如何同步确定JavaScript Promise的状态？

Question

我有一个纯JavaScript承诺(内置实现或poly-fill):

var promise = new Promise(function (resolve, reject) { /* ... */ });

根据规范,Promise可以是以下之一:

• '已定居'和'已解决'
• '已定居'和'被拒绝'
• "待定"

我有一个用例,我希望同步询问Promise并确定:

• 承诺落户了吗？

• 如果是这样,Promise是否已解决？

我知道我可以#then()用来安排Promise更改状态后异步执行的工作.我不是问怎么做.

这个问题具体是关于Promise状态的同步审讯.我怎样才能做到这一点？

Answer 1

对于本机JavaScript承诺,不存在此类同步检查API.用本机承诺做这件事是不可能的.规范没有指定这样的方法.

Userland库可以做到这一点,如果您的目标是特定引擎(如v8)并且可以访问平台代码(也就是说,您可以在核心中编写代码),那么您可以使用特定工具(如私有符号)来实现此目的.这是超级特定的,而不是用户区.

Answer 2

promise-status-async可以解决问题.它是异步的,但它不会then用来等待承诺得到解决.

const {promiseStatus} = require('promise-status-async');
// ...
if (await promiseStatus(promise) === 'pending') {
    const idle = new Promise(function(resolve) {
        // can do some IDLE job meanwhile
    });
    return idle;
}

Answer 3

不,没有同步API,但这是我的异步版本promiseState(在@Matthijs的帮助下):

function promiseState(p) {
  const t = {};
  return Promise.race([p, t])
    .then(v => (v === t)? "pending" : "fulfilled", () => "rejected");
}

var a = Promise.resolve();
var b = Promise.reject();
var c = new Promise(() => {});

promiseState(a).then(state => console.log(state)); // fulfilled
promiseState(b).then(state => console.log(state)); // rejected
promiseState(c).then(state => console.log(state)); // pending

Answer 4

你可以用Promise.resolve进行比赛
它不是同步的,而是现在发生的

function promiseState(p, isPending, isResolved, isRejected) {
  Promise.race([p, Promise.resolve('a value that p should not return')]).then(function(value) {
    if (value == 'a value that p should not return') {
      (typeof(isPending) === 'function') && isPending();
    }else {
      (typeof(isResolved) === 'function') && isResolved(value);
    }
  }, function(reason) {
    (typeof(isRejected) === 'function') && isRejected(reason);
  });
}

一个小脚本,用于测试和理解它们异步的含义

var startTime = Date.now() - 100000;//padding trick "100001".slice(1) => 00001
function log(msg) {
  console.log((""+(Date.now() - startTime)).slice(1) + ' ' + msg);
  return msg;//for chaining promises
};

function prefix(pref) { return function (value) { log(pref + value); return value; };}

function delay(ms) {
  return function (value) {
    var startTime = Date.now();
    while(Date.now() - startTime < ms) {}
    return value;//for chaining promises
  };
}
setTimeout(log, 0,'timeOut 0 ms');
setTimeout(log, 100,'timeOut 100 ms');
setTimeout(log, 200,'timeOut 200 ms');

var p1 = Promise.resolve('One');
var p2 = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) { setTimeout(resolve, 100, "Two"); });
var p3 = Promise.reject("Three");

p3.catch(delay(200)).then(delay(100)).then(prefix('delayed L3 : '));

promiseState(p1, prefix('p1 Is Pending '), prefix('p1 Is Resolved '), prefix('p1 Is Rejected '));
promiseState(p2, prefix('p2 Is Pending '), prefix('p2 Is Resolved '), prefix('p2 Is Rejected '));
promiseState(p3, prefix('p3 Is Pending '), prefix('p3 Is Resolved '), prefix('p3 Is Rejected '));

p1.then(prefix('Level 1 : ')).then(prefix('Level 2 : ')).then(prefix('Level 3 : '));
p2.then(prefix('Level 1 : ')).then(prefix('Level 2 : ')).then(prefix('Level 3 : '));
p3.catch(prefix('Level 1 : ')).then(prefix('Level 2 : ')).then(prefix('Level 3 : '));
log('end of promises');
delay(100)();
log('end of script');

