Jim*_*ean 7 delphi multithreading delphi-xe7 rtl-ppl
为了尝试使用Delphi中的线程库并行计算任务并使用TTask.WaitForAny()
获取第一个计算结果,异常暂时停止了执行.
在例外情况下调用堆栈:
$ 752D2F71的首次机会异常.异常类EMonitorLockException,消息'Object lock not owned'.处理Project1.exe(11248)
:752d2f71 KERNELBASE.RaiseException + 0x48
System.TMonitor.CheckOwningThread
System.ErrorAt(25,$408C70)
System.Error(reMonitorNotLocked)
System.TMonitor.CheckOwningThread
System.TMonitor.Exit
System.TMonitor.Exit($2180E40)
System.Threading.TTask.RemoveCompleteEvent(???)
System.Threading.TTask.DoWaitForAny((...),4294967295)
System.Threading.TTask.WaitForAny((...))
Project9.Parallel2
Project9.Project1
:74ff919f KERNEL32.BaseThreadInitThunk + 0xe
:7723b54f ntdll.RtlInitializeExceptionChain + 0x8f
:7723b51a ntdll.RtlInitializeExceptionChain + 0x5a
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
调用堆栈得出的结论是异常是由线程库中的错误引起的,TMonitor
和/或TTask.WaitForAny()
.为了验证这一点,代码被减少到最低限度:
program Project1;
{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}
uses
System.SysUtils, System.Threading, System.Classes, System.SyncObjs,
System.StrUtils;
var
WorkerCount : integer = 1000;
function MyTaskProc: TProc;
begin
result := procedure
begin
// Do something
end;
end;
procedure Parallel2;
var
i : Integer;
Ticks: Cardinal;
tasks: array of ITask;
LTask: ITask;
workProc: TProc;
begin
workProc := MyTaskProc();
Ticks := TThread.GetTickCount;
SetLength(tasks, WorkerCount); // number of parallel tasks to undertake
for i := 0 to WorkerCount - 1 do // parallel tasks
tasks[i] := TTask.Run(workProc);
TTask.WaitForAny(tasks); // wait for the first one to finish
for LTask in tasks do
LTask.Cancel; // kill the remaining tasks
Ticks := TThread.GetTickCount - Ticks;
WriteLn('Parallel time ' + Ticks.ToString + ' ms');
end;
begin
try
repeat
Parallel2;
WriteLn('finished');
until FALSE;
except
on E: Exception do
writeln(E.ClassName, ': ', E.Message);
end;
Readln;
end.
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
现在错误会在一段时间后重现,并且验证了RTL错误.
这是作为RSP-10197 TTask.WaitForAny提交给Embarcadero的异常EMonitorLockException"Object lock not owned".
鉴于目前使用Delphi线程库无法解决这个问题,问题是:
是否有解决方法并行执行过程以获得第一个获得的解决方案?
下面是一个使用TParallel.For在产生答案时停止执行的示例。它使用TParallel.LoopState向并行 for 循环的其他成员发出信号。通过使用该.Stop
信号,所有当前和待处理的迭代都应该停止。当前迭代应该检查loopState.Stopped
.
procedure Parallel3(CS: TCriticalSection);
var
Ticks: Cardinal;
i,ix: Integer; // variables that are only touched once in the Parallel.For loop
begin
i := 0;
Ticks := TThread.GetTickCount;
TParallel.For(1,WorkerCount,
procedure(index:Integer; loopState: TParallel.TLoopState)
var
k,l,m: Integer;
begin
// Do something complex
k := (1000 - index)*1000;
for l := 0 to Pred(k) do
m := k div 1000;
// If criteria to stop fulfilled:
CS.Enter;
Try
if loopState.Stopped then // A solution was already found
Exit;
loopState.Stop; // Signal
Inc(i);
ix := index;
Finally
CS.Leave;
End;
end
);
Ticks := TThread.GetTickCount - Ticks;
WriteLn('Parallel time ' + Ticks.ToString + ' ticks', ' i :',i,' index:',ix);
end;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
临界区保护计算结果,这里为简单起见 i,ix。
免责声明,鉴于库中存在大量错误System.Threading
,我会推荐使用 OTL 框架的另一种解决方案。至少在图书馆打下稳定的基础之前是这样。