B_M*_*ner 10 python-2.7 scikit-learn
我正在研究使用scikit-learn构建模型的两个场景,我无法弄清楚为什么其中一个返回的结果与另一个结果根本不同.两种情况(我所知道的)之间唯一不同的是,在一种情况下,我一次性对所有分类变量进行热编码(在整个数据上),然后在训练和测试之间进行分割.在第二种情况下,我在训练和测试之间进行分割,然后根据训练数据对两组进行一次热编码.
后一种情况在技术上更好地判断过程的泛化误差,但这种情况下返回的标准化gini与第一种情况相比显着不同(和差 - 基本上没有模型).我知道第一种情况gini(~0.33)与建立在这个数据上的模型一致.
为什么第二种情况会返回如此不同的基尼?FYI数据集包含数字和分类变量的混合.
方法1(单热编码整个数据,然后拆分)返回:Validation Sample Score: 0.3454355044 (normalized gini).
from sklearn.cross_validation import StratifiedKFold, KFold, ShuffleSplit,train_test_split, PredefinedSplit
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor , ExtraTreesRegressor, GradientBoostingRegressor
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.feature_extraction import DictVectorizer as DV
from sklearn import metrics
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.grid_search import GridSearchCV,RandomizedSearchCV
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor, ExtraTreesRegressor
from scipy.stats import randint, uniform
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error
from sklearn.datasets import load_boston
def gini(solution, submission):
df = zip(solution, submission, range(len(solution)))
df = sorted(df, key=lambda x: (x[1],-x[2]), reverse=True)
rand = [float(i+1)/float(len(df)) for i in range(len(df))]
totalPos = float(sum([x[0] for x in df]))
cumPosFound = [df[0][0]]
for i in range(1,len(df)):
cumPosFound.append(cumPosFound[len(cumPosFound)-1] + df[i][0])
Lorentz = [float(x)/totalPos for x in cumPosFound]
Gini = [Lorentz[i]-rand[i] for i in range(len(df))]
return sum(Gini)
def normalized_gini(solution, submission):
normalized_gini = gini(solution, submission)/gini(solution, solution)
return normalized_gini
# Normalized Gini Scorer
gini_scorer = metrics.make_scorer(normalized_gini, greater_is_better = True)
if __name__ == '__main__':
dat=pd.read_table('/home/jma/Desktop/Data/Kaggle/liberty/train.csv',sep=",")
y=dat[['Hazard']].values.ravel()
dat=dat.drop(['Hazard','Id'],axis=1)
folds=train_test_split(range(len(y)),test_size=0.30, random_state=15) #30% test
#First one hot and make a pandas df
dat_dict=dat.T.to_dict().values()
vectorizer = DV( sparse = False )
vectorizer.fit( dat_dict )
dat= vectorizer.transform( dat_dict )
dat=pd.DataFrame(dat)
train_X=dat.iloc[folds[0],:]
train_y=y[folds[0]]
test_X=dat.iloc[folds[1],:]
test_y=y[folds[1]]
rf=RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators=1000, n_jobs=1, random_state=15)
rf.fit(train_X,train_y)
y_submission=rf.predict(test_X)
print("Validation Sample Score: {:.10f} (normalized gini).".format(normalized_gini(test_y,y_submission)))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
方法2(首先拆分然后单热编码)返回:Validation Sample Score: 0.0055124452 (normalized gini).
from sklearn.cross_validation import StratifiedKFold, KFold, ShuffleSplit,train_test_split, PredefinedSplit
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor , ExtraTreesRegressor, GradientBoostingRegressor
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.feature_extraction import DictVectorizer as DV
from sklearn import metrics
from sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScaler
from sklearn.grid_search import GridSearchCV,RandomizedSearchCV
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestRegressor, ExtraTreesRegressor
from scipy.stats import randint, uniform
from sklearn.metrics import mean_squared_error
from sklearn.datasets import load_boston
def gini(solution, submission):
df = zip(solution, submission, range(len(solution)))
df = sorted(df, key=lambda x: (x[1],-x[2]), reverse=True)
rand = [float(i+1)/float(len(df)) for i in range(len(df))]
totalPos = float(sum([x[0] for x in df]))
cumPosFound = [df[0][0]]
for i in range(1,len(df)):
cumPosFound.append(cumPosFound[len(cumPosFound)-1] + df[i][0])
Lorentz = [float(x)/totalPos for x in cumPosFound]
Gini = [Lorentz[i]-rand[i] for i in range(len(df))]
return sum(Gini)
def normalized_gini(solution, submission):
normalized_gini = gini(solution, submission)/gini(solution, solution)
return normalized_gini
# Normalized Gini Scorer
gini_scorer = metrics.make_scorer(normalized_gini, greater_is_better = True)
if __name__ == '__main__':
dat=pd.read_table('/home/jma/Desktop/Data/Kaggle/liberty/train.csv',sep=",")
y=dat[['Hazard']].values.ravel()
dat=dat.drop(['Hazard','Id'],axis=1)
folds=train_test_split(range(len(y)),test_size=0.3, random_state=15) #30% test
#first split
train_X=dat.iloc[folds[0],:]
train_y=y[folds[0]]
test_X=dat.iloc[folds[1],:]
test_y=y[folds[1]]
#One hot encode the training X and transform the test X
dat_dict=train_X.T.to_dict().values()
vectorizer = DV( sparse = False )
vectorizer.fit( dat_dict )
train_X= vectorizer.transform( dat_dict )
train_X=pd.DataFrame(train_X)
dat_dict=test_X.T.to_dict().values()
test_X= vectorizer.transform( dat_dict )
test_X=pd.DataFrame(test_X)
rf=RandomForestRegressor(n_estimators=1000, n_jobs=1, random_state=15)
rf.fit(train_X,train_y)
y_submission=rf.predict(test_X)
print("Validation Sample Score: {:.10f} (normalized gini).".format(normalized_gini(test_y,y_submission)))
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
inv*_*ion 12
虽然之前的注释正确地建议最好先映射整个要素空间,但在您的情况下,Train和Test都包含所有列中的所有要素值.
如果比较vectorizer.vocabulary_两个版本之间的版本,它们完全相同,因此映射没有区别.因此,它不会导致问题.
究其原因方法2失败,是因为你dat_dict被重新排序由原始索引,当你执行这个命令.
dat_dict=train_X.T.to_dict().values()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
换句话说,train_X有一个混乱的索引进入这行代码.当您将其转换为a时dict,dict顺序将重新排序为原始索引的数字顺序.这会导致您的训练和测试数据完全脱相关y.
方法1不会遇到此问题,因为您在映射后随机播放数据.
您可以通过添加在方法2中.reset_index()分配的两次来解决问题dat_dict,例如,
dat_dict=train_X.reset_index(drop=True).T.to_dict().values()
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这可确保在转换为a时保留数据顺序dict.
当我添加该位代码时,我得到以下结果:
- 方法1:验证样本得分:0.3454355044(标准化基尼)
- 方法2:验证样本得分:0.3438430991(标准化基尼)
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
5973 次 |
| 最近记录: |