延迟结果(0)(延迟评论)

00001 end of promises
00001 end of script
00001 Level 1 : One
00001 Level 1 : Three
00001 p1 Is Resolved One
00001 p2 Is Pending undefined
00001 p3 Is Rejected Three
00001 Level 2 : One
00001 Level 2 : Three
00001 delayed L3 : Three
00002 Level 3 : One
00002 Level 3 : Three
00006 timeOut 0 ms
00100 timeOut 100 ms
00100 Level 1 : Two
00100 Level 2 : Two
00101 Level 3 : Two
00189 timeOut 200 ms

和firefox的这个测试结果(chrome保持顺序)

00000 end of promises
00100 end of script
00300 Level 1 : One
00300 Level 1 : Three
00400 p1 Is Resolved One
00400 p2 Is Pending undefined
00400 p3 Is Rejected Three
00400 Level 2 : One
00400 Level 2 : Three
00400 delayed L3 : Three
00400 Level 3 : One
00400 Level 3 : Three
00406 timeOut 0 ms
00406 timeOut 100 ms
00406 timeOut 200 ms
00406 Level 1 : Two
00407 Level 2 : Two
00407 Level 3 : Two

promiseState make .race和.then:Level 2

Answer 5

您可以在Node.js中使用(丑陋)黑客,直到提供本机方法:

util = require('util');

var promise1 = new Promise (function (resolve) {
}

var promise2 = new Promise (function (resolve) {

    resolve ('foo');
}

state1 = util.inspect (promise1);
state2 = util.inspect (promise2);

if (state1 === 'Promise { <pending> }') {

    console.log('pending'); // pending
}

if (state2 === "Promise { 'foo' }") {

    console.log ('foo') // foo
}

Answer 6

await使用@jib的答案，使用惯用的原型设计。

Object.defineProperty(Promise.prototype, "state", {
    get: function(){
        const o = {};
        return Promise.race([this, o]).then(
            v => v === o ? "pending" : "resolved",
            () => "rejected");
    }
});

// usage: console.log(await <Your Promise>.state);
(async () => {
    console.log(await Promise.resolve(2).state);  // "resolved"
    console.log(await Promise.reject(0).state);   // "rejected"
    console.log(await new Promise(()=>{}).state); // "pending"
})();

请注意，这个异步函数“几乎”像同步函数一样立即执行（或者实际上可能立即执行）。

Answer 7

我浏览了针对此问题提出的解决方案，但没有找到与我在 Node.js 中使用的简单方法相对应的解决方案。

我定义了一个简单的 PromiseMonitor 类，它将 Promise 作为其构造函数的单个参数，并具有一个字符串属性，.status该属性返回与 Promise 状态“pending”、“resolved”或“rejected”相对应的标准字符串值，以及四个布尔属性.pending、.resolved、.rejected和.error。仅当为 true并且拒绝回调传递了 Error 对象时，该属性.error才设置为 true 。.rejected

该类只是.then()在 Promise 被解决或拒绝时使用 Promise 来更改 PromiseMonitor 的状态。它不会干扰原始承诺的任何其他用途。这是代码：

class PromiseMonitor {
    constructor(prm){
        this._status = "pending";
        this._pending = true;
        this._resolved = false;
        this._rejected = false;
        this._error = false;
        prm
            .then( ()=>{  
                        this._status = "resolved"; 
                        this._resolved = true; 
                        this._pending = false; 
                    } 
                , (err)=>{ 
                        this._status = "rejected";
                        this._pending = false;
                        this._rejected = true;
                        this._error = err instanceof Error ? true: false ; 
                    } 
                );
    }

    get status(){ return this._status; };
    get pending(){ return this._pending; };
    get resolved(){ return this._resolved; };
    get rejected(){ return this._rejected; };
    get error(){ return this._error };
};

