Out*_*ate 2 c++ templates boost const operator-overloading
我试图比较常量引用和具有相同类型的非常量可选对象.我有一个类型NonCopy,这是不可复制的
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/optional.hpp>
struct NonCopy {
NonCopy() { }
NonCopy(const NonCopy&) = delete;
NonCopy& operator=(const NonCopy&) = delete;
};
int main()
{
NonCopy nc;
const NonCopy& object = nc;
boost::optional<NonCopy&> object2 = nc;
if (!object2 && object2.get() != object) {
std::cout << "not equal?\n";
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
哪个收益率
error: no match for ‘operator!=’ (operand types are ‘boost::optional_detail::types_when_is_ref<NonCopy&>::raw_type {aka NonCopy}’ and ‘const NonCopy’)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我尝试了主题的多种变体,包括
if (object2 && const_cast<const NonCopy&>(object2.get()) != object)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这产生了一个非常有趣的错误
error: no match for ‘operator!=’ (operand types are ‘const NonCopy’ and ‘const NonCopy’)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
并列出!= on boost::optional<NonCopy>(例如bool boost::operator!=(const boost::optional<NonCopy>&, const boost::optional<NonCopy>&))的候选者,而不是on NonCopy.
由于object2.get()回报NonCopy&,你的榜样有效地简化为:
NonCopy nc;
const NonCopy& object = nc;
NonCopy& object2 = nc;
object != object2; // error: no match for operator!=
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这只是意味着你的类型NonCopy没有operator!=.实现它,你的代码将编译.boost::optional与此无关.
虽然请注意您正在检查:
if (!object2 && object2.get() != object)
^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
object2 is none, but get it anyway?
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这是未定义的行为.