I82*_*uch 5 java generics builder type-safety
我正在尝试使用Builder模式而不是telescoping构造函数创建一个包含许多参数的类.我是按照Joshua Bloch的Effective Java描述的方式做的,在封闭类上有私有构造函数,还有一个公共静态Builder类.Builder类在调用build()之前确保对象处于一致状态,此时它将封闭对象的构造委托给私有构造函数.从而
public class Foo {
// Many variables
private Foo(Builder b) {
// Use all of b's variables to initialize self
}
public static final class Builder {
public Builder(/* required variables */) {
}
public Builder var1(Var var) {
// set it
return this;
}
public Foo build() {
return new Foo(this);
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后我想为某些变量添加类型边界,因此需要参数化类定义.我希望Foo类的边界与Builder类的边界相同.
public class Foo<Q extends Quantity> {
private final Unit<Q> units;
// Many variables
private Foo(Builder<Q> b) {
// Use all of b's variables to initialize self
}
public static final class Builder<Q extends Quantity> {
private Unit<Q> units;
public Builder(/* required variables */) {
}
public Builder units(Unit<Q> units) {
this.units = units;
return this;
}
public Foo build() {
return new Foo<Q>(this);
}
}
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这编译很好,但编译器允许我做我认为应该是编译器错误的事情.例如
public static final Foo.Builder<Acceleration> x_Body_AccelField =
new Foo.Builder<Acceleration>()
.units(SI.METER)
.build();
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这里单位的说法是没有Unit<Acceleration>,但Unit<Length>,但它仍然是由编译器所接受.
我在这做错了什么?我想在编译时确保单元类型正确匹配.
| 归档时间: |
|
| 查看次数: |
7074 次 |
| 最近记录: |