Mar*_*kas 25 python return logical-operators python-3.x
def logical_xor(a, b): # for example, -1 and 1
print (a < 0) # evaluates to True
print (b < 0) # evaluates to False
print (a < 0 != b < 0) # EVALUATES TO FALSE! why??? it's True != False
return (a < 0 != b < 0) # returns False when it should return True
print ( logical_xor(-1, 1) ) # returns FALSE!
# now for clarification
print ( True != False) # PRINTS TRUE!
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有人可以解释发生了什么吗?我想做一个班轮:
lambda a, b: (a < 0 != b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
tza*_*man 31
Python中的所有比较运算符都具有相同的优先级.此外,Python确实进行了链接比较.从而,
(a < 0 != b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
分解为:
(a < 0) and (0 != b) and (b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
如果其中任何一个为假,则表达式的总结果为False.
你想要做的是分别评估每个条件,如下所示:
(a < 0) != (b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
其他变种,来自评论:
(a < 0) is not (b < 0) # True and False are singletons so identity-comparison works
(a < 0) ^ (b < 0) # bitwise-xor does too, as long as both sides are boolean
(a ^ b < 0) # or you could directly bitwise-xor the integers;
# the sign bit will only be set if your condition holds
# this one fails when you mix ints and floats though
(a * b < 0) # perhaps most straightforward, just multiply them and check the sign
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您的代码不能按预期工作,因为!=它的优先级高于a < 0和b < 0.正如itzmeontv在他的回答中建议的那样,你可以通过用括号围绕逻辑组件来自己决定优先级:
(a < 0) != (b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
您的代码尝试评估 a < (0 != b) < 0
[编辑]
正如tzaman正确指出的那样,运算符具有相同的优先级,但您的代码正在尝试进行评估(a < 0) and (0 != b) and (b < 0).用括号括起逻辑组件将解决此问题:
(a < 0) != (b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
运算符优先级:https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#operator-precedence
比较(ia链接):https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#not-in
你可以用它
return (a < 0) != (b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
比较可以任意链接,例如,x <y <= z等于x <y和y <= z,除了y仅被评估一次(但在两种情况下,当x <y被发现时,根本不评估z是假的).
所以它变成了
(a < 0) and (0 != b) and (b < 0)
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
请参阅https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#not-in