datetime.now() 的 Python 解析

tuz*_*zer 5 python windows datetime python-3.4

from datetime import datetime
import time
for i in range(1000):
    curr_time  = datetime.now()
    print(curr_time)
    time.sleep(0.0001)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我正在测试 的分辨率datetime.now()。由于它应该以微秒为单位输出,因此我预计每次打印都会有所不同。

然而,我总是得到类似的东西。

...
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.212073
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
2015-07-10 22:38:47.213074
...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

为什么会发生这种情况?有什么方法可以获得精确到微秒的时间戳吗?实际上我不需要微秒,但能获得 0.1 毫秒的分辨率就很好了。

===更新====

我将其与使用 time.perf_counter() 进行比较,并添加到起始datetime 日期时间导入日期时间、timedelta 导入时间

datetime0 = datetime.now()
t0 = time.perf_counter()
for i in range(1000):
    print('datetime.now(): ', datetime.now())
    print('time.perf_counter(): ', datetime0 + timedelta(0, time.perf_counter()-t0))
    print('\n')

    time.sleep(0.000001)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

我不确定它到底有多“准确”,但分辨率至少更高......这似乎并不重要,因为我的计算机甚至无法以那么高的速度打印。出于我的目的,我只需要不同的时间戳来区分不同的条目,这对我来说已经足够了。

...
datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.010377
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.010352


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.010377
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.010545


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.010377
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.010745


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.010961


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011155


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011369


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011377
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011596


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.011829


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012026


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012232


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012424


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012619


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.012844


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013044


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013242


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013437


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013380
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013638


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.013903


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014125


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014328


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014526


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014379
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014721


datetime.now():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.015381
time.perf_counter():  2015-07-10 23:24:18.014919

...
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

Dan*_*ski 2

这可能是您系统的限制time.sleep,而不是datetime.now()……或者可能两者兼而有之。您运行的是什么操作系统、Python 的版本和发行版?

您的系统可能不提供文档中提到的“亚秒精度” time.sleep

sleep(...)
    sleep(seconds)

    Delay execution for a given number of seconds.  The argument may be
    a floating point number for subsecond precision.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

使用 CPython 2.7 的 amd64 上的 Linux 3.x上,我得到的结果非常接近您想要的 0.0001 时间步长:

2015-07-10 19:58:24.353711
2015-07-10 19:58:24.353879
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354052
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354227
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354401
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354577
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354757
2015-07-10 19:58:24.354938
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)

  • @tuzzer:“datetime.now()”具有微秒**精度**([将来可能支持纳秒](https://bugs.python.org/issue15443))——检查“.resolution”属性。它没有说关于 **准确度** 的任何内容,在 Windows 上可能约为 10 毫秒到 55 毫秒(毫秒==毫秒)([`.utcnow()` 在现代 CPython 和 Windows 上使用 `GetSystemTimeAsFileTime()`](http:// /stackoverflow.com/a/28574340/4279))。请参阅[精度不等于准确度](http://blogs.msdn.com/b/oldnewthing/archive/2005/09/02/459952.aspx) (3认同)