Ale*_*ist 4 xcode objective-c nszombie nszombieenabled nszombies
我是Objective-c和xcode的新手,我正在编写的应用程序正在收到臭名昭着的EXC_BAD_ACCESS错误.
几乎每个人都建议使用NSZombies开始解决问题.我想我有NSZombies正在工作,但xcode没有给我一个警告,当我的应用程序崩溃时,僵尸被消息.
在继续我的调试之前,我想运行一些代码,这些代码肯定会导致消息被发送到僵尸(解除分配的对象).
什么是简单的代码片段,其中消息被发送到解除分配的对象,导致NSZombies应该提醒我的情况?
For non-ARC code:
- (IBAction) messageZombie:(id)sender {
id a = [[NSObject alloc]init];
[a release];
NSLog(@"%@", [a description]);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
This will give you EXC_BAD_ACCESS with Zombies off, and a "message sent to deallocated instance" message, with Zombies enabled.
If your project is using ARC, then it's a bit harder to reliably-cause messages to de-allocated objects (that is the point of ARC, after all).
This works:
- (IBAction) messageZombie:(id)sender {
id a = [[NSObject alloc]init];
id __unsafe_unretained b =a;
a=nil;
NSLog(@"%@", [b description]);
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
It's probably not very similar to what your actual code is doing, because who the heck uses __unsafe_unretained, anyway? But if you just want to make sure that you've got NSZombies turned on properly, this should be a reasonable test case.
If you're looking for suspicious places in your code, then for sure look for __unsafe_unretained pointers, though you won't find any*, and double-check that the right casts are used for CoreFoundation objects that are casted to Cocoa objects.
*If your project needs to support OS X versions before 10.7, or iOS versions earlier than 5.0, then you can't use __weak pointers, so in that sort of project, you'd expect to find __unsafe_unretained used more often.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
364 次 |
| 最近记录: |