父属性的构造函数注入与setter注入

Question

我正在试图找出对一些遗留代码使用依赖注入的最佳方法,这将需要很长时间才能重构并且必须逐步完成.大多数旧类使用"Parent"属性来确定各种事物,而父属性通常通过构造函数参数传递,如下所示:

constructor TParentObject.Create;
begin
  FChildObject := TChildObject.Create(Self);
end;

constructor TChildObject.Create(AParent: TParentObject)
begin
  FParent := AParent;
end;

这是我们遗留代码库的典型代表.但是,当移动到接口和构造函数注入时,Spring4D框架在创建Child对象时不知道Parent.所以它只会得到一个新的父母而不是现有的父母.当然我可以创建一个属性getter/setter,但这表示该类的"可选"属性,它实际上是一个强制属性.有关更多说明,请参阅以下代码:

unit uInterfaces;

interface

uses
  Spring.Collections;

type

  IChildObject = interface;

  IParentObject = interface
  ['{8EA8F9A2-E627-4546-8008-0A77DA2B16F1}']
    function GetSomethingRequiredByChild: string;
    procedure SetSomethingRequiredByChild(const Value: string);
    property SomethingRequiredByChild: string read GetSomethingRequiredByChild write SetSomethingRequiredByChild;
    function GetChild: IChildObject;
    property Child: IChildObject read GetChild;
  end;

  // This introduces a property getter/setter
  // However it also implies that Parent can be NIL which it cannot
  IChildObject = interface
  ['{ECCA09A6-4A52-4BE4-A72E-2801160A9086}']
    function GetParent: IParentObject;
    procedure SetParent(const Value: IParentObject);
    property Parent: IParentObject read GetParent write SetParent;
  end;

  TParentObject = class(TInterfacedObject, IParentObject)
  private
    FChild: IChildObject;
    FSomethingRequiredByChild: string;
    function GetChild: IChildObject;
    function GetSomethingRequiredByChild: string;
    procedure SetSomethingRequiredByChild(const Value: string);
  public
    constructor Create;
  end;

  TChildObject = class(TInterfacedObject, IChildObject)
  private
    FParent: IParentObject;
    function GetParent: IParentObject;
    procedure SetParent(const Value: IParentObject);
  public
    // This requries a Parent object, but how does the Spring4D resolve the correct parent?
    constructor Create(const AParent: IParentObject);
  end;

implementation

uses
  Spring.Services;

{ TParentObject }

constructor TParentObject.Create;
begin
  // Here is the old way...
  FChild := TChildObject.Create(Self); // Old way of doing it

  // This is the Service Locator way...
  FChild := ServiceLocator.GetService<IChildObject>;
  // I would prefer that the Parent is assigned somehow by the Service Locator
  // IS THIS POSSIBLE - or am I dreaming?
  FChild.Parent := Self;
end;

function TParentObject.GetChild: IChildObject;
begin
  Result := FChild;
end;

function TParentObject.GetSomethingRequiredByChild: string;
begin
  Result := FSomethingRequiredByChild;
end;

procedure TParentObject.SetSomethingRequiredByChild(const Value: string);
begin
  FSomethingRequiredByChild := Value;
end;

{ TChildObject }

constructor TChildObject.Create(const AParent: IParentObject);
begin
  FParent := AParent;
end;

function TChildObject.GetParent: IParentObject;
begin
  Result := FParent;
end;

procedure TChildObject.SetParent(const Value: IParentObject);
begin
  FParent := Value;
end;

end.

也许有一些方法可以使用,我不知道使用DI框架设置父对象？

我希望这个问题很清楚我想要实现的目标.我很乐意在必要时提供更多描述/代码示例.

Answer 1

首先,您不应该使用服务定位器来替换ctor调用.这只是让事情变得更糟.我知道人们认为他们是聪明的,但实际上你正在取代对另一个类的一个简单的依赖,依赖于一些全局状态加上要求(消费类)控制中的一些其他代码将依赖项放入容器中.这不会导致代码更容易但更难维护.

加上你应该远离它的所有其他原因.服务定位器在遗留应用程序中的使用可能有限,无法在应用程序中间引入组合根,以便从该点启动DI,但不是以您显示的方式启动DI.

如果父母需要孩子,那么只需注射它.现在问题是如果你想创建一个父,你首先需要孩子,但孩子需要父.怎么实现呢？有两种解决方案.然而,其中一个不是纯DI兼容.

