考虑以下因素
type MyClass () =
member x.ReadStreamAsync(stream:Stream) =
async {
let tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<int>()
let buffer = Array.create 2048 0uy
let! bytesReadCount = stream.ReadAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length) |> Async.AwaitTask
if bytesReadCount > 0 then
for i in 0..bytesReadCount do
if buffer.[i] = 10uy then
tcs.SetResult(i)
// Omitted more code to handle the case if 10uy is not found..
return tcs.Task
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
代码从流中读取,直到遇到某个字符(由字节值表示),此时方法返回的任务完成.
函数签名DoSomethingAsync是unit -> Async<Task<int>>,但我希望unit -> Task<int>它可以在.NET中更普遍地使用.
可以使用异步表达式在F#中完成,还是可以更多地依赖Task.NET 的构造?
鉴于您实际上没有在示例中使用异步工作流,最简单的解决方案是完全放弃它:
member x.DoSomethingAsync() =
let tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<int>()
Task.Delay(100).Wait()
tcs.SetResult(10)
tcs.Task
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这个实现DoSomethingAsync有类型unit -> Task<int>.
我不清楚你到底想要做什么,但你为什么不这样做呢?
member x.DoSomethingAsync() =
async {
do! Async.Sleep 100
return 10 } |> Async.StartAsTask
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
此实现也具有类型unit -> Task<int>.
根据更新的问题,这是一种方法:
member x.DoSomethingAsync(stream:Stream) =
async {
let buffer = Array.create 2048 0uy
let! bytesReadCount =
stream.ReadAsync(buffer, 0, buffer.Length) |> Async.AwaitTask
if bytesReadCount > 0
then
let res =
[0..bytesReadCount]
|> List.tryFind (fun i -> buffer.[i] = 10uy)
return defaultArg res -1
else return -1
}
|> Async.StartAsTask
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
该DoSomethingAsync函数具有类型Stream -> System.Task<int>.我不知道该怎么办else,所以我只是说-1,但我相信你可以用更正确的东西来代替它.