:
trait Described[X] extends (X => String)
object Described{
def apply[X](x: X)(implicit desc: Described[X]) = desc(x)
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
定义了一些实例:
implicit object DoubleDescribed extends Described[Double]{
def apply(x: Double) = x.formatted("%01.3f")
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
和一般用户:
import shapeless._
import shapeless.labelled.FieldType
import shapeless.ops.hlist.LeftFolder
object DescrFolder extends Poly2{
implicit def field[X, S <: Symbol](implicit desc: Described[X],
witness: Witness.Aux[S]):
Case.Aux[Seq[String], FieldType[S, X], Seq[String]] =
at[Seq[String], FieldType[S, X]](
(descrs, value) => descrs :+ f"${witness.value.name}: ${desc(value)}")
}
def describe[T <: Product, Repr <: HList](struct: T)
(implicit lgen: LabelledGeneric.Aux[T,Repr],
folder: LeftFolder.Aux[Repr, Seq[String], DescrFolder.type, Seq[String]]
): String = {
val repr = lgen.to(struct)
val descrs = folder(repr,Vector())
descrs.mkString(struct.productPrefix + "{", ",", "}")
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以现在我可以写
case class Point(x: Double, y: Double, z: Double)
describe(Point(1,2,3.0))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
得到
res1:String = Point {x:1,000,y:2,000,z:3,000}
现在我想使用shapeless标签定义一些字段元数据:
import tag._
trait Invisible
val invisible = tag[Invisible]
implicit def invisibleDescribed[X](implicit desc: Described[X])
: Described[X @@ Invisible] =
new Described[X @@ Invisible]{
def apply(x: X @@ Invisible) = desc(x: X) + "[invisible]"
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
所以Described(invisible(0.5))现在成功地产生了
res2:String = 0,500 [隐身]
但重新定义
case class Point(x: Double, y: Double, z: Double @@ Invisible)
describe(Point(1,2,invisible(3.0)))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
产生编译错误:
错误:
LeftFolder.Aux[this.Out,Seq[String],DescrFolder.type,Seq[String]]从invisibleDescribed类中的方法开始的类型的隐式扩展分歧 ...
我认为类型X with Tag[Y] with KeyTag[K,X]不是识别,FieldType[S, X]但无法猜测如何解决它.
如何定义适合LeftFolder这种情况?
shapeless你的问题根本不涉及。实际上可以简化为:
trait Described[T]
trait Invisible
implicit val doubleDescribed: Described[Double] = ???
implicit def invisibleDescribed[T](
implicit desc: Described[T]
): Described[T with Invisible] = ???
implicitly[Described[Double with Invisible]]
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Double @@ Invisible可以“表示”为Double with Invisible。注意Double with Invisible <: Double。
当编译器尝试获取隐式时,Described[Double with Invisible]它会正确地抱怨隐式扩展发散:doubleDescribed和invisibleDescribed。
回到原来的代码,一个简单的解决方法就是重写invisibleDescribed为:
implicit def invisibleDescribed[X, I <: X @@ Invisible](
implicit desc: Described[X]
): Described[I] = new Described[I]{
def apply(x: I) = desc(x: X) + "[invisible]"
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
759 次 |
| 最近记录: |