我首先展示了使用容器提供的工厂的方式(截至发布时需要最新的开发分支版本):

unit ParentChildRelationShip.Types;

interface

uses
  SysUtils,
  Spring,
  Spring.Container.Common;

type
  IChildObject = interface;

  IParentObject = interface
    ['{8EA8F9A2-E627-4546-8008-0A77DA2B16F1}']
    function GetChild: IChildObject;
    property Child: IChildObject read GetChild;
  end;

  IChildObject = interface
    ['{ECCA09A6-4A52-4BE4-A72E-2801160A9086}']
    function GetParent: IParentObject;
    property Parent: IParentObject read GetParent;
  end;

  TParentObject = class(TInterfacedObject, IParentObject)
  private
    FChild: IChildObject;
    function GetChild: IChildObject;
  public
    constructor Create(const childFactory: IFactory<IParentObject, IChildObject>);
  end;

  TChildObject = class(TInterfacedObject, IChildObject)
  private
    FParent: WeakReference<IParentObject>;
    function GetParent: IParentObject;
  public
    constructor Create(const AParent: IParentObject);
  end;

implementation

{ TParentObject }

constructor TParentObject.Create;
begin
  FChild := childFactory(Self);
end;

function TParentObject.GetChild: IChildObject;
begin
  Result := FChild;
end;

{ TChildObject }

constructor TChildObject.Create(const AParent: IParentObject);
begin
  FParent := AParent;
end;

function TChildObject.GetParent: IParentObject;
begin
  Result := FParent;
end;

end.

program ParentChildRelation;

{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}

uses
  SysUtils,
  Spring.Container,
  Spring.Container.Common,
  ParentChildRelationShip.Types in 'ParentChildRelationShip.Types.pas';

procedure Main;
var
  parent: IParentObject;
  child: IChildObject;
begin
  GlobalContainer.RegisterType<IParentObject,TParentObject>;
  GlobalContainer.RegisterType<IChildObject,TChildObject>;
  GlobalContainer.RegisterFactory<IFactory<IParentObject,IChildObject>>(TParamResolution.ByValue);
  GlobalContainer.Build;
  parent := GlobalContainer.Resolve<IParentObject>;
  child := parent.Child;
  Assert(parent = child.Parent);
end;

begin
  try
    Main;
  except
    on E: Exception do
      Writeln(E.Message);
  end;
  ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown := True;
end.

如果您不想使用工厂提供的容器,请自行明确注册.然后RegisterFactory调用替换为这个:

  GlobalContainer.RegisterInstance<TFunc<IParentObject,IChildObject>>(
    function(parent: IParentObject): IChildObject
    begin
      Result := GlobalContainer.Resolve<IChildObject>([TValue.From(parent)]);
    end);

并且构造函数参数可以更改TFunc<...>为此方法不需要RTTI(这就是您IFactory<...>在其他情况下需要的原因).

第二个版本使用字段注入,因此是纯DI不兼容 - 小心编写代码,因为它不使用容器或RTTI不起作用 - 如果你想测试这些类,没有容器可能会很难组成它们.这里的重要部分是PerResolve,它告诉容器每当需要另一个依赖项时就可以重用曾经解析过的实例.

unit ParentChildRelationShip.Types;

interface

uses
  SysUtils,
  Spring;

type
  IChildObject = interface;

  IParentObject = interface
    ['{8EA8F9A2-E627-4546-8008-0A77DA2B16F1}']
    function GetChild: IChildObject;
    property Child: IChildObject read GetChild;
  end;

  IChildObject = interface
    ['{ECCA09A6-4A52-4BE4-A72E-2801160A9086}']
    function GetParent: IParentObject;
    property Parent: IParentObject read GetParent;
  end;

  TParentObject = class(TInterfacedObject, IParentObject)
  private
    [Inject]
    FChild: IChildObject;
    function GetChild: IChildObject;
  end;

  TChildObject = class(TInterfacedObject, IChildObject)
  private
    FParent: WeakReference<IParentObject>;
    function GetParent: IParentObject;
  public
    constructor Create(const AParent: IParentObject);
  end;

implementation

function TParentObject.GetChild: IChildObject;
begin
  Result := FChild;
end;

{ TChildObject }

constructor TChildObject.Create(const AParent: IParentObject);
begin
  FParent := AParent;
end;

function TChildObject.GetParent: IParentObject;
begin
  Result := FParent;
end;

end.

program ParentChildRelation;

{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}

uses
  SysUtils,
  Spring.Container,
  Spring.Container.Common,
  ParentChildRelationShip.Types in 'ParentChildRelationShip.Types.pas';

procedure Main;
var
  parent: IParentObject;
  child: IChildObject;
begin
  GlobalContainer.RegisterType<IParentObject,TParentObject>.PerResolve;
  GlobalContainer.RegisterType<IChildObject,TChildObject>;
  GlobalContainer.Build;
  parent := GlobalContainer.Resolve<IParentObject>;
  child := parent.Child;
  Assert(parent = child.Parent);
end;

begin
  try
    Main;
  except
    on E: Exception do
      Writeln(E.Message);
  end;
  ReportMemoryLeaksOnShutdown := True;
end.

顺便说说.使用接口时,请观察父和子之间的引用.如果他们互相引用,你会得到内存泄漏.您可以通过在一侧使用弱引用(通常是子代中的父引用)来解决此问题.