要监视 Promise 的状态，只需创建 PromiseMonitor 的实例，并将 Promise 作为参数传入，例如：

let promiseObject = functionThatReturnsAPromise();
let promiseMonitor = new PromiseMonitor( promiseObject );

现在您可以同步检查 PromiseMonitor 的所有属性，它将跟踪原始 Promise 的状态。这是一个测试脚本，演示了正在监视的 Promise 的三种可能的解决方案。

let ticks = 0;
let tickerID = setInterval( ()=>{++ticks; console.log(`..tick ${ticks}`)}, 1000);

async function run(){
    console.log("Start");

    let delay = prmDelay(2000);
    let delayMonitor = new PromiseMonitor(delay);

    // normal handling of delay promise
    delay.then((result)=>( console.log("Normal resolution of delay using .then()") ) );

    console.log("delay at start:\n", delay);
    console.log("delayMonitor at start:\n", delayMonitor);
    await delay;
    console.log("delay finished:\n", delay);
    console.log("delayMonitor finished:\n", delayMonitor);


    console.log("\n\n TEST2: Rejection without an Error test ================================")
    let rejDelay = prmDelay(3000, "reject");
    let rejMonitor = new PromiseMonitor(rejDelay);

    // normal handling of reject result on promise
    rejDelay.then((result)=>( console.log("Normal resolution of rejDelay using .then will not happen") ) 
                    , (err)=>( console.log("Rejection of rejDelay handled using .then")));

    console.log("rejDelay at start:\n", rejDelay);
    console.log("rejMonitor at start:\n", rejMonitor);

    await rejDelay.catch( (err)=>{ console.log( "Caught error using .catch on rejDelay" ); });

    console.log("rejDelay finished:\n", rejDelay);
    console.log("rejMonitor finished:\n", rejMonitor);


    console.log("\n\n TEST3: Rejection with an Error test ================================")
    let errMonitor ;
    let errDelay;
    try{

        errDelay = prmDelay(1000, "error");
        errMonitor = new PromiseMonitor(errDelay);
        
        // normal handling of results of the original promise
        errDelay.then(
            (result)=>{ 
                console.log("Normal expiry of errDelay");
                console.log("Monitor Status is " + errMonitor.status )
            } 
            , (err)=>{
                console.log("** Rejection of errDelay handled using .then()");
                console.log("   Monitor Status is " + errMonitor.status )
            }
        );

        console.log("errDelay at start:\n", errDelay);
        console.log("errMonitor at start:\n", errMonitor);

        await errDelay;

        console.log("**** This should never be run");

    } catch(err) { 

        console.log( "** Caught error on errDelay using try{}catch{}:" ); 
        console.log( "   Monitor Status is " + errMonitor.status )

    };

    console.log("errDelay finished:\n", errDelay);
    console.log("errMonitor finished:\n", errMonitor);
    

    clearInterval(tickerID);


}

/**
 * Creates a new promise with a specific result
 * @param {*} tt 
 * @param {*} exitType ("resolve", "reject" or "error")
 */
function prmDelay (tt, exitType) {
    
    return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
        if( exitType == 'reject' ){
            setTimeout(()=>{ reject("REJECTED")}, tt);
        } else if( exitType== 'error'){
            setTimeout(()=>{ reject(new Error( "ERROR Rejection") ); }, tt);
        } else {
            setTimeout(()=>{ resolve("RESOLVED") }, tt);
        } ;
    });
};


run();

