以下两行:
let x = Box::new(("slefj".to_string(), "a".to_string()));
let (a, b) = *x;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
产生错误:
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `x`
--> src/main.rs:3:13
|
3 | let (a, b) = *x;
| - ^ value used here after move
| |
| value moved here
|
= note: move occurs because `x.0` has type `std::string::String`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
有趣的是,如果我使用包含多个部分的枚举类型执行此操作,我会得到一个稍微不同的错误:
enum Tree {
Nil,
Pair(Box<Tree>, Box<Tree>),
}
fn main() {
let x = Box::new(Tree::Nil);
match *x {
Tree::Pair(a, b) => Tree::Pair(a, b),
_ => Tree::Nil,
};
}
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我收到错误:
error[E0382]: use of collaterally moved value: `(x:Tree::Pair).1`
--> src/main.rs:10:23
|
10 | Tree::Pair(a, b) => Tree::Pair(a, b),
| - ^ value used here after move
| |
| value moved here
|
= note: move occurs because `(x:Tree::Pair).0` has type `std::boxed::Box<Tree>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
为什么会发生这种情况,如何使用let/来match获取内部部件的所有权?我知道我可以取消引用并首先命名结构,但如果我将模式匹配到一个结构中,那就会变得非常冗长.
你偶然发现了对解构和盒子的限制.幸运的是,解决这些问题很容易.您需要做的就是引入一个包含整个结构的新中间变量,并从中进行解构:
let x = Box::new(("slefj".to_string(), "a".to_string()));
let pair = *x;
let (a, b) = pair;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
第二个例子:
let pair = *x;
match pair {
Tree::Pair(a, b) => Tree::Pair(a, b),
_ => Tree::Nil,
};
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)