我开始意识到这适合初学者:
package Bad;
has 'arr' => ( is => 'rw', 'ArrayRef[Str]' );
package main;
my $bad = Bad->new(arr => [ "foo", "bar" ]);
print $bad->arr->[0], "\n";
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
输入特征.不过,我对特质API感到不知所措.我误解了什么吗?我能以某种方式获得此API吗?:
print $bad->arr->get(0), "\n";
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
查看Moose :: Meta :: Attribute :: Native :: Trait :: Array中的规范特征示例
package Stuff;
use Moose;
has 'options' => (
traits => ['Array'],
is => 'ro',
isa => 'ArrayRef[Str]',
default => sub { [] },
handles => {
all_options => 'elements',
add_option => 'push',
map_options => 'map',
filter_options => 'grep',
find_option => 'first',
get_option => 'get',
join_options => 'join',
count_options => 'count',
has_options => 'count',
has_no_options => 'is_empty',
sorted_options => 'sort',
},
);
no Moose;
1;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
像这样声明的对象用于例如:
my $option = $stuff->get_option(1);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
我真的不喜欢我获得的一个数组属性,并且必须在我的Stuff类中手动命名11个方法 - 一个用于每个操作,可以对'选项'执行操作.不一致的命名必然会发生,而且很臃肿.
我如何(优雅地)获得如下API:
my $option = $stuff->options->get(1);
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
Moose :: Meta :: Attribute :: Native :: Trait :: Array的所有方法都是以类型安全的方式实现的吗?
然后,每个数组上的所有操作都以完全相同的方式命名...
(我实际上使用鼠标,但大多数鼠标与Moose相同)
我认为将API转换为该格式的最佳方法是为选项创建一个新对象,并将方法直接委托给它.就像是:
package Stuff;
use Moose;
use Stuff::Options;
has 'options' => (
'is' => "ro",
'isa' => "Stuff::Options",
'default' => sub { Stuff::Options->new },
);
no Moose;
1;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
然后在Stuff/Options.pm
:
package Stuff::Options;
use Moose;
has '_options' => (
'is' => "ro",
'isa' => "ArrayRef[Str]",
'traits' => [ "Array" ],
'default' => sub { [] },
'handles' => [ qw(elements push map grep first get join count is_empty sort) ],
);
no Moose;
1;
Run Code Online (Sandbox Code Playgroud)
这将允许代码中的代码工作($stuff->options->get(1)
).