Answer 8

你可以用这种方式包装你的承诺

function wrapPromise(promise) {
  var value, error,
      settled = false,
      resolved = false,
      rejected = false,
      p = promise.then(function(v) {
        value = v;
        settled = true;
        resolved = true;
        return v;
      }, function(err) {
        error = err;
        settled = true;
        rejected = true;
        throw err;
      });
      p.isSettled = function() {
        return settled;
      };
      p.isResolved = function() {
        return resolved;
      };
      p.isRejected = function() {
        return rejected;
      };
      p.value = function() {
        return value;
      };
      p.error = function() {
        return error;
      };
      var pThen = p.then, pCatch = p.catch;
      p.then = function(res, rej) {
        return wrapPromise(pThen(res, rej));
      };
      p.catch = function(rej) {
        return wrapPromise(pCatch(rej));
      };
      return p;
}

Answer 9

更新时间：2019年

Bluebird.js提供了以下功能：http : //bluebirdjs.com/docs/api/isfulfilled.html

var Promise = require("bluebird");
let p = Promise.resolve();
console.log(p.isFulfilled());

如果您想创建自己的包装器，那么这里是一个不错的博客。

因为JavaScript是单线程的，所以很难找到足够通用的用例来证明将其放入规范中是合理的。知道承诺是否得到解决的最佳位置是.then（）。测试Promise是否已满，将创建一个轮询循环，这很可能是错误的方向。

如果您想同步推理异步代码，那么async / await是一个不错的构造。

await this();
await that();
return 'success!';

另一个有用的调用是Promise.all（）

var promise1 = Promise.resolve(3);
var promise2 = 42;
var promise3 = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
  setTimeout(resolve, 100, 'foo');
});

Promise.all([promise1, promise2, promise3]).then(function(values) {
  console.log(values);
});
// expected output: Array [3, 42, "foo"]

当我第一次获得这个答案时，这就是我要寻找的用例。

Answer 10

缺少此基本功能确实很烦人。如果您使用的是node.js，那么我知道两种解决方法，它们都不是很漂亮。以下两个代码片段都实现了相同的API：

> Promise.getInfo( 42 )                         // not a promise
{ status: 'fulfilled', value: 42 }
> Promise.getInfo( Promise.resolve(42) )        // fulfilled
{ status: 'fulfilled', value: 42 }
> Promise.getInfo( Promise.reject(42) )         // rejected
{ status: 'rejected', value: 42 }
> Promise.getInfo( p = new Promise(() => {}) )  // unresolved
{ status: 'pending' }
> Promise.getInfo( Promise.resolve(p) )         // resolved but pending
{ status: 'pending' }

似乎没有任何方法可以使用任何一种技巧来区分最后两个承诺状态。

1.使用V8调试API

这是使用相同的把戏util.inspect。

const Debug = require('vm').runInDebugContext('Debug');

Promise.getInfo = function( arg ) {
    let mirror = Debug.MakeMirror( arg, true );
    if( ! mirror.isPromise() )
        return { status: 'fulfilled', value: arg };
    let status = mirror.status();
    if( status === 'pending' )
        return { status };
    if( status === 'resolved' )  // fix terminology fuck-up
        status = 'fulfilled';
    let value = mirror.promiseValue().value();
    return { status, value };
};

2.同步运行微任务

这样可以避免使用调试API，但是会引起所有待处理的微任务和process.nextTick回调同步运行，因此具有令人恐惧的语义。它还具有防止被检查的承诺触发“未处理的承诺拒绝”错误的副作用。

Promise.getInfo = function( arg ) {
    const pending = {};
    let status, value;
    Promise.race([ arg, pending ]).then(
        x => { status = 'fulfilled'; value = x; },
        x => { status = 'rejected'; value = x; }
    );
    process._tickCallback();  // run microtasks right now
    if( value === pending )
        return { status: 'pending' };
    return { status, value };
};

Answer 11

在节点中，说未记录的内部 process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(promise)

> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(Promise.resolve({data: [1,2,3]}));
[ 1, { data: [ 1, 2, 3 ] } ]

> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(Promise.reject(new Error('no')));
[ 2, Error: no ]

> process.binding('util').getPromiseDetails(new Promise((resolve) => {}));
[ 0, <1 empty